Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
美联储“左右互搏”:哈马克喊加息,巴尔金说再等等,9月到底听谁的? 同一天,同一个美联储。 一个人在俄亥俄州代顿说:“我们现在必须加息。” 另一个人在南卡罗来纳州格林维尔说:“再等等看,通胀可能自己会下来。” 一个说“一次加息根本不够,可能需要好几次”。 一个说“维持利率不变和继续加息,都有道理”。 这不是剧本。这是2026年8月13日,真实发生的场面。 美联储,正在左右互搏。 先看数据。 这周出了两件大事。 周三,7月CPI出炉——环比涨0.1%,同比涨3.4%;核心CPI同比从2.6%降至2.5%。 周四,7月PPI出炉——同比从5.5%骤降至4.7%,环比持平,双双低于预期。 同一天,初请失业金人数升至20.9万,略高于预期的20.2万。 生产端降温、消费端降温、就业市场微凉。三个信号叠在一起,指向同一个方向:通胀压力在缓解。 数据公布后,CME FedWatch显示9月维持利率不变的概率一度升至67.6%。 按理说,加息应该不用急了吧? 但有人不这么认为。 贝丝·哈马克,克利夫兰联储主席,今年FOMC票委。 她在7月会议上就已经投了加息反对票。 这周她连续放鹰—— 周一(8月10日)说:一次25个基点的加息“对经济不会产生太大影响”,可能需要多次加息才能把通胀压回2%。 周四(8月13日)又说:“美联储现在必须加息。” 她的理由是什么? 第一,现在的利率“并不具有限制性” ——3.5%到3.75%的利率区间,根本没对经济形成实质性压制。 第二,通胀是“广泛存在的” ,不止是某一个行业的问题。 第三,她担心金融稳定风险——美债杠杆、私募信贷扩张、AI泡沫,全在她盯着的名单上。 哈马克的态度很明确:别等了,再等就晚了。 但有人觉得她在小题大做。 汤姆·巴尔金,里士满联储主席,今年不是FOMC票委。 同一天(8月13日),他在南卡罗来纳州说了一番完全不同的话。 巴尔金认为,当前的高通胀“很大程度上源于关税、伊朗战争造成的油价冲击,以及AI投资热潮”——这些都是“应当会消退的冲击”。 如果这些冲击逐步消退,现在的利率可能已经够用了,通胀可能自己就会回落,不需要再加息。 他把美国经济形容成一部“悬疑小说” ——结局还没写出来,别急着翻到最后一页。 但他也留了个活口:如果供应链问题持续、AI资本开支长时间维持高位,价格压力可能变成持久性通胀,那时候就不得不加息了。 巴尔金的态度也很明确:再等等,看看情况再说。 现在问题来了——听谁的? 关键信息在这里: 哈马克是今年FOMC票委,有投票权。 巴尔金今年不是票委,只有列席权。 票委的嘴,比候补的更有分量。 哈马克不是一个人在战斗。 7月FOMC会议上,三个人投了反对票,都主张加息25个基点。 明尼阿波利斯联储主席卡什卡利也说,美联储应该 “开始渐进加息” 。 美联储理事库克也表示,如果通胀数据不改善,她已准备支持加息。 鹰派的阵营,正在扩大。 那市场怎么看? 截至8月14日,CME“美联储观察”显示: 9月维持利率不变的概率——65.2% 9月加息25个基点的概率——34.8% 市场押注按兵不动。但34.8%的加息概率,也不是一个小数字。 而且到10月,维持利率不变的概率已经降到了50.1%,加息概率升到了41.8%。 换句话说:市场认为9月可能不动,但10月或12月,加息可能躲不掉。 这对我们意味着什么? 美联储内部分歧越大,市场的波动就越大。 9月16日FOMC之前,每一次官员讲话,都是一次定向爆破。 哈马克再喊一次加息,BTC可能跌一波。 巴尔金再说一次“再等等”,BTC可能反弹一波。 你赌的是数据,还是赌的是谁的嗓门更大? 别以为通胀降温就等于加息结束。 哈马克还在举着拳头。而她手里,有票。 9月FOMC倒计时33天。 你觉得美联储会加息,还是按兵不动? $BTC $ETH $APR #CPI与PPI同步降温,加息分歧扩大
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Buying "a few milliseconds" for $100,000: When presidential posts become paid insider information, what are we still playing at? Over the past year, how many times have you only realized the market was about to move after scrolling through a Trump post? Tariffs, the Iran war, monetary policy—one of his posts can cause the S&P 500 to surge 9% in a single day. By the time you see it, the price has already soared or crashed. You think, "The news was too fast; I couldn't keep up." The truth is—you’re not even on the same starting line. On August 12, two U.S. media organizations—The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation—filed a lawsuit against Trump in the New York Federal Court. What’s the lawsuit about? It’s about his paid data service called "Truth API." This service charges $60,000 to $100,000 per month, prioritizing the delivery of posts from Trump and other White House officials to paying Wall Street firms at "millisecond-level" speed. $100,000 to buy a few milliseconds. A few milliseconds in quantitative trading means tens of millions of dollars in profit difference. More than 10 high-frequency trading firms have already signed up, with expected annual revenue of $7 million to $12 million—2 to 3 times the company’s total revenue last year. There’s a passage in the complaint I read three times— "The president gains economic benefits by providing government information that 'impacts the market' to those willing and able to pay his personal company." To translate: Trump posts something that might affect the market—Wall Street pays to see it a few milliseconds earlier and completes their trades—then you see it—the price has already changed—you chase the highs or cut losses—Trump’s company profits. And you are the only one in this chain who pays but is always a step behind. The advocacy director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation said: "The president sells priority access to the information he releases to profit his private company under his control—this behavior is so blatantly corrupt and unconstitutional that it was unimaginable just a few years ago." Unimaginable a few years ago. Today, it’s live and operating. You might ask: Isn’t this just an "information gap"? Wall Street has Bloomberg terminals and professional data services—what’s different? The difference is—the "source" of this information is the creator of the information and the largest shareholder of this information service. Trump holds over 40% of Trump Media & Technology Group. He posts—his company profits. He sells the posts early to Wall Street—his company profits again. One piece of information, profiting twice. And when you see it, the soup is already cold. What’s more ironic? Trump Media & Technology Group lost $238 million in Q2 this year. Bitcoin holdings are underwater by hundreds of millions. Daily active users are only 260,000, down 40% year-over-year. Traffic is poor, advertising is poor, cryptocurrency is poor. Then they found a new business model—selling the president’s "time difference." During his second term, Trump posted and reposted about 10,000 posts on Truth Social, many without accompanying official White House statements. In other words—if you want to know what the president is saying first, the only channel is his own paid platform. Democratic Senators Warren and Schiff have already written to the SEC demanding an investigation. But investigations take time. And the market trades every millisecond. Back to us. In this market, what are we facing? Algorithms that are a few milliseconds faster than you. Institutions paying $100,000 a month for "priority." A president who profits from posting. Are you still looking at candlesticks, counting waves, analyzing MACD golden and death crosses? They’re playing the game of information production, distribution, and pricing. You analyze the "past." They trade the "future"—the future a few milliseconds ahead. I’m not telling you to despair. I’m telling you to wake up. In this market, "fairness" is never the default setting. If you don’t have a $100,000 monthly fee, millisecond-level fiber optics, or AI algorithms to automatically interpret posts— don’t consider yourself an "information trader." You can only be a "price follower." And the only survival rule for price followers is not chasing news—it’s waiting for the news to be fully digested before watching the direction. Trump posts, institutions complete trades within milliseconds, the market digests it within minutes. When you rush in then, whose position are you taking? Think about it yourself. When information itself becomes a commodity, and the creator of the information is also the seller—this market is no longer trading assets. It’s trading "who sees it first." And you are never the one who sees it first. $BTC $ETH $TRUMP #特朗普因TruthSocial付费数据流遭起诉

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!