Post

挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
Show original
当加息概率冲到90%,比特币反而没崩——这件事比加息本身更值得你害怕 先看一个反直觉的事实。 8月核心CPI环比0.3%,超预期。加息概率从69.4%直接干到90%。按照传统剧本,风险资产应该集体跳水。 但比特币在数据公布后涨了1.5%,冲到78,600美元。 同期以太坊在涨,SOL在涨,资金没有撤离加密市场。 加息利空,BTC抗跌。这个背离背后,藏着一个大多数人还没意识到的事。 当90%的人都在赌同一件事的时候,这件事就不再重要了。 LMAX的策略师说得很直白:大部分鹰派风险已经体现在价格里了。高盛更狠,直接说如果美联储在90%概率下选择不加息,反而会引发剧烈波动——所以加息本身成了“最不坏”的选择。 翻译成人话:赌场里的所有人都在押“加息”,庄家也只能顺着来。 宏观交易员关于“加不加息”的定价工作,已经做完了。接下来主导市场的,是两类完全不同的人。 第一类:华尔街的钱。它们在“赌事件结束”。 逻辑很简单——加息落地等于不确定性消除。对宏观基金来说,交易的是利率路径,不是利率本身。路径一旦确定,空头就要回补,持仓就要平仓。 证据就在ETF数据里。虽然9月11日比特币ETF录得3.08亿美元净流出,是两个月来最大单日流出——但你仔细看: 摩根士丹利的MSBT ETF在过去两周 quietly 囤了641.87枚BTC,约5060万美元。 一边是散户看着ETF流出数据恐慌,一边是机构在闷声建仓。 灰度研究负责人扎克·潘德尔把当前局势定性为“暂时性障碍”,而不是衰退前兆,他说小幅下跌反而是给错失8月上涨的机构提供了低位建仓机会。 华尔街在买,不是因为看好比特币,是因为他们在交易“利空出尽”这四个字。 第二类:链上的钱。它们在“赌流动性还能撑多久”。 这才是真正需要警惕的地方。 比特币在加息预期升温时展现出抗跌性,但这种抗跌的背后,链上流动性正在悄悄抽干。 Bitfinex的数据很扎心:2025年Q2到2026年Q2,DeFi借贷和交易场所的存款总额下降了约15%。更荒诞的是——你把USDC存到Aave,拿到的利率是3.39%。你买代币化的美国国债,拿到的利率是3.56%。 链上借贷池付给你的利息,比无风险的国债还低。 当DeFi的收益率打不过国债,谁还愿意把钱留在链上? 今年DeFi的TVL从1月的1150亿美元跌到了700亿附近,缩水39%。DEX日交易量从9月初的37亿美元跌到19亿,腰斩。稳定币供应增长陷入停滞,USDT和USDC的流通规模在今年上半年都出现了收缩。 ETF在流入,链上在流出。同一个市场,两种完全相反的钱在打架。 定价权的转移,就发生在这个裂缝里。 过去,比特币的涨跌由宏观利率预期主导。现在,加息已经是共识,宏观交易员的活儿干完了。定价权暂时交到了一直在通过ETF买入的机构手里——这就是为什么BTC在加息概率飙升时反而能抗跌。 但这不是永久的。 如果FOMC之后连续加息的预期强化,链上流动性收缩的力量会逐渐占据上风。 道明证券已经预测本轮要加三次——9月、10月、明年1月。摩根大通也改口,预计9月和12月各加一次。 每一次加息,都在抽走链上的水。 比特币现在的“抗跌”,靠的是机构的ETF买盘暂时压过了宏观抛压。但这个缓冲垫,正在被连续加息的预期一点点消耗。 最扎心的问题来了: 当90%的人都在赌加息,而加息真的落地了——机构会因为“事件结束”而买入,链上资金会因为“流动性收缩”而撤退。 你站在哪一边? 如果你的仓位逻辑是“加息利空出尽,抄底”,那你其实在赌机构的钱跑得比链上的钱快。 如果你的仓位逻辑是“流动性收缩,减仓观望”,那你其实在赌链上的钱跑得比机构的钱快。 这个市场现在只有两种人:在赌谁先跑的,和还没意识到自己在赌的。 $BTC $ETH $SOL #美国CPI环比加速,加息预期升温
挖矿的小羊
挖矿的小羊
On September 8, UBS overturned its "no change for the whole year" stance, saying there would be two 25bp hikes in September and December. On September 11, Goldman Sachs changed from "no change" to "25bp hike in September." On the same day, TD Securities directly reversed to "three rate hikes starting in September, with the last two in October and January next year." Citi expects a rate hike in September, maintaining rates until June 2027. JPMorgan changed to two 25bp hikes in September and December. All six investment banks flipped on the same day. But what was the situation six months ago? In February this year, TD Securities expected three rate cuts within the year. In June, Waugh’s debut raised the dot plot to 3.8%, with nearly half of officials turning hawkish on rate hikes. Then in August, CPI data came out with core month-on-month at 0.3%, exceeding the expected 0.2%, pushing the probability of a rate hike from 69.4% directly to 90%. 90%. The first time in three years. The last Fed rate hike was in July 2023. Rates were held at 5.25%–5.50%. Now, they are moving up again from 3.50%–3.75%. Why is Wall Street collectively tearing up their reports? Waugh reversed the burden of proof. The original words from the Jackson Hole speech were "there is more work to do if inflation targets are not met." Previously, the burden was to prove rate hikes were justified; now it is to prove that pausing is justified. And the "new Fed press agency" Nick Timiraos revealed a more painful data point: since the 1990s, the Fed has only once stopped after a single rate hike—in 1997. Former Fed Vice Chair Clarida said directly: if there is a rate hike next week, there is a very high probability of another one. To translate: this is not a one-and-done rate hike. The market is pricing in not a single hike, but a cycle. But the truly strange thing is happening in the crypto market. After the CPI data release, Bitcoin rose 1.5% against the trend, returning to $78,600. A 1.5% increase within 24 hours shows strong resilience. 21Shares research strategist Matt Mena provided data: within 30 days of core CPI exceeding expectations, Bitcoin’s average gain is 2.13%. ETF funds are tearing apart. From September 8 to 10, spot ETFs saw outflows for three consecutive days, totaling $449 million. But in the same week, Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas observed a single-day inflow of about $500 million, "like hitting a home run during a slump." Institutions are both dumping and bottom-fishing. The same week. The Fear & Greed Index dropped from 74 to 56, with severe long liquidations. But Bitcoin did not crash. It hovered between $76,000 and $78,500, waiting for the FOMC, holding firm. How to understand this divergence? LMAX strategist Joel Kruger said a key point: traders were already leaning toward rate hikes before the CPI release; most hawkish risks are already priced in. Risk Dimensions CIO Mark Connors added a harsher point: Bitcoin and gold rising together shows the market doubts not the interest rate level, but policy credibility. "We cannot print oil, and Bitcoin cannot be devalued." Rate hikes bearish? That was the 2022 script. Now the market fears not the hikes themselves, but government debt and inflation spiraling out of control. One crucial difference most people overlook. The 2022 rate hike cycle started from zero interest rates. This time, it starts from 3.50%–3.75%. Raising from zero to 5% is called tightening. Raising above 3.75% means tightening further in an already tight environment, fully opening the imagination space for terminal rates. If TD Securities’ predicted three hikes materialize, it means three consecutive liquidity tightenings over the next four months: September, October, and January next year. Each one directly drains liquidity from the crypto market. Are you ready to get slapped three months in a row? 👉 Six months ago, Wall Street was discussing how many cuts; six months later, they are discussing how many hikes. 👉 Has your position kept up with this change? 👉 An 82% probability of a rate hike is not news. The news is: no one knows when the second hike will come. $BTC $ETH $XAU #美国CPI环比加速,加息预期升温

Disclaimer: OKX Orbit content is provided for informational purposes only. Learn more

Replies

No comments yet. Be the first to reply!