Post

Elon Musk says AI will account for 99% of SpaceX's value in five years, and I only focus on one thing If the CEO of a company tells you that 99% of your investment's value in five years will come from a business that hasn't fully proven itself yet— Do you believe it or not? On August 12, Musk said this at the SpaceX all-hands meeting: "I dare say that five years from now, AI will definitely account for 99% of the company's valuation. And by then, SpaceX's total value will be an astronomical figure." This is not just a casual remark. This is the CEO of a $2 trillion market cap public company setting a strategic tone for all employees at an all-hands meeting. SpaceX is no longer just a space company. In Musk's narrative, it is becoming an AI company. Let's look at the data. In Q2 2026, SpaceX's total revenue was $7.814 billion. Of that, AI business revenue was $2.6 billion—quarter-over-quarter growth of 213%, year-over-year growth of 247%. Starlink brought in $4.291 billion, and space launches $962 million. Got it? AI business is almost catching up to Starlink. And Musk's exact words were: "Not maybe, definitely—our AI revenue will surpass all other SpaceX revenue around September, which is next month, and will significantly exceed it in Q4." Next month. A company that builds rockets, launches satellites, and operates Starlink will have AI revenue surpassing all traditional business combined. Even crazier is the computing power target. SpaceX currently has 1.4 gigawatts of AI computing power, planning to expand to 10 gigawatts by the end of next year. Musk's estimate: each watt of computing power corresponds to $30 to $50 in annual revenue—once 10 gigawatts is realized, annual revenue will be $300 billion to $500 billion. What does that mean? SpaceX's total revenue this year is expected to be just over $30 billion. AI will start directly at $300 billion. But there's another side to the story. On August 5, SpaceX released its first financial report since going public: Revenue exceeded expectations, net loss narrowed by 46%—after-hours stock price dropped over 8%. Why? Capital expenditure was $18.37 billion, of which $15.8 billion was invested in AI infrastructure. In Q1, AI business capital expenditure was $7.7 billion, more than twice the combined spending on space and Starlink. What is Wall Street afraid of? That this story is too expensive. So back to the original question— If AI business continues to expand, what should you focus on most? Revenue realization? Capital expenditure? Or technology implementation? My answer is: all of them, but with different priorities. First, look at the return on capital expenditure. In Q2, SpaceX's AI capital expenditure was $15.8 billion, AI revenue was $2.6 billion. The input-output ratio is roughly 6:1. If 10 gigawatts is realized by the end of next year and $300 billion annual revenue is achieved—that spending today is called "strategic investment." If not realized, it's called "value destruction." Second, look at the revenue structure. AI revenue surpassing traditional business in September—that timeline is Musk's own KPI. If it happens, the story continues. If not, the faith collapses. It's that simple. Third, look at technology implementation. "Ground training, space inference"—can this architecture be realized? Can Starship batch-launch computing power satellites into space? If the technology stalls, even the best financial model is worthless. Finally, a hard truth— Five years ago, Musk said Tesla would dominate electric vehicles, and no one believed it. Now, he says 99% of SpaceX's value will come from AI in five years— Do you plan to believe it or not? But belief is not important. What matters is—are you focusing on the story or the data? $BTC $SPCX $ETH #马斯克称AI将占SpaceX价值99%