Post

BitMine, chaired by Tom Lee, holds 5.93 million ETH with a book loss of about $5 billion, having an average purchase cost between $3,400 and $3,900. The same Tom Lee publicly stated on September 13 that the crypto market will be "very bullish" over the next 12 months, and the bottom of the four-year cycle might be next month. A person holding a $5 billion loss tells you the future is extremely bullish. Do you think this is faith or survival? Let's restore the full picture of this gamble: In August 2025, BitMine started accumulating ETH at an average price of $3,840 to $3,950. In 35 days, it spent $5 billion, earning the title of "the world's largest ETH treasury company." In October 2025, ETH surged to a peak of $4,955. BitMine's unrealized gains were once very considerable. Then what happened? ETH fell from $4,955 down to around $1,500, a drop of over 57%. BitMine's book loss expanded to about $10.5 billion by June 2026. Now, ETH has rebounded to around $2,500. BitMine's unrealized loss has narrowed from $10.5 billion to $5 billion. Sounds like good news? Let's do the math: BitMine's average holding cost is about $3,513, ETH's current price is about $2,500. To break even, it still needs a 40% increase. In other words, ETH needs to rise from $2,500 to $3,500 for BitMine to just break even. Until then, every "bullish" statement from Tom Lee is essentially defending his own balance sheet. Can staking income save the day? BitMine has staked over 5 million ETH, generating about $330 million in annual staking income. $330 million. Sounds like a lot. But compared to a $5 billion unrealized loss, staking income only covers 6.6% of the loss. If ETH falls further and losses widen, $330 million won't even cover the tip. More painfully, BitMine's financial report shows that in Q3 of fiscal 2026, staking income was about $45.7 million, but net loss during the same period was as high as $83.6 million—because Ethereum derivatives options trading strategies lost $92.1 million, swallowing all staking income. Making money from staking while losing money on options. Doesn't this operation look like using stablecoin interest to open contracts? What about the "$100 trillion tokenization" story? Tom Lee's latest narrative is: $100 trillion of assets migrating on-chain, charging a 1% fee, generating $1.1 trillion in annual revenue, corresponding to a $20 trillion market opportunity. This is a typical long-term discounted narrative. Using a sufficiently large future imagination space to hedge the current $5 billion book embarrassment. And note one detail: Tom Lee said Fundstrat's recommendation of a 2% crypto allocation more than a decade ago has now ballooned to over 85% in client accounts. 2% turned into 85%. This sounds like a footnote of a bull market. But from another perspective—if crypto assets make up 85% of your portfolio, how much room for error do you have? Tom Lee says clients didn't add positions, only prices rose. But what about when prices fall? An 85% position falling versus a 2% position falling feels completely different in scale. The "gray rhino" to be most wary of BitMine's holdings account for about 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply. If BitMine is forced to reduce holdings due to balance sheet pressure, it will have a huge impact on ETH price. Analysts estimate forced selling could cause ETH to drop another 20% to 40%, turning today's book loss into a realized loss. But BitMine probably has about 2 million ETH staked, with withdrawal queues possibly delayed by days or even weeks. This means even if it wants to run, it can't. Staking locks liquidity and also locks BitMine's escape route. This is both protection and a shackle. Back to the core question Tom Lee's "extremely bullish" logic is: the $19 billion leverage from last October has been cleared, and the four-year cycle bottom will appear next month. This judgment might be correct. But when a person's holdings determine his viewpoint, his viewpoint is no longer a viewpoint but a stance. BitMine holds 5.93 million ETH, aiming for holdings to account for 5% of the total network supply. Every time he shouts "bullish," it's managing the market value of his own position. So who ultimately pays for this $5 billion loss? Is it retail investors who believe Tom Lee and follow? Investors holding BMNR stock? Or every ETH holder—because when BitMine is forced to reduce holdings, the cost of dumping will be borne by the entire market. When a person is both referee and player—do you still dare to trust the whistle he blows? $ETH $BTC $ZEC