Orbit Post Sitemap
My best friend said her boyfriend works at a big tech company and lost a house in cryptocurrency trading
My first reaction after hearing this was not sympathy
It opens the list of decliners
I want to find out who is bleeding today
And what happened?
The market is not crashing
BTC 64513
In fact, the 24-hour period has increased
0.71%.
ETH is a bit brighter
By around 1885,
Up about 1.5%.
SOL 74. 95
also about 1.4%.
So this is not a "full sell-off day"
It is the day of structural differentiation
Keep up with the narrative of easing and funding
First, look up
Can't keep up
Continuing to fall gloomily adds to the frustration
On Friday, the ETF still recorded a net outflow of about $225 million
The ledger is rather cold
But the spot will be warmer on weekends
This kind of misalignment is the easiest to deceive
You might think the reversal is confirmed
Actually, it's just a short squeeze out a bit
The bulls also didn't dare to fully leverage their position
The funding rate is almost zero
It was more like no one wanted to stay overnight and gamble on the direction
Names on the decline list
Most of the time, it's the ebb of narrative and the drain of fluidity
It's not that big shots are being smashed through
My best friend's line, 'Losing a whole house,'
This kind of structure feels especially authentic
When making money, I feel like I understand rotation
Only when you lose money do you realize it
What I bought myself is elastic
Not a Beta
So my judgment is
Today, don't use 'declining trend sentiment' to define the entire market
First, distinguish whether it's an index issue or a currency issue
The index is still hovering around 64,000
Individual currency killing is about crowded transactions
I only consider swapping weak ones for cleaner spot stock
Don't use high leverage to bet on V-reversals in a differentiated market
Next, let's take a quick look at the latest hot topics and chat casually:
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
News of the storage duo securing major AI orders is still circulating, with risk appetite heating up in equity narratives first, then slowly seeping into crypto risk assets. The small rise in Bitcoin is more like sentiment spillover, not chip orders directly converting into buying. I will treat this as background note on risk appetite, not using a coin to map every supply chain news.
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, it has received endorsement from industry collectives
The open source proposal sounds passionate, and the AI narrative has already been priced up several times on the market. In the short term, the more sensitive issue is whether computing power capital expenditures can be realized. On the crypto side, AI tag coins are highly flexible and have thin logic, making them suitable as emotional thermometers, but not as main holdings. I'd rather see if there is real demand for hash rate and stablecoin payments, rather than chasing after another wave of slogans.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
A monthly transaction volume of 470 billion sounds alarming, indicating that tokenized asset trading layers are actually being used—not just roadshow PPTs. A surge in volume doesn't mean your wallet's miscellaneous coins will rise accordingly; structured products rely on rates and basis differences. I will use RWA as my main mid-term tracker, while in the short term, I will prioritize the Bitcoin position and leveraged crowding.
$BTC $ETH #跌幅解读 #结构分化My dad asked me what DeFi is, and I said, don't worry about it, I'll help you buy it
My dad came to ask again tonight
I just looked at the board and could only give a dry laugh
Traditional markets are closed on Sundays
But Da Bing was bouncing around on his own
I quickly glanced at the message
The easing winds from the US and Iran have risen again
The previous two crude oils clearly fell back
Negotiations for the opening of the strait have also made progress
Then guess what
BTC 64513
In 24 hours, it rose by 0.71%.
The missile narrative is a bit looser
Oil prices fell first
The currency is first green
US stocks will have to wait until Monday to open and verify their results
This collaboration is a bit twisted
In the past, whenever I heard about tensions in the Middle East,
Everyone was just waiting to smash the price and put on a show
Now, pricing is more like the Xiansong product channel
Risk assets will find a way out over the weekend
On Friday, the ETF still saw a net outflow of about $225 million
The cumulative net inflow was about 81.2 billion yuan
Institutional ledgers are not so romantic
But the spot just doesn't go along with the panic script
The open interest in BTC contracts on OKX is about 31,700 units
This amounts to around 2 billion US dollars
The funding rate is close to zero
The weekend volume is also not exaggerated
It looks more like a sideways trading loss
It's not a trend ignite
So my judgment is
Before Monday's open, don't formulate 'oil drop = US stocks must rally = crypto must surge.'
Easing only reduces tail risk premiums
Whether it's real or not depends on whether US stock futures and crude oil are confirmed together
I'd rather see the reaction with the in-stock stock
Don't use weekend sentiment to leverage it
Looking through today's plate, there are a few interesting points:
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
Earnings season is still reflecting on the two reports from Google and TeslaThe stock price has dropped from $200 to $110, completely shattering the logic of "scarcity." The first batch of 20% employee stock ownership unlocked at the end of July is just the beginning. By August 6, about 910 million shares are expected to be tradable, while the previously tradable shares accounted for only about 4% of total share capital—the supply is about to double or even more.
For a large number of employees with very low exercise costs, the unrealized profit on paper is still substantial even at $110. Mortgages, education, asset allocation—monetization is a rigid demand. Not to mention, short positions now account for about 30% of the circulating shares, so short selling funds are positioning in advance, waiting to receive these "blood-soaked chips."
But risk often breeds opportunity. If the stock price accelerates its decline after the early August earnings report, or if a sharp drop leads to a clear volume reduction and bottoming pattern, it is highly likely that panic trading and unlocking selling pressure are being concentrated and released. At that time, low-price chips may appear. I will wait for that moment. ⚠️During the 2024-2025 rally, the main rally for altcoins generally didn't last more than three months, followed by a general pullback of over 80%. During this short window, only a few people took profits in time, while most were trapped. Essentially, they treated the hype story as a long-term value belief.
The lifespan of counterfeit markets is extremely short, caused by multiple factors combined:
First, altcoin buying funds are limited to the existing market within the circle, with no external incremental funds entering the market; Second, it represents the end of market rotation, with most funds already diverted to mainstream coins; Combined with project token unlocks and project team dumping, selling pressure is continuous; This round of ETFs also diverted mainstream coin funds, and the 'dog' sector has taken up liquidity from the market stock.
Looking ahead, I am more optimistic about the DeFi sector, whose market cycle will also last about three months. #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard 🚀 RWA perpetual monthly trading volume reaches 470 billion, surging 450% in just half a year!
This is not a celebration at the end of a bull market, but a signal for the start of a new track.
Tokenized stocks, commodities, and even SpaceX are being "perpetuated" on-chain.
In June, just OKX and the other three platforms captured over 80% of the market share, while SpaceX made $66 billion in a single month.
🧠 My three observations:
❶ Not speculative repackaging, but capital seeking "on-chain alphas"
The low volatility of traditional assets + the high leverage of perpetual contracts naturally makes them suitable for market makers and event-driven traders. 66 billion is not something retail investors can accumulate; institutions are testing the waters.
❷ Tokenized stocks surged 7 times—who's next?
I believe it is the government bond income rights — on-chain interest-bearing assets + RWA compliance, which is a trillion-yuan blue ocean. Pre-IPO liquidity is poor, foreign exchange regulatory barriers are high, and government bonds are most likely to burst first.
❸ You haven't made a deal yet? What are you waiting for?
Liquidity and other factors? Regulation? and other user-friendly UIs?
—These are improving rapidly, while the first movers are already taking the premium.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 High prosperity and high volatility in storage stocks: Which is more worth watching, Micron, SanDisk, or SK Hynix?
The expansion of AI computing power is reshaping the competitive landscape of the storage industry. In the past, investors viewed memory and flash as highly cyclical basic components; price increases often meant supply-demand imbalances, while price declines meant inventory buildup. With the advent of the AI era, HBM, high-capacity server DRAM, and enterprise-grade SSDs have begun to become core devices in data centers, giving storage manufacturers new growth opportunities.
However, the recent performance of storage stocks reminds investors that a positive industry fundamental does not necessarily mean stock prices can continue to rise. On July 24, Micron fell about 7% in a single day, SanDisk dropped about 11%, and SK Hynix's Korean domestic stock dropped about 8%. Previously, all three companies experienced significant gains, but the recent pullback feels more like profit-taking and valuation revaluation rather than a sudden disappearance of demand.
AI continues to expand storage demand
AI servers require large amounts of HBM to improve GPU data transfer efficiency, and DRAM is also needed to store running data. As model scale increases, data centers will need to deploy more SSDs to store training data, model files, caches, and inference results.
Market research firm Gartner predicts that DRAM prices could rise by 125% in 2026, NAND Flash prices by 234%, and storage price pressures may continue beyond 2027. Gartner Industry Forecast
TrendForce also holds a bullish outlook for Q2 2026, expecting traditional DRAM contract prices to rise 58% to 63% quarter-over-quarter, and NAND Flash prices to increase 70% to 75%. Storage manufacturers are shifting more capacity toward HBM, server memory, and enterprise-grade SSDs, causing supply contractions for storage products used in regular PCs and mobile phones. TrendForce price prediction for $MU $SKHYNIX $SNDK
This set of data shows the industry is still in a strong cycle, but it also raises a question: how long can high prices last?
Micron: The most complete product and the highest expectations
Micron also operates DRAM, HBM, NAND, and enterprise-grade SSDs. It can benefit from the memory demands of AI servers and also from expanding storage capacity in data centers.
Micron's revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 reached $41.46 billion, setting a new company record. The company also provided a stronger outlook for the fourth quarter, stating that HBM4 has entered a phase of high-volume shipments, HBM4E is under development, and mass production is expected in 2027. Micron's financial report for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026
Another advantage of Micron comes from its domestic manufacturing footprint in the United States. The company plans to expand its U.S. DRAM capacity, which will not only help reduce supply chain risks but may also secure policy support and long-term orders from large customers.
However, Micron's stock price has fully reflected the industry's recovery and growing AI demand. In the future, the market will not only look at revenue growth, but also on whether profit margins can be maintained, whether capital expenditures spiral out of control, and when new capacity will come online. If the company's performance only meets expectations, the stock price may still come under pressure.
SanDisk: Betting on NAND and Enterprise SSDs
SanDisk's business focus is on NAND Flash and SSDs. Compared to Micron and SK Hynix, SanDisk has less direct involvement in HBM, but is more sensitive to NAND prices and enterprise SSD demand.
SanDisk's revenue for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026 reached $5.95 billion, a 97% quarter-over-quarter increase, with data center business up 233%. The company expects fourth-quarter revenue of $7.75 billion to $8.25 billion. SanDisk's financial report for the third quarter of fiscal year 2026
AI data centers need more than just GPUs and HBMs. The datasets generated by model training need to be stored long-term, inference services need to frequently read model files, and caching systems require larger SSD capacity. As long as data centers continue to expand, enterprise SSDs have strong growth potential.
SanDisk's characteristic is its high earnings flexibility. When NAND prices rise, company profits may grow rapidly; However, when supply and demand shift, profits may also decline rapidly. It is more like a highly volatile storage price target, suitable for investors who are optimistic about the NAND cycle and can also tolerate larger drawdowns.
SK Hynix: HBM is the most competitive feature
SK Hynix's strongest business at present remains HBM. In the first quarter of 2026, the company's revenue reached 52.58 trillion KRW, operating profit reached 37.61 trillion KRW, and an operating margin of 72%, setting a new record. SK Hynix's Q1 2026 financial report
SK Hynix has advantages in HBM products, customer relationships, and mass production experience. As AI applications expand from model training to real-time inference, the company's growth has also begun to extend from HBM to server DRAM, eSSD, and other high-capacity storage products.
But competition from HBM is intensifying. Micron and Samsung are both increasing capacity and yield, and customers may also reduce procurement risks by bringing in more suppliers. SK Hynix's current high profit margins are built on technological leadership and tight supply. If competitors close the gap or HBM prices begin to fall, the company's valuation could face double pressure.我妈的同事退休金全买了比特币，现在天天请我们吃饭
上周末家庭聚餐的时候她一直在说
「年轻人就要胆子大」
但我想说的是这个位置其实很多人的胆量已经被磨没了
资金费率显示BTC和ETH仍然处于看跌区间
什么意思呢
就是做多的人要付钱给做空的人
说明市场上大部分人还是偏空的
但奇怪的是BTC这周不但没跌反而涨了0.6%
然后你猜怎么着
这种「看跌但不跌」的行情其实是最考验人的
如果你的分析告诉你应该看多
但市场情绪一直在说看空
你会信哪个
我自己的经验是
跟着数据走不要跟着情绪走
5个买入信号对0个卖出信号
这个数据不会骗人
虽然ETF在流出225M
但BTC价格不跌
说明OTC和现货买盘在接盘
这是机构在悄悄吸筹的信号
另外还有一个心理博弈的点
BitMart事件周末发酵了
CEO说自己也是被通知要停运的
MSX创始人又想收购
这种混乱反而说明有些人在低位捡便宜
敢在恐慌时接盘的人往往是大赢家
所以我的判断是
这个位置不要在情绪上被别人带着走
资金费率看跌≠价格会跌
有时候大家都看跌的时候反而是最好的建仓窗口
等所有人都看涨了Trump halted the airstrikes, oil prices plummeted, and $BTC actually rose
Thirteen consecutive days of airstrikes stopped just like that.
On the 24th, Trump directly ordered that no new strikes against Iran would be launched that day. Following the news, WTI crude oil plunged nearly 4% in grey market trading, while Brent dropped more than 3%. BTC, on the other hand, has risen from around 63,800 to around 64,460.
The logic makes sense—oil prices fall→ inflation expectations cool, → risk assets catch their breath.
But don't get too happy too soon. Trump's exact words: "If we cannot get 100% of what we want from Iran, we will absolutely consider resuming a full-scale war." "And the Strait of Hormuz has not yet reopened.
In the short term, you can gamble for a rebound, but set stop-losses. Don't mistake tactical pauses for strategic peace.
Let's talk in the comments—do you think this rebound can last? Or is it just the calm before the storm? 科技巨头集体回调：今天这些股票为啥都跌了？
今天打开行情一看，一片红色刺眼——美光科技（MU）重挫超7%、英特尔（INTC）暴跌12%、闪迪（SNDK）跌近11%、特斯拉（TSLA）也下跌2.2%，就连英伟达（NVDA）都没能独善其身，小幅回落近1%。半导体和新能源车两大热门板块同时遇冷，在我看来，这波调整其实是必然的获利了结+板块轮动。今年以来，AI概念股涨幅惊人，英伟达等一众芯片巨头早已透支了部分乐观预期。近期市场开始担心AI资本开支增速可能放缓，美光和英特尔作为记忆体与传统芯片代表，自然首当其冲。英特尔跌得最狠，除了行业压力外，可能还反映了市场对其竞争力和转型进展的持续质疑。特斯拉则受新能源车板块整体疲软拖累，交付数据和Robotaxi叙事暂时难以提振信心。更深层看，这是高估值板块的正常呼吸。科技股涨得太猛，资金需要喘口气，转向其他被低估的领域也很合理。宏观面上，利率预期、通胀数据或地缘因素也可能加剧了短期风险偏好下降。个人观点：短期回调不必过于悲观，尤其是英伟达，基本面依然强劲，AI长期需求仍在。真正需要警惕的是英特尔和部分跟风股，如果没有实质性改善，调整可能更深。但对优质标的来说，这往往是“洗盘”而非“转势”。长鑫还没正式开盘，X上的多空已经打起来了。 有人准备借30万元闪电贷梭哈，也有公开地址压下超过1300万美元空单；中文区讨论中签能赚多少，英文区围绕Hyperliquid盘前合约，已经把长鑫的估值交易到接近3万亿元。 我整理了31条中英文推文，逐条核对了发行数据、财务表现、产业消息、盘前价格和市场传闻。 我不准备先猜一个简单的涨跌答案。真正需要回答的是： 长鑫到底值多少？ 3万亿预期是怎么形成的？ 哪些高流量消息可以相信？ 开盘以后，又该盯住哪些数据？ 一、31条推文，讨论最多的其实不是长鑫的技术 这31条推文并不是全市场民调。 我筛选的是上市前浏览量较高，或者能代表某类观点的内容。其中中文推文20条，英文及其他语言11条；22条浏览超过5万，14条超过10万，9条超过20万。 把它们分类后，结果很直接： - 10条在谈交易计划和散户情绪； - 9条在谈估值与盘前价格； - 7条在谈公司和产业； - 5条属于传闻或者商业推广。 接近三分之二的内容，都在讨论价格、仓位和“能赚多少”。 公司真正做到了什么，反而不是流量中心。 浏览量最高的是英文账号[@zephyr_z9] 问题是，后面这些🛰 Jin Shi Radar | 21:49
Topic: Hormuz
According to Jinshi Express, [Saudi media: Iran claims it has not withdrawn from negotiations and is willing to continue talks with the U.S. in multiple locations in Geneva] Jinshi Data, July 26 — According to reports from Satellite Arabi and Saudi media Hadas, Iran has informed Pakistani officials that it has not withdrawn from negotiations but has temporarily suspended them. Iran reiterated the necessity of resuming negotiations during the stalemate phase and stated its refusal to open new shipping lanes in the Strait of Hormuz. In addition, Iran has confirmed to Pakistan its willingness to continue negotiations (with the United States) in Geneva, Doha, Qatar, or Islamabad; And requested the restoration of...
Perspective: First, see if such news affects oil prices, the US dollar, or US stocks' risk appetite, then observe BTC/ETH following the trend.
Verification point: If no subsequent confirmation of price, trading volume, or safe-haven assets is made, treat it as a background variable and do not treat the title as a trading signal.
For market observation purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.$BASED — RECOVERY STRUCTURE FORMING
BASED is trading near $0.08386 after a moderate intraday pullback. The present price area could become a short-term recovery zone if buyers defend support and begin producing stronger volume.
TRADE SETUP
EP: $0.0831 – $0.0843
TP1: $0.0864
TP2: $0.0889
TP3: $0.0922
SL: $0.0804
Holding above the entry range could allow BASED to challenge TP1. A confirmed breakout above $0.0864 may attract additional momentum and open the way toward $0.0889 and $DOGE $BASED .On July 26th, before dawn at five o'clock, the light had not yet fully penetrated the window,
the numbers on the screen hovered between 64590.5 and 63806.4, as if caught by the sticky summer night of this city, moving up and down by less than one percent. The 24-hour trading volume was about 168 million USDT, neither too big nor too small, just enough for the candlestick chart to draw a few lazy shadows. No one shouted in surprise, nor did anyone panic. In this nearly frozen market, a statistic quietly refreshed: ten listed companies collectively hold over one million bitcoins.
An integer milestone arrived silently. Strategy still sits at the top — 843,775 coins, worth about $58 billion at current prices. This number itself carries a distant echo, reminiscent of the market stir when MicroStrategy first bought Bitcoin in the summer of 2020. In the years since, from El Salvador to pension funds, from spot ETF approvals to now SpaceX quietly holding over 18,000 coins and having listed on Nasdaq just over a month ago. The institutional narrative of Bitcoin has grown so thick that it’s almost hard to remember it was once just a whitepaper attachment in a cypherpunk mailing list.
But on the other side of the screen, the stock price curves tell a completely different story. Since 2026, Riot Platforms rose 73%, Cleanspark 39%, Mara Holdings 31%; meanwhile, Strategy fell 40%, Metaplanet dropped 49%, Twenty One Capital down 48%, Coinbase Global down 31%. The largest holders saw the steepest declines; the miners’ gains seem to respond to some kind of revaluation of infrastructure value. The logic here is unclear and should not be simplified to a single cause. Perhaps it’s leverage structures, cash flow pressures, market sentiment rotation, or just a long and ordinary value reassessment in summer.
Fragmented news trickled in. Bitcoin ETF weekly trading volume has fallen to the lowest level since October 2024, while Ethereum ETF just ended five consecutive days of inflows, but weekly net inflows continue to extend — capital seems more willing to chase that delayed resilience. On the other side, an address went long with 38.55 million USDT, held for eighteen hours, and finally closed at a 1% stop-loss, losing $368,000, clean and neat like a nap without dreams. No heroic heavy positions held, no dramatic short reversals, just a string of numbers automatically disappearing after hitting a threshold.
The entire market seems to have entered a subtle silent period. Bitcoin’s DeFi locked value rose slightly by 0.72% near $4.394 billion, like the water level of a lake slowly rising after the rainy season, with no sign of rushing currents. And that "one million" integer is itself just a statistical magic under a certain perspective — how many of these bitcoins held by companies are long-term chips in cold wallets, how many are underlying assets of derivatives, and how many might be sold off anytime due to earnings pressure, no one can really say.
The last such dull summer was 2023, and before that 2019. In every cycle, summer always feels especially long. The list of holders changes, holding costs change, relative stock strength changes. The only thing that’s not easy to change is the bitcoins themselves, quietly lying on the chain, confirmed every ten minutes, occasionally stirring blockchain explorers due to a large transfer. They don’t speak, nor do they care whether they exist in a listed company’s treasury or an anonymous whale’s wallet.
When the heat finally fades and autumn volatility returns to the market, this holding list will probably show new names and new numbers again. Any structure that seems unshakable now is only temporary in the face of time. For those watching the screen, the only thing to remember is: the story is not over, the positions in hand are not settled, and history gives no guarantees.Trump's $1.4 billion in crypto revenue is killing the CLARITY Act
If the bill fails, the culprit is Chuanzi
The CLARITY Act is very likely to miss the August recess.
It's not a technical issue, not a vote count issue—it's Trump's own $1.4 billion in crypto revenue stuck there.
Bloomberg reported today: Trump made about $1.4 billion from meme coins and token businesses, which have now become the biggest obstacle to the bill's passage. The Democrats are demanding stricter moral clauses—the president cannot issue coins while legislating under his own administration's supervision.
The Republicans have only 53 seats in the Senate, and to surpass 60 votes, they need to bring in at least seven Democrats. But the Democrats are now clinging to Trump's crypto income, and both sides are at a stalemate.
The probability of passing on Polymarket has dropped from 74% in May to only about 33%. The market is voting with money.
The irony is—the TRUMP coin issued by Trump himself has now become a stumbling block for him to push through crypto legislation. The coins you issued blocked your own bill.
This drama still needs to be watched. But one thing is certain: the bill is very unlikely to pass before the August recess.
Let's talk in the comments: do you think Trump will sell his coins for the bill, or would he rather pass the bill than keep it?
$BTC $ETH 7月26日｜BTC数据晚报
BTC行情
BTC报 64,450美元附近，日内最高约 64,566美元、最低约 64,028美元，24小时上涨约 0.8%。价格继续围绕64,000—65,000美元震荡，尚未摆脱近期整理区间。
ETF资金
7月24日，美国现货BTC ETF合计净流出约 2.401亿美元，连续第二个交易日净流出；7月23日至24日累计净流出约 4.652亿美元。
此前连续7个交易日的资金回流已经中断，机构资金短期由连续流入转为连续撤出。
链上筹码（地址口径）
按7月25日至26日连续快照计算：
10 BTC以下：净减少约 65 BTC，最新总持仓约 347.22万 BTC
10—100 BTC：净增加约 182 BTC，最新总持仓约 423.24万 BTC
100 BTC以上：净增加约 108 BTC，最新总持仓约 1,235.42万 BTC
100 BTC以上内部变化：
100—1,000 BTC：净减少约 1,904 BTC
1,000—10,000 BTC：净增加约 1,878 BTC
10,000—100,000 BTC：净增加约 134 BTC
100,000 BTC以上：基本不变
100 BTC以上总持仓仅增加108 BTC，但内部迁移明显，主要表现为100—1,000 BTC档减少，1,000 BTC以上档位增加。
交易所BTC
最新公开快照显示，全交易所BTC余额约 270.32万枚，净流量约为 净流出3,075 BTC。
交易所余额仍处于净流出状态，与ETF连续两日净流出形成分化：链上可售筹码减少，但传统资金渠道短期转弱。
合约数据
BTC合约未平仓量约 485.3亿美元，24小时合约成交约 196.96亿美元，现货成交约 11.24亿美元，BTC合约爆仓约 636.6万美元。
未平仓量仍处于较高水平，但周末成交和爆仓规模均不大，市场暂时没有出现明显的集中去杠杆。
今日重要消息
下周美联储、日本央行和英国央行将陆续公布利率决定。与此同时，中东局势推动油价升至每桶100美元附近，能源价格重新推高通胀预期，市场开始增加对进一步加息的押注。高油价与高利率预期仍是BTC近期最重要的外部压力。
BitMart宣布结束九年运营，8月26日停止全部交易，2027年1月31日正式关闭；这是继BitMEX之后，一周内第二家交易平台宣布退出。BitMart此前报告的24小时成交约16亿美元，连续出现交易所关闭，可能继续影响市场对中小平台的信任和资金集中趋势。
俄罗斯最大银行Sberbank计划在12月前建立加密交易及托管基础设施。俄罗斯新的加密交易、托管和结算规则将于9月生效，说明大型传统银行继续进入受监管的加密资产服务领域，但短期对BTC资金面的直接影响有限。
接下来主要看
BTC能否重新站稳65,000美元，并突破近期66,000美元附近压力。
ETF周一开盘后能否恢复净流入，还是连续流出进一步扩大。
交易所BTC是否继续净流出，同时100—1,000 BTC地址能否停止减少。
油价若继续维持在100美元附近，并推动美债收益率上升，BTC的宏观压力仍难明显缓解。
$BTC #星球日报 比特币流动性集中化：山寨季并未到来，只是资金在少数币种间循环
当前市场是否已形成可持续的多头结构，还是仅靠局部杠杆驱动？
核心事实：原始帖子明确指出，当前并非全市场上涨趋势，而是流动性在有限币种之间循环。资金集中于BTC、JELLYJELLY、OPG、SLX、LAB、BSB、ALLO、CHIP等少数代币，而BEAT、EDGE、COAI、TRUMP、RAVE等大量山寨币正在失速。ETH、SOL、TAO、WLD、HYPE、DOGE、ZEC被视为结构性支柱，分别对应机构资金、高Beta风险偏好、AI叙事、风险偏好指标和散户追涨情绪。
市场结构变化：当前定价的核心矛盾在于，BTC在高位维持流动性锚定，但山寨币整体并未形成同步上涨。这导致资金费率出现分化：BTC永续合约资金费率维持正数，但多数山寨币资金费率接近零甚至转负，表明杠杆更多集中在BTC一侧，山寨端缺乏持续性多头加仓。基差方面，BTC期货升水（Contango）结构仍存在，但幅度收敛，暗示市场对远期涨幅预期趋于保守。
定价传导路径：若BTC继续在当前位置横盘整理，资金将难以向外扩散至山寨币，因为流动性被BTC吸收后，山寨币需依赖更低的估值或更强的叙事才能吸引增量资金。反之，若BTC出现显著回调，可能触发多头踩踏，导致杠杆集中清算，进而拖累ETH和SOL等主流币，形成系统性回调。山寨币中，JELLYJELLY、OPG等强流动性标的可能在BTC横盘期间维持相对强势，但BEAT、EDGE等失速币种若无法获得新资金注入，大概率继续下行。
偏多路径与条件：若BTC资金费率维持正值且基差重新走阔，表明杠杆多头持续增仓，市场可能进入局部趋势延续。此时需观察JELLYJELLY、OPG等是否出现成交量放大后的持续推升，以及失速币种是否出现底部放量止跌。偏空路径与条件：若BTC资金费率快速转负或基差收窄至平水以下，暗示多头信心瓦解，可能引发连锁清算。同时需警惕失速币种加速下跌，导致山寨端整体风险偏好崩塌。
风险提示：当前市场结构高度依赖BTC流动性锚定，若BTC失守关键支撑位，可能引发全市场去杠杆。失速币种若持续缩量，将难以形成有效反弹。
$BTC $ETH $SOL $HYPE $DOGE #流动性集中 #杠杆结构 #山寨币分化📊 $LIT Quick Overview of Liquidations
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $50.73
· 4 hours: $2,484.51
· 12 hours: $5,236.94
· 24 hours: $27,600
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $50.73 0%
4h $2,428.02 $56.50 97.7%
12h $5,022.43 $214.50 95.9%
24h $13,600 $14,000 49.3%
Duokong interpretation
Short liquidation in 1 hour was $50.73, long position was zero, very small scale; 4-hour and 12-hour long liquidations continue to crush short positions (accounting for 95.9%~97.7%), with prices continuing to fall; However, within 24 hours, short liquidations at $14,000 narrowly overtook the market (accounting for 50.7%), reversing the direction within 12-24 hours and turning into a short squeeze and upward trend. Ultimate winner: Bulls—showing a pattern of "early long selling→ closing short reversal."
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.18% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 9.0% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 18.97% of 24 hours
The distribution of liquidations is obvious: the first 12 hours accounted for only 18.97%, while the 24-hour total volume is 5.27 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that short squeezes surged fiercely between the 12-24 hours (about $22,400 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 81.0% of the whole day). Currently, the market is in the stage of a short squeeze outbreak, with concentrated liquidations on short positions and closing sessions, so attention should be paid to its sustainability.
A one-sentence explanation
$LIT 24-hour short liquidation $14,000, accounting for 50.7% of the total, reversed direction, and the bulls ultimately prevailed.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress ━━━ Night Review · 2026-07-26 ━━━
Shadow Shaman · Hunters on the chain
At the end of the day, logic remains.
🧭 Today's panorama
→ BTC $64,554 24h: +0.86% · ETH $1,888 24h: +1.71% · SOL $74.92
→ Today's Volatility: BTC 0.64K ($63,996-$64,637)
→ Trading volume: BTC $1.87B · Funding rate: BTC 0.001% / ETH 0.001%
📊 Structural changes
• OI: $2.035B (31,524 BTC), no significant increase or decrease throughout the day
• Funding rate: Both currencies have rates at <0.0011%, at an absolute low with no directional pressure
• BTC Premium: -0.055% (slight discount), bears slightly taking the initiative but showing no aggressive intent
🔥 Today's highlights
• #1 DCA (BSC) +9.11% — 24-hour gain over 4000%, but MCap only $184K, 42% of shares share the same source, showing obvious signs of manipulation
• #2 PONS (XLayer) +5.59% — MCap $54.6 million, one of the largest memes in the XLayer ecosystem, saw a slight rise today
• TRUMP2028 (Solana) +1.29% — 5,306 token-holding addresses, maintaining popularity but with modest gains
• BullPad (Solana) -27.47% — Previously surging memes experienced a deep pullback today, a typical "catch knife scene"
⚡ Smart money flows
• Smart money on Solana today mainly focused on SalaryCat (bought at $1,487), but has already sold 70%, showing a clear pattern of fast in and out of stock
• Justice For Sara Gilson (Sara) was chased by 10 smart money addresses, with 82% having sold out
• Overall, Smart Money was doing short-term harvesting in the Solana meme layer with a "grab a hand, then exit" strategy, with no intention to hold overnight
💡 Shadows recoil
BTC followed a standard contracting sideways movement today—$64K spent the day within 40 points. OI remains unchanged, rates are flat, and premiums are discounted but only slightly increased, indicating that both bulls and bears are controlling their positions. Guessing the direction at this position is no different from guessing a coin; the bulls haven't exerted momentum, and the bears haven't broken through.
Memes on the hot topic side are lively, but the DCA market with 42% of the same source is clearly a trap—whoever chases the most here is caught by a flying knife. Smart money showed no intention of staying overnight at the Solana meme level today; after the rally, it left. This sentiment transmitted to the main board signaled "no incremental funds entering the market."
Tonight, I chose to continue observing. If BTC can shrink above $64K and grind for another day, the structure would actually be healthier. No matter how sharp or down, I won't take it.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📡 Shadow Shaman · Hunters on the chain
#暗影萨满🔥 From 46 to 142, then back to 79! $OKB This wave isn't a pullback; it's like rubbing the chives down and handing over a cigarette!
Guys, who wouldn't be confused by this $OKB script from July?
📉 At the beginning of the month (that needle in early July): still lying flat at 46 cuts, playing dead.
🔥 Then OKX set off a fire: burning 278.9 million $OKB, permanently welding the total at 21 million.
🚀 The price rocketed straight in: soaring to $142.88, a 193% massive syllable sold out all the bears.
💀 And then? : Fell back to around 79, and has been grinding for almost three weeks. With 24-hour trading volume shrinking to just over 50 million, retail investors are all asking, "Is this over?" ”
#OKX.ai: One person is a world-class company
---
🧬 Let me tell you, this trend is wild, and behind it are three hard logics clashing:
1. Supply side: OKX has fully transcribed Bitcoin's scarcity scenario
The total supply of 21 million was locked, and the smart contract completely blocked both the additional issuance and manual burning. X Layer's gas is still burning in small amounts. What does this mean? OKB won't be reborn; it will only become fewer. How many exchanges have you seen in history with fixed total supply tokens?
2. Demand Side: Bet on the entire ecosystem, fail or die
OKX cut OKT Chain and bet all on X Layer (Polygon CDK's zkEVM). OKB becomes the only fuel in the entire ecosystem + fee discounts + Jumpstart tickets. ICE (NYSE's real father) even came in to take a stand. This isn't just empty promises; it's just putting on a stage.
3. Market Volume: A typical shakeout after a surge, waiting for the big players to speak
The 50-day moving average at $79 is holding down, the 200-day moving average at $88 is holding down, and the RSI at 56 is lukewarm. This is the kind of being repeatedly rubbed in the middle, washing away those who are uncertain.
#OKX星球话题来啦
---
🗣️ My rough summary of the summary:
If you shout "reset to zero," wake up. An exchange token with a total supply of 21 million + full ecosystem gas is unprecedented in history.
If you're shouting "Breaking 200 soon," don't even dream about it. Before BTC doesn't cooperate and X Layer doesn't have daily active users, the grueling 79-82 range will have to stay for a while.
What stage is it now?
The Fear and Greed Index once dropped to 23 (extreme fear), retail investors are cutting losses, and large players are hesitating. A typical "no chase when prices rise, no buying when prices fall" — a twisted phase.
OKB is no longer a junk platform coin; it is a monster forcibly transformed by OKX into an "exchange-style BTC." In the short term, it will be dragged by the broader market; in the medium term, it depends on whether X Layer has real users; in the long term, it depends on whether the 21 million figure is enough to tell a story.
👇 Now the question arises:
Do you think OKB really dropped completely this round and is preparing for a second firing, or will they fake a fall and continue sawing wood at 78-82?
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard
Chart analysis:
1. Long-term trend: Previously completed a deep bear market decline from a high of 104.63, with a maximum drawdown exceeding 30%.
2. Short-term structure: After bottoming out at 70, a recovery rebound began, and the current price has broken above all short-term moving averages, indicating a recovery in short-term bullish momentum
3. Resistance and support: First resistance above at 85, support below at 81-82 (MA5/MA10 moving averages)📊 JUST IN: Saylor Hints At More Bitcoin, But The Reality Is Sharper Now
"We're gonna need another color." Classic Saylor confidence, posted with a dashboard of Strategy's 843,775 BTC. But the numbers behind that swagger tell a harder story than the meme suggests.
📉 Where it stands:
Holdings: 843,775 BTC
Average cost: $75,653
Unrealized loss: about 14.8%, roughly $9.5 billion
Q2 digital asset loss: $8.32 billion, mostly unrealized
Here's what actually changed, and it matters. The "never sell" narrative is over. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC in early July for about $216 million, using the proceeds to fund preferred stock dividends and rebuild its dollar reserve. This followed a formal Bitcoin monetization program launched June 29 that lets the company sell up to $1.25 billion of BTC to cover obligations. A company built on the promise of relentless accumulation is now selling to pay its bills. That is a real shift, not a headline.
None of this means the long-term thesis is broken, and that's the honest takeaway. These losses are unrealized, the CFO says the reserve could cover net debt even if BTC fell 91%, and Strategy has still added coins across the cycle. The lesson worth borrowing is conviction and dollar-cost averaging over years, using capital you won't need tomorrow. The lesson to avoid is the leverage, the forced sales, and treating one confident tweet as a buy signal.
What to watch:
Whether Strategy keeps selling under the monetization program or resumes buying.
The health of its preferred stock and any pressure on MSTR shares, down 77% from the high.
A confident post from the biggest holder is not a catalyst. Respect the conviction, watch the balance sheet, because structure decides who survives a bear market.
Conviction that pays off, or a model meeting its limits?
Not financial advice. $BTC $ETH $SOL The list of bankruptcies continues to grow!
On July 23, @BitMEX announced that its operations would be closed starting from 04:00:00 UTC on September 23, 2026.
On July 24, @odosprotocol announced that the app would switch to read-only mode on July 27, and all Odos services would be permanently shut down on July 30, 2026.
July 25 @dango announced the termination of the project. On Wednesday, August 13, at 12:00 UTC, the Dango L1 blockchain will cease operations.
On July 25, Poolin @officialpoolin, once the world's largest Bitcoin mining pool, filed for bankruptcy.
July 26 @BitMartExchange Announced that all trading services will cease on August 26, 2026, 01:00 UTC. On January 31, 2027, 15:59 UTC: Platform operations will officially cease.
Looking at these death lists, there are basically two types of deaths:
1⃣ Fake demand is exposed; in a bull market, just start financing with infrastructure or aggregators, but in a bear market, it's clear there is no commercial closed loop.
2⃣ Leverage backfired, and Coinyin, which seemed stable as a leveraged method, was also wiped out. It could have jumped on this AI wave and sold at a good price, but unfortunately, it died before dawn.
In the second half of a bear market, if you can hold your capital and avoid pitfalls, you've already outperformed 90% of people.📊 $ZEC 爆仓速览
爆仓规模
· 1小时：$3,530.82
· 4小时：$4.90万
· 12小时：$19.16万
· 24小时：$57.41万
多空分布
周期 多头爆仓 空头爆仓 多头占比
1h $3,530.82 $0 100%
4h $4,686.80 $4.43万 9.6%
12h $1.14万 $18.02万 5.9%
24h $9.39万 $48.02万 16.4%
多空解读
1小时多头爆仓占100%（$3,530.82），但规模极小可忽略；4小时起空头爆仓骤然碾压多头（占90.4%），逼空行情启动；12小时空头占比高达94.1%，为全天最剧烈逼空窗口；24小时空头爆仓$48.02万（占83.7%），逼空贯穿后程。最终胜出方：多头——呈现“短时扰动→持续极端逼空”格局，空头遭毁灭性清算。
时间分布
· 1小时占24小时的 0.62%
· 4小时占24小时的 8.54%
· 12小时占24小时的 33.38%
爆仓集中于12小时周期（约三分之一），但24小时总量是12小时的3.00倍，说明逼空行情在12-24小时间猛烈升级（后12小时爆仓约$38.25万，占全天的66.6%）。当前处于逼空行情高潮阶段，空头遭重创，但极端涨幅后需警惕剧烈回调风险。
一句话解读
$ZEC 24小时空头爆仓$48.02万占总量83.7%，逼空行情主导且后程升级，多头完胜。
🔥 市场风向标 | 7月24日
今日三条热点，指向同一主题：AI的代价、监管的搁浅，以及地缘悬崖边的喘息。
📊 谷歌与特斯拉：AI盛宴的“账单”来了
两份财报揭开了AI叙事的残酷真相。
谷歌超预期但代价沉重：总营收1198亿美元，同比增长24%；谷歌云收入247.7亿美元，同比暴涨82%。然而，资本开支高达449亿美元，自由现金流首次转负至-59亿美元。盘后一度跌近5%。
特斯拉增收不增利：营收282.4亿美元，同比增长26%；但营业利润仅3.98亿美元，同比暴跌57%，运营利润率只剩1.4%。自由现金流两年多来首次转负。盘后跌超4%。
信号：谷歌的AI已在云业务中形成收入闭环；而特斯拉的Robotaxi和Optimus仍停留在“故事”阶段。市场正在惩罚只有概念、没有现金流的AI叙事。
📜 CLARITY法案搁浅：14亿美元的伦理困局
加密行业的监管希望正在消散。参议院共和党虽释放更新文本并加入道德条款，但7名民主党参议员集体否决。参议院多数党领袖图恩明确表示，法案大概率无法在8月7日休会前通过。
根本障碍：特朗普通过加密业务获得的约14亿美元收益成为最大阻力。民主党要求更严格的伦理条款，防止总统在其政府监管下继续从加密行业获利。
Polymarket预测市场显示，年内通过概率已从80%以上骤降至37%。错过8月窗口，拖入秋季选举，2026年通过可能性将大幅下降。
🚢 美军暂停空袭：地缘悬崖边的喘息
当地时间7月25日，特朗普下令美军当天不要对伊朗发动新空袭，结束了此前连续13天的每日打击行动。
暂停空袭前数小时，阿曼代表团已抵达德黑兰，就重启霍尔木兹海峡通航展开谈判，据称已取得进展。布伦特原油此前已突破100美元/桶，若谈判取得突破，油价有望回落。
信号：这是一次战术性暂停——为外交留空间，但美军恢复打击的预案仍在准备中。
💎 总结
三件事勾勒出当下市场的核心矛盾：AI的账单正在到来——谷歌和特斯拉用史上首次负现金流告诉市场，AI烧得比想象中更快；监管的窗口正在关闭——14亿美元的伦理困局让CLARITY法案年内通过希望渺茫；而地缘的喘息能持续多久，取决于阿曼斡旋的成败。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 Trump reported $1.4B+ in crypto income for 2025.
Breakdown from his financial disclosure:
$635M — $TRUMP meme coin sales
$770M— World Liberty Financial
$520M from token sales
$250M from selling business interests
That’s a 9x jump from last year. Crypto is now his largest source of income.
Meanwhile the Senate can’t move the CLARITY Act.
Democrats argue you can’t have a president regulating crypto while making $1B+ from it.
Republicans argue the bill shouldn’t be written around one person.
The current draft would ban sitting officials from issuing or sponsoring new digital assets.
But it doesn’t fully address family-run projects.
Conflict or not — this is why ethics is holding up the biggest crypto bill in years.
NFA. DYOR. Watch the disclosures, not just the charts.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause #EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause Is the crypto world really tough? Or did the US stock market show its weakness first? In the short term, it's exciting to watch, but don't rush to catch up on the signal—whoever acts impulsively in this market will suffer.
Look at the numbers
$BTC 64,440 +0.57% $ETH 1,885 +1.24%
$QQQ -1.12% $SPY +0.10% $IBIT -0.82%
$DXY +0.03% $GLD +0.10%
Crude oil and Hormuz have been shivering, and inflation expectations have never been honest. The crypto world and ETFs are still competing over risk appetite, but once the old scripts of AI and semiconductors flip the page, $QQQ's mood switch can instantly split the entire market. Qian clearly shifted toward defense, $QQQ that bit of energy couldn't hold the court at all.
$ETH Today is more elastic than $BTC, and risk appetite is still struggling to push upward, but $IBIT is a bit weaker than spot trading. ETF funds entering the market have narrowed down, indicating spot stocks aren't as aggressive. $DXY Heads are stubbornly suppressed by risk assets, $GLD still in the red, haven't even escaped all the hedging funds, just keeping a backup plan.
A barrage of analysis is fierce as a tiger, but whether the market rises or falls, Trump is still watched. Don't rush to bet; wait for clearer signals. Whoever shows weakness first will set the direction first. Let's wait and see.
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零Recently, market sentiment has warmed up, and $SHIB has seen a strong rebound. In just two trading days, the price started around $0.0000042, reaching a high of $0.0000058, with a maximum increase of nearly 36% during the range. Its market capitalization rose by about $1 billion simultaneously, reassembling it among the top 30 crypto assets by market cap. Many people simply attribute this round of rally to MEME sector rotational speculation, but considering on-chain, tokenomics, and capital flow data, the market-driven logic is far more complex than surface sentiment. First, let's review SHIB's underlying token framework, which is the foundation for understanding all market trends. The initial total supply of SHIB was 1,000 trillion, with 500 trillion transferred to the Vitalik burn address during launch, laying the foundation for the project's deflationary nature. As of the latest Shibburn on-chain statistics, the total amount burned has reached 410.84 trillion, accounting for 41.08% of the original supply, permanently deprived of the circulating market; Currently, the circulating market supply remains at 589.16 trillion coins. Many market participants tend to misunderstand that continuous burning will quickly cause supply shortages. Objective data clearly shows that early burns exceeding 400 trillion were concentrated in 2021, a one-time large-scale burn, with daily community burns relatively limited in the past year. On the eve of this rally, the daily regular burn volume mostly stayed in the millions of tokens, but during the market kickoff, the 24-hour burn rate surged by up to 1400%, with 6.75 million tokens burned in a single day, and the burning frenzy rapidly heating up.很多玩家炒惯MEME、AI热点币种，转头接触$OKB 很容易踩坑，总疑惑：为啥热点轮番大涨，OKB却经常不温不火？今天掰开聊聊这款平台币底层玩法。 先说底层背景：OKB是OKX交易所原生代币，早就不只是单纯的交易所积分。早期主要作用是手续费抵扣、参与平台新币打新；后续迎来重大升级，总量永久锁定2100万枚，彻底关闭新增铸造通道，同时成为X Layer二层网络原生Gas代币。 简单理解，OKB拥有双重价值底座：一边依托中心化交易所交易手续费回购销毁，一边承接二层公链生态发展需求。对比凭空讲故事的山寨币，它拥有真实持续的业务现金流托底，这也是熊市阶段抗跌性更强的根本原因。 再来理清当下行情核心逻辑： 热点小币种靠游资短期拉盘，情绪来了连续暴涨；但OKB价格紧紧绑定两件事：交易所整体交易量、官方推出的大型生态活动。 市场狂热的时候，资金偏爱弹性巨大的题材币，看不上节奏慢吞吞的平台币；可一旦大盘陷入震荡、行情风险变高，资金就会开始抱团平台币避险。 这就造就了它独一无二的走势特点：暴涨很难，大跌往往也滞后山寨。很难出现单日二三十个点的连续主升浪，更多震荡上行、波段反复拉扯。 未来可以重点跟踪的几⚠️🏅 $YGG /USDT Market Alert 📊
YGG is holding around $0.0186 with improving sentiment. Support lies near $0.0180, while resistance is around $0.0195 and $0.0205. 🎯 Target: $0.0195 → $0.0205 → $0.0220. 🎯 Stop Loss: $0.0177. 🛑 Next Move: A breakout above $0.0195 could spark fresh bullish momentum, while losing support may trigger a short-term pullback. 💯#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #KoreaAIChipPush 📊 $OKB Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $153.74
· 4 hours: $158.06
· 12 hours: $158.06
· 24 hours: $37,600
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $153.74 0%
4h $0 $158.06 0%
12h $0 $158.06 0%
24h $0 $37,600 0%
Duokong interpretation
Short liquidations account for 100% of the cycles, while long liquidations account for zero, indicating an extreme unilateral short squeeze upward trend. In the first 12 hours, liquidation was extremely small (about $154~$158), with mild short squeezes initiating; 24-hour liquidation surged to $37,600, with short squeeze conditions exploding in 12-24 hours. Ultimate winner: Bulls—Bearish and late trading face concentrated and devastating liquidation.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.41% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.42% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 0.42% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely late: the first 12 hours accounted for only 0.42%, while the total 24-hour volume is about 238 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that the short squeeze market exploded in the latter half. Currently, the market is at the peak of a short squeeze, with concentrated liquidations on short positions at the close, but after extreme gains, caution is needed regarding the risk of sharp corrections.
A one-sentence explanation
$OKB 24-hour short liquidation at $37,600, accounting for 100%, followed by explosive upgrades in the following 12 hours, with bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress $BTC futures demand is increasing further. The positive value of futures demand indicates that real demand is emerging.
However, spot demand remains negative. Total demand is negative because the negative value of spot demand is larger.
A real rally must be accompanied by real demand. Currently, real demand is occurring in the futures market but futures market is still negative demand.
A real rally will begin when real demand emerges in the spot market.这究竟是真正的“山寨季”（Altcoin Season），还是又一次情绪诱多的“噪音”？👀
表面上看，绿盘飘红与局部暴涨让市场的 FOMO（恐慌追高）情绪急剧升温。然而，真正的山寨季标志是**全场普涨与流动性全面扩散**。当下我们所经历的，不过是存量资金在极少数标的中的**残酷轮动**，而非增量资金的整体扩容。
主力资金高度集中在极少数头部资产中，而绝大多数代币根本无法获得持续的买盘承接。
### 📊 流动性阵营划分与筹码结构
* **资金强吸筹区（存量聚焦）**：$BTC、$JELLYJELLY、$OPG、$SLX、$LAB、$BSB、$ALLO、$CHIP
* **动能维持区（局部热度）**：$MEME、$EDEN、$HUMA、$ZKP、$METIS
* **动能衰退/滞涨区（缺乏买盘）**：$BEAT、$EDGE、$COAI、$TRUMP、$RAVE、$SPACE、$SOPH、$IP、$AVNT、$ZAMA、$OFC、$PIEVERSE、$VIRTUAL、$ACU、$H、$MEGA
### 🏛️ 核心资产锚点与价值重估
| 标的 | 市场角色与定位 | 最新动态 / 参考基准 |
|---|---|---|
| **$BTC** | **流动性之王 👑** | 现报 **$64,530**（日内微涨 0.92%），全网加密总市值维持在 **$2.18 万亿**，依然是市场的绝对锚点。 |
| **$ETH** | **机构应用乐园** | 现报 **$1,880** 附近，质押锁定量的增加持续削减现货抛压。 |
| **$SOL** | **高 Beta 弹性下注** | 生态活跃度居高不下，仍是寻求超越大盘超额收益的首选战场。 |
| **$TAO / $WLD** | **AI 叙事双雄** | 深度绑定 OpenAI 及全球半导体产业链的最新博弈动态。 |
| **$HYPE** | **风险偏好晴雨表** | 衡量高杠杆与高风险偏好资金流动量的核心指标。 |
| **$DOGE / $ZEC** | **散户情绪与隐私博弈** | 镜面般反映散户风险偏好与隐私规避情绪的起伏。 |
### 📰 宏观驱动与新闻催化剂
1. **监管法案暂缓 (#CLARITYActStalled)**：
美国国会关于加密市场结构的《CLARITY 法案》（H.R. 3633）因涉及利益冲突与严格的道德审查条款，在参议院议程中暂时被推迟至 8 月休会之后。这一政策层面的不确定性，使得大型合规机构在全面进场部署山寨币时表现得更为审慎。
2. **地缘局势暂时缓和 (#USIranStrikePause)**：
美方暂停针对中东特定设施的打击行动，且未再出现新的军事升级，使宏观避险情绪有所释放，油价回落的同时为加密市场提供了喘息的机会。
> **残酷的真相**：只有当流动性全面铺开、市场参与度在各个赛道同步爆发时，真正的山寨季才算到来，而不是仅凭 5 个代币霸占头条。
>
在此之前：**严控风险，顺应资金流向，果断拒绝 FOMO 追高。** 📈
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause 四年没这么安静过了，兄弟们。2017年进场的那些远古巨鲸，终于不砸盘了。不是不砸，是特么砸不动了，该跑的早跑了。刚刚看到数据，休眠的$BTC活动量跌到了2022年三季度以来的最低点。什么概念？2022年那会儿刚从69000崩下来，大家一起装死。现在又来了。说实话，这事儿比任何技术指标都真实。你们想啊，去年底$BTC冲到十几万的时候，OG们疯狂出货，钱包里躺了七八年的币全活了。那波利润兑现完，现在手里要么没货，要么剩的都是零成本仓位。零成本的$BTC，人家急什么？不急着卖。这就是市场的默契。大资金不动，小资金乱窜。山寨季玩得欢，主流币反而稳得一批。我翻了翻链上数据，最近一个月移动的老币少得可怜。上一次这么安静，后面发生了什么？横盘四个月，然后一根大阳线捅破天。别误会，我不是说这次也一样。但有一点很清楚：抛压真的在衰竭。前几个月$BTC跌下来的时候，我说别慌，现在我还是这句话。大饼要真崩，OG们不会这么淡定的。他们最敏感，跑得比谁都快。现在集体装死，说明什么？说明真正的恐慌，还没来。做空的兄弟们自己掂量，你面前是全世界最惜售的一群Holder。他们不卖，你去哪借币砸？当然，牛市不会一天就来Well-known trader Kla tweeted that Bitcoin's cycle is accelerating. In the previous cycle, it took only 476 days to go from bottom to record high, much faster than the previous two rounds. He expects this round to break the previous high ahead of the next halving.
To be honest, the trend of shortening cycles is already quite obvious. The reasons behind this are not hard to guess—institutional funds, ETFs, and macro liquidity are flowing in, causing the market to react much faster than before. Combined with social media and leverage tools, the speed of sentiment and price transmission is simply not on the same level. The old stereotype of "every four years a bull and bear" might really need to be changed now.
However, acceleration has two sides. On one hand, if you're still waiting for some "standard right-side signal," you might miss out on a significant rally in the blink of an eye; On the other hand, acceleration means a stronger pullback, and the probability of getting stuck after chasing highs rises sharply. So instead of getting caught up in left and right sides, it's better to manage your positions well, build positions in batches, set stop-losses, and don't let emotions run wild. As for his mention of "new highs before the halving," I think it's quite likely, but that doesn't mean a big pit won't be hit first. In short, focusing on macro data and capital flows is far more reliable than stubbornly stubbornly obsessing over historical patterns. 😂 📊 $XAUT Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $194.64
· 4 hours: $194.64
· 12 hours: $5,107.83
· 24 hours: $36,000
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $194.64 0%
4h $0 $194.64 0%
12h $60.82 $5,047.01 1.2%
24h $30,800 $5,176.69 85.6%
Duokong interpretation
In the first 12 hours, short liquidation crushed long positions (short positions accounted for 98.8%~100%), and prices continued to rise; Within 24 hours, long positions were liquidated at $30,800, strongly overtaking (accounting for 85.6%), with a sharp reversal occurring within 12-24 hours, turning into a one-sided downtrend. Ultimate winner: Bears—showing a pattern of "short squeeze upward→ surge and pullback, extreme long selling."
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.54% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.54% of 24 hours
· 12 hours account for 14.2% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely late: the first 12 hours accounted for only 14.2%, while the 24-hour total is 7.05 times the 12-hour volume, indicating a strong burst in the 12-24 hours (about $30,900 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 85.8% of the day). Currently, the market is in a bear-led sustained sharp decline, and in the short term, attention should be paid to technical recovery signals after oversold conditions.
A one-sentence explanation
$XAUT 24-hour long liquidation at $30,800, accounting for 85.6% of the total, with an early short squeeze followed by extreme bullish selling at the close, with bears winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress SK Hynix
SK Hynix's stock price has fluctuated sharply, but the AI server has not been equipped with a single HBM block as a result.
SK Hynix is sending samples of 12-layer HBM4E to major customers and collaborating with NVIDIA on next-generation AI memory, expanding its growth strategy from HBM to AI DRAM, NAND, and enterprise-grade SSDs. AI computing power development remains a long-term tailwind, but the market is beginning to worry: whether current storage prices and profit margins are close to cycle highs, and whether price competition will resume after Samsung and Micron's expansions.
US ADRs have recently fluctuated sharply around $156, showing a clear premium over Korean common stocks, indicating investors are not only betting on companies but also paying for scarcity. Technically, focus on support at $150 to $153; if it falls below it, target $145; The main resistance above is $164 to $170.
SK Hynix's long-term logic hasn't disappeared, but the most dangerous short-term thing may be "good news everyone knows." Do you think this is a golden pit for AI memory, or a reminder before the storage cycle shifts?
$SKHY #SK海力士 #HBM #AI早期$ORDI的爆拉，实打实点燃了BRC20铭文第一轮大风口，那一轮行情，市场流动性基本由国内玩家主导。
格局早已今非昔比。如今ORDI不再只是国人博弈的标的，全球比特币生态参与者都会盯着它的涨跌。尤其现阶段符文$DOG持续走弱、叙事乏力，海外资金会进一步巩固ORDI比特币原生资产龙头的定位。
但不要幻想行情立刻启动，ORDI持续震荡洗盘，再磨半年属于合理剧本。即便大级别牛市尚未到来，赛道内局部热点依旧会轮番涌现：Alkanes、Subfrost、Tap-Nat、Radfi、Bound等新兴协议与底层平台，会持续诞生阶段性机会。
赛道叙事不断迭代，热点新旧交替，但ORDI作为比特币生态的情绪锚点，地位短期难以撼动。Changxin Memory's IPO P/E ratio reached 300? Can it still be played?
┈➤ 25-year static P/E ratio
◆ #长鑫存储 Opens tomorrow, issue price 8.66,
◆ New shares 6,688,088,608 million (accounting for 10% of total shares),
◆ Net profit attributable to the parent company at the end of 2015 was 1,874.8594 million yuan.
◆ According to A-share IPO standards, calculate the 25-year static price-to-earnings ratio:
PE=8.66*668,808.8608*10/187,485.94=308.92
But this is static data from the end of 2025, and the market may and should calculate and value based on dynamic data.
┈➤ Rolling P/E ratio for Q2 2025~Q1 2026
◆ Parent company net profit in Q2~Q1 2025
= Full year 2025 + Q1 2026 - Q1 2025
=187,485.94+2,476,203.15-(-155,902.79)
=2,819,591.88
◆ Calculate the rolling price-to-earnings ratio of the IPO price
PE-TTM【25Q2~26Q1】
=8.66*668,808.8608*10/2,819,591.88
=20.54
┈➤ Rolling P/E Ratio for Q3 2025~Q2 2026 (Conservative Estimate)
The parent company's net profit announced for the first half of 2026 is 5,000,000~5,700,000, following a prudent principle and setting the lower limit.
◆ Parent company net profit in Q3~Q2 2026
= Full year 2025 + First half of 2026 - First half of 2025
=187,485.94+5,000,000-(-233,205.82)
=5,420,691.76
◆ Calculate the rolling price-to-earnings ratio of the IPO price
PE-TTM【25Q3~26Q2】
=8.66*668,808.8608*10/5,420,691.76
=10.68┈ ➤ Final note
Cambricon's PE is now 285, with a high of 371.
Hygon Information's PE is currently 267, with a peak of 315.
First, some people compare Changxin Memory to SK Hynix, but there's actually no comparison.
Due to market differences, SK Hynix, as the storage dragon, has a lower P/E ratio than Micron
$MU
Even SanDisk $SNDK. This is due to the environmental and sentiment differences between the Korean and US stock markets.
Therefore, you can't compare Changxin Memory to SK Hynix. You can refer to AI stocks on the A-share market,
Cambricon's PE is now 285, with a high of 371.
Hygon Information's PE is currently 267, with a peak of 315.
Second, based on profits at the end of 2025, Changxin Memory's P/E ratio is 308.9.
However, the market may value based on updated data.
Based on Q2 2025~Q1 2026, the rolling P/E ratio is 20.54. Based on a cautious estimate from Q3 2025~Q2 2026, the rolling P/E ratio is 10.68.
Therefore, after the market opens, Changxin Memory Technologies theoretically still has some room to rise.
Third, the overall trend of the storage sector is still uncertain whether it has bottomed out.
Fourth, Changxin Memory's main product is DRAM. Compared to HBM, AI may have a weaker rigid demand for DRAM.
Fifth, Changxin Memory was still operating at a loss in the first half of 2025, with profits surging in 2026. Whether this sharp upward trend can be sustained will only be proven over time.
Brother Bee has never played with the A-share market and has little say, but theoretically, Changxin Memory should have no problem reaching 17 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] about 20).
Optimistically, it could reach around 40 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] about 50).
If extremely optimistic, it could exceed 70 or even reach 80 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] close to 100).
The reason for such a large valuation gap is the huge profit gap between 2025 and 2026. Whether this growth trend will explode in the short term or continue in the long term remains uncertain.Guys, YGG rose 4.21% today, currently priced at $0.01854. Behind this bullish candlestick, the core catalyst comes from expectations of a strategic restructuring of the project: on July 7, YGG officially announced the closure of its game publishing division YGG Play, laying off 35 employees, and games like LOL Land will officially delaunch on July 31. This move is not a project crisis, but rather a shift in focus to AI game behavior data services, with player behavior datasets usable for AI model training, and the market speculating on its long-term potential to enter the AI data track. Technical Aspects: Support at 0.0185-0.0187; resistance above is seen at 0.0192/0.0200/0.0210, with the previous high at 0.0212 forming strong resistance; Below is a key defensive position at 0.0175. Core risk: Trading volume heavily depends on the futures market, with contract size significantly higher than spot trading. Leverage funds dominate the market, making the structure fragile and causing amplified volatility. With only a few days left until YGG Play officially shuts down on July 31, the market is weighing the narrative expectations of transformation, and caution is needed to watch out for selling pressure that may materialize after the event materializes. Key point: Currently, the AI data business is still in the strategic planning stage and has no revenue from implementation; At the same time, YGG tokens do not have the capability to capture business revenue. These are event-driven, high-volatility short-term targets, with the bottom line of the game being fast in and out. Do not mistake short-term thematic rebounds for trend reversals; strictly manage positions and risks. Personal market viewsToday, seeing BitMex and BitMart both cease operations one after another is somewhat disappointing. During the year-long slow bear market, many Web3 projects have disappeared or reskinned, and hot money in the market is gradually flowing into the AI field
I think the reason these two exchanges shut down in the same week despite such a coincidence is another reason:
1. Liquidity is concentrated in leading exchanges, so most retail investors and whales usually choose platforms with the deepest orders, lowest slippage, and the most counterparties. The worse the liquidity, the fewer users there are; the fewer users, the further the number of users drops, and then you step on the right foot and enter a death spiral.
2. Hyperliquid, an on-chain trading platform, is eating into CEX's market share. Traders can self-custody assets on these DEXs, and platform rules and reserves are more transparent. This makes it even harder for established contract exchanges without a spot ecosystem or institutional custody business to survive
3. Rising compliance costs. The old Cayman registration and global service approach no longer works. Web3 ecosystems in Europe, North America, Singapore, and Hong Kong are all becoming more standardized, inevitably leading to companies like Bitmex, which lag behind and have to stop operations in Europe due to compliance issues
4. The platform token begins to backlash, another death spiral: when the exchange faces operational difficulties, the price of the platform token falls, then the decline leads users to reduce holdings, collateral and financial reserves are compiled, the market doubts the platform's solvency, and then it stamps on the right again until it hits rock bottom
It is unclear whether the halts of these two exchanges have reached the bottom of the bear market or have only just begun. But no matter what, I still hope the industry keeps getting better, that everyone can make money and have something to eat#新手必看：这里有你需要的一切
今天看到 RootData 发布的最新统计，2026 年年内已经有 99 个加密项目宣布停止运营、破产或网站彻底瘫痪。名单里不乏大家耳熟能详的名字：从老牌合约衍生品平台 BitMEX、BitMart、AscendEX，到极好用的链上看板和钱包工具 Zapper、Parsec、Leap、Ctrl，再到 DeFi 协议 Stream Finance 和 Altura。
看完这 99 个死亡名单，说实话，我不仅没感到悲观，反倒觉得这是行业高利率环境下极具血腥、但也极为健康的“去水分大清洗”。
仔细拆解这些死亡项目的特征，背后只有一条极其残酷的铁律：靠讲故事和代币印钞补贴存活的时代过去了。
这 99 个项目的死亡，主要踩中了三大致死病因：
第一个死因，是纯前端工具协议的“价值捕获黑洞”。像 Zapper、Parsec、Leap 这种看板和钱包，产品体验确实不错，但纯前端缺乏原生代币的利益捕获机制，没有商业闭环。在熊市和存量博弈期，高昂的节点与服务器运维成本直接把团队现金流给耗干了。
第二个死因，是通胀庞氏挖矿的彻底失效。Stream Finance 这类协议，过去靠印自己的治理代币给高 APY 吸引流动性。但在 10 年美债 4.7% 的无风险利率压制下，聪明资金宁可拿着美债，也不愿意去陪你玩空气代币通胀的游戏。补贴一停，池子立刻沦为死城。
第三个死因，是二线 CEX 的流动性流失与合规反噬。随着 Solana 链上 DEX 交易量超越传统合规 CEX，加上 BitMEX 诉讼等监管合规成本飙升，中小型 CEX 的生存空间被链上 DEX 和头部合规巨头双向挤压，流动性枯竭后只能破产离场。
我的结论：这 99 个项目的集体死亡，是市场在帮你做清洗删减。未来能活下来的，要么是底层具备极强网络效应的头部公链/DEX，要么是能源源不断创造真实法币收入（Real Revenue）和协议分红的 Real Yield 蓝筹。
这 99 个死亡项目里，有你曾经用过或踩过坑的吗？欢迎在评论区聊聊。The essence of TSLA's plunge is: the market is not denying Tesla's future,
Instead, it is about requiring these future businesses to be reflected in the financial statements faster and more clearly.
The necessary conditions for Tesla's rise are: smooth rollout of FSD v15, large-scale operation of Robotaxi,
Optimus ramp-up — at least two of the three have achieved substantial breakthroughs.
The full condition for the rise is that, alongside the breakthrough, automotive gross margins stabilize and free cash flow improve, leading the market to believe that the "cash-burning phase" is about to end.
Currently, Tesla is in a painful period of shifting from "car sales stories" to "AI stories."
The market is willing to wait, but it will not wait indefinitely. Every quarterly report that follows is a major test of whether the story can become reality. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time? $TSLA STRC的纸面亏损昨天直接炸了群一个 treasury 的账面数字硬生生把优先股折价拉成了全行业的信用测试说实话 看到Strive持仓曝光的那一刻我就觉得这事儿没那么简单不是一家公司的压力是所有人的问题$BTC 跌破支撑的时候那些拿着纸面利润讲故事的人突然发现自己的优先股变成了烫手山芋折价率拉得比想象中快多了流动性一抽整个比特币 treasury 的估值模型都在发抖姐妹们稳住不是我要制造焦虑是这种传染性真的太快了一家 treasury 的账面亏损就能让整个某机构重新定价比特币持仓的风险去年还在吹的资产负债表管理今年全变成了紧箍咒关键不是你手里有没有$MSTR而是类似模式的 treasury 都在被重新评估STRC只是第一个倒下的多米诺后面还有一堆在用同样逻辑滚雪球我现在不追高也不急着割先看今晚美股的反应如果连优先股折价都没人接那才是真正的大麻烦 treasury 还有救吗 这个话题你们站哪边？ #芯片股反弹，美股空头仓位创历史新高 #加密行情回暖，比特币走高 #美股全线走高，加密股领涨 这次没有出现一个让我愿意提高关注级别的新名字，反而是两个旧观察项给了完全不同的信号。
HBULL 目前约 $0.00157，市值约 $150 万，流动性约 $12.5 万，24 小时成交约 $87.2 万。真实交易还在，但 RugCheck 新提示一个地址持有 25.83%。项目方称大额代币位于质押金库，可我暂时没能独立确认这个地址与已公开质押程序的对应关系。主池流动性凭证约 97.97% 锁定，增发和冻结权限已撤销；在大额地址用途被证明之前，我只把它当普通观察。
合约：7V6Sk63y8Rr1MvcN5mYNp61wgFhy4EeQg5gUASk9pump
https://dexscreener.com/solana/edx18gjcdijqslaja2pp5c2vma3btrrx4utxkejufrtq
BUB 更早，也更危险。约四小时内持币地址从 1,027 增到 2,292，独立交易者约 3,537，成交约 $120 万；但同期价格回撤约 30%，流动性降到约 $2.7万—$2.9 万，成交额是流动性的四十多倍。筹码暂时分散、主池锁定接近 100%，可机器人比例未知，项目与 Lil BUB 原 IP 也没有可核验的官方关系。
合约：4FaSuBUp15t9Qiar9MdpaspkZJU5RK6A3QLnybNCpump
https://dexscreener.com/solana/J1GuZspgz3kxJqgngTGsR5QyJioSLAoZnApFd2yvtVsR
接下来我只验证三件事：HBULL 大额地址能否证明是受约束金库；回购和奖励流水能否连续对上；BUB 在热度降温后，持币和流动性能否留下来。大额地址向池内集中转入、HBULL 主池锁定继续明显下降，或 BUB 流动性继续快速流失，都会让我停止观察。
高风险研究记录，不是买卖建议。On July 26, $SHIB emerged in an independent super rally without any fundamental improvements, project announcements, or ecosystem updates. The intraday peak surged 36%, with the price hitting $0.0000057, and the market capitalization surged by $1 billion in a single day, pushing the total market cap past $3.4 billion. 1. The Real Core of This Round of Rallies — Korean Kimchi Funds Dominate the Market This rally is not a consensus among all online funds but rather concentrated speculation in a single region: South Korea's leading exchange Upbit's $SHIB/KRW trading pair recorded a single-day trading volume of $62 million, accounting for over 10% of global trading volume. Moreover, the Korean session continues to perform at a slight premium over the mainstream US dollar market, which proves that this round of $SHIB's surge was entirely driven unilaterally by Korean retail funds. 2. Severe sector fragmentation, capital tightly clusters $SHIB This round of meme coin rally is not a broad rally but an extreme structural rally: - $DOGE Only rose 6% during the same period - Other dog-type imitation stocks generally rose less than 10% Capital is highly concentrated and solely focused on $SHIB, with very weak follow-up within the sector and no overall sector resonance support. 3. Contract liquidation data clarification: Short closing is not the driving force behind the rally. During this rally, a total of 2,300 users liquidated $SHIB positions across the network, with a total liquidation amount of $6 million. Of this, short positions were liquidated about $5 million. Key Core Conclusion: Short liquidation is merely a passive result after price increases, and is by no means the driving force behind this rally📊 $BCH Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $96.06
· 4 hours: $293.63
· 12 hours: $48,400
· 24 hours: $58,300
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $96.06 $0 100%
4h $189.26 $104.37 64.5%
12h $32,000 $16,300 66.1%
24h $36,200 $22,100 62.1%
Duokong interpretation
Forced liquidations dominated all periods (24-hour bulls accounted for 62.1%), indicating a sustained one-sided downward trend. 1-12 hour long positions account for 64.5%~100%, with almost no resistance on the bears; Although there was a 24-hour short liquidation at $22,100 (accounting for 37.9%), bulls still dominated. Ultimate winner: Bears—The price shows a continuous one-sided downward trend, while the bulls have cleared out consecutive stop-losses.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.16% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.50% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 83.0% of 24 hours
Extreme liquidations are concentrated in the 12-hour cycle (over 80%), indicating that the main downward wave has erupted within 12 hours; The total 24-hour volume is 1.20 times that of the 12-hour period, and in the following 12 hours, the bullish continues, but its intensity weakens. Currently, the market is at the end of a bear-led sustained decline, with the bullish forces basically cleared out. In the short term, we need to wait for signals of shrinking volume.
A one-sentence explanation
$BCH 24-hour long liquidations at $36,200, accounting for 62% of total volume; 12-hour concentrated breakout mainly triggered a decline, with bears winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 欧洲加密圈正在经历一场无声的洗牌！
先别盯着K线了，看个更深远的变化。
欧洲那边，MiCA法规全面落地，英国FCA也快把框架敲定了。
但关键已经不是拿牌照的事。
真正的门槛是合规成本，这直接决定了谁能活下去。
直接说我的判断：
加密原生小企业的生存空间在被挤压，而传统银行，反而借着现成的合规底子，准备进场收割了。
英国更狠，不搞独立加密制度，直接把加密活动纳入传统金融监管，标准跟投行对齐。
这意味着，以前那种野蛮生长的路子，在欧洲基本走不通了。
整理几个普通人能拿走的点：
1. 如果你是从业者，别只满足于拿到牌照，赶紧评估长期合规成本，这比牌照本身更要命。
2. 对于想突围的加密公司，主动去找有合规基础设施的传统金融机构谈合作，甚至接受并购，可能是条明路。
3. 作为投资者，可以留意那些已经具备合规优势，或者能低成本融入传统金融体系的加密资产和相关标的。
当然，风险边界得说清楚。
这波并购潮的规模和速度，还得看市场行情和监管执行的具体力度。
而且监管太严也可能把创新逼到别的区域去，对欧洲自己反而是种长期损失。
本文只是趋势分析，不构成任何投资建议，市场变化永远比预想快。
免责声明：仅为信息整理与逻辑复盘，不构成任何投资建议。市场有风险，请自行研究。
$BTC$ETH$BNB#欧洲监管$PEPE Breaking through 0.00000304 was mainly driven by SHIB overflow and a decrease in exchange withdrawal stock, but the RSI6 reached 82.32, indicating that short-term liquidity has been overdrawn, making chasing highs very cost-effective.
The decline in exchange stock combined with the surge in Upbit trading volume formed the core buying interest. Compared to the long-term narrative of the second-half roadmap, the direct pull of SHIB sector capital spillover on spot liquidity is more obvious.
If spot buying remains strong and holds above the 0.00000304 to 0.00000305 resistance zone, the short-term liquidity push target will point to the 0.0000032 to 0.0000033 range. The scenario is effective if the 0.00000300 level is pushed back without breaking below and Upbit overflow funds show no sign of decline.
Once the 0.00000305 resistance level triggers intense selling pressure, profit-taking will push the price back to the first support band between 0.0000027 and 0.0000028. If it breaks further below the 0.0000025 to 0.0000024 support line, the 35% gains accumulated from the July 10 low of 0.0000022 will trigger a chain liquidation.
When the price smoothly breaks through 0.0000033 and the RSI6 falls back to the healthy range below 70, the short-term overbought correction prediction is declared invalid.
In the next 24 hours, focus on changes in Upbit's trading volume and the capital support at the 0.0000027 support level.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, progress in negotiations on the opening of the strait #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零Changxin Technology will open tomorrow for its IPO, and overseas AI giants face a "major test" in their earnings reports.
Next week is the last trading week of the month, and the market is about to experience two major key market moments:
First, Changxin Technology, the top IPO of the year in the A-share market, officially debuted on the STAR Market, directly reshaping the domestic memory sector landscape;
Second, the global storage giants + US AI weights collectively disclosed their earnings reports, resonating in both domestic and international markets, directly finalizing the mid-term trends of the chip and technology sectors.
Insider funds have mostly been watching and gathering strength this week, with the market accelerating completely starting tomorrow.
▶️ Changxin's IPO revenue gradient
Changxin issue price at 8.66 yuan per share, with a fixed 500 shares per STAR Market contract, a participation capital of 4,330 yuan, and an initial market capitalization of 579.2 billion yuan.
Based on the multi-dimensional valuation model of brokers, below are the range aligned with institutional expectations, with different price increases corresponding to stock prices, total market capitalization, and single contract net profit gradients, and ranges aligned with institutional expectations:
✅ 100% increase | Market value 1.16 trillion yuan | Stock price 17.32 yuan | Net profit of 4,330 yuan per single sign
✅ Up 200% | Market value 1.74 trillion | Stock price 25.98 yuan | Net profit of 8,660 yuan per single contract
✅ Up 300% | Market cap 2.32 trillion yuan | Stock price 34.64 yuan | Net profit of 12,990 yuan per sign
✅ 400% increase | Market value 2.90 trillion yuan | Stock price 43.30 yuan | Net profit of 17,320 yuan per sign
✅ Up 500% | Market value 3.48 trillion yuan | Stock price 51.96 yuan | Net profit of 21,650 yuan per sign
✅ Up 600% | Market value 4.05 trillion yuan | Stock price 60.62 yuan | Net profit of 25,980 yuan per sign
Objectively speaking, considering conservative to ultra-optimistic valuations, the reasonable first-day fluctuation range is 70%-600%, corresponding to winning profits of 3,000-26,000 yuan. A rise of over 600% is purely market sentiment speculation, lacking fundamental support, and chasing the price with minimal cost-effectiveness.
▶️ The core logic of Changxin's valuation
There is significant market disagreement over Changxin's valuation, but the core logic is actually very clear. The initial market value of 579.2 billion yuan comes from genuine institutional inquiry pricing, providing a solid safety cushion rather than a sentiment-driven valuation.
The company's performance has surged this year, with a full annual profit forecast of 100 billion yuan. Compared to overseas storage giants, its current forward valuation is within a reasonable range. At the same time, as a rare domestic DRAM mass production target in A-shares, benefiting from expectations of domestic substitution and technological breakthroughs, it carries a valuation premium, with a reasonable valuation center of 1.5-2 trillion yuan.
A rational view of the market is needed. The storage industry has strong cyclical attributes, and current high performance relies on short-term AI dividends. Coupled with the company's ongoing technological gap with leading overseas firms, the high valuation driven by short-term sentiment creates pressure to absorb the gains, so blind chasing is not recommended.
▶️ A-share market forecast for tomorrow
Changxin's listing will directly affect the capital flow of the A-share technology sector. Tomorrow, the market will show obvious structural differentiation, with core changes concentrated in three points:
1. Capital Divergence: Large transactions in the secondary market will divert existing funds from tech tracks like AI hardware and semiconductor design. Without market growth, small tech stocks are likely to come under pressure.
2. Stock switching: With the establishment of leading storage manufacturing companies, funds will shift from marginal stocks like modules and controllers to Changxin's core leaders, clearly showing a trend of de-weak while keeping strong.
3. Industry Chain Benefits: The company's funds raised for capacity expansion and equipment procurement directly benefit upstream semiconductor equipment and materials supporting sectors, providing sustained catalysts.
▶️ Overseas Storage Financial Report Outlook
Next Wednesday, major overseas storage leaders will release their earnings reports in concentrated numbers, which will be key to verifying the current AI storage boom and will also influence the mid-term market outlook for A-share semiconductors:
▪️ SK Hynix (7.29): Predicts the industry shortage will continue into 2030, focusing on chip price increases as they take effect
▪️ Samsung (7.30): Early positive factors have been overwhelmed, focusing on HBM shipments and order guidance
▪️ Kioxia (7.31): Market value fluctuates sharply; earnings reports will verify the authenticity of industry prosperity
Institutions generally believe that the HBM capacity shortage will persist until 2027, and as long as the current financial data remains solid, the mid-term rally in the storage sector is likely to continue.
▶️ Reference for U.S. AI earnings sentiment
Next week, US AI tech giants will concentrate on earnings disclosures, and the market will show clear style divergence this year: heavy-asset semiconductors are strengthening, while tech companies that have made significant investments in AI are showing weakness, which can serve as a reference for the peripheral sentiment of the A-share tech sector.
The core suppression is that the market does not recognize the sustained capital investment of AI companies without returns; previously, Alphabet plunged due to excessive spending. This sentiment may slightly transmit to A-shares but will not change the independent market trend of domestic storage.
Overall, tomorrow it is advisable to focus on seizing the structural opportunity presented by Changxin's IPO and cautiously participate in secondary market chasing gains.
Next week, focus on tracking the performance of overseas storage earnings reports, avoid short-term sentiment fluctuations caused by US AI earnings, and pay attention to trading rhythm.Uni Short-term: All the good news has been exhausted, so early profit-taking is normal.
Voting on fee proposals (v4 protocol fees + Robinhood Chain scaling) ended on July 25, with extremely high support and entering queued mode, about to be executed. All new protocol fees will continue to flow into the existing UNI burn mechanism (TokenJar). Short-term traders treat "proposal approval" as event-driven and realize profits early, which is completely reasonable.
But from a long-term perspective, the significance of this matter goes far beyond "burning a bit more coins."
1. Significant increase in buyback/burn efforts
After the proposal passes, protocol fee coverage will be greatly expanded (v4 selected pools + Robinhood Chain v2/v3), and the burn pace will accelerate noticeably. Hayden himself has clearly stated that, based on current transaction volume, especially Robinhood Chain, the impact on UNI burn will be "substantial."
You can wait about a month for actual on-chain data to come out, then conduct a horizontal backtest against $HYPE's annual buyback ratio—the numbers will be more convincing.
2. Uniswap's innovation genes remain leading
v1/v2: Simplifying and popularizing AMM as the underlying standard for DeFi.
v3: Pioneered Hyundai CLAMM, allowing each LP to customize its price range within the same pool.
v4: Pioneered and centered on the Pool Lifecycle Hook, standardizing permissionless AMM extension architecture.
As the pioneer of DEXs, almost every major upgrade has redefined the industry's gameplay.
3. Default liquidity entry in reality
Currently, for most EVM chain launch platforms, Uniswap remains the preferred pool. v4's Hook gives launch platforms huge customization space (custom fees, dynamic logic, auction mechanisms, etc.). Of course, alpha launches on BSC are still dominated by Pancake, but Uniswap's position as a first-mover and standard remains solid in the overall landscape.
4. Scalability is far from the ceiling
New mechanisms like CCA auction issuance have already proven strong product expansion potential, though currently they are relatively restrained. This "capable but not overly aggressive" pace is actually more beneficial for long-term ecosystem health.
Previously, $UNI was criticized for being "unempowered," but now, through UNIfication + protocol fees, continuous burning, the value capture path has become clearer.
First-mover advantage + continuous product innovation + almost leading the evolution of on-chain DEXs allows for bolder possibilities—the true on-chain Nasdaq is not just empty talk.
Proposal Details:
vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals
What do you all think?
#新手必看: Everything you need is here
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Key Rules for Trading New OKX Listings
Avoid Buying the First 15-Minute Candle: Initial spikes are often driven by pre-listing token holders taking profit.
Wait for Base Formation: Let the price establish a 1H/4H support level before opening positions.
Use Strict Stop-Losses: Liquidity depth can be thin in early days, leading to wider slippage during market-wide moves.
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled #KoreaAIChipPush 📅 2026-07-26（周日）夜间盘面与宏观复盘
💾 一、长鑫存储：明日登陆科创板
长鑫存储（CXMT）将于周一上市，是亚洲今年最受关注的 IPO 之一。目前 HYPE 已上线 CXMT Pre-IPO 永续，存储板块的市场热度也在持续上升。
这次上市影响的不只是 A 股半导体板块，还可能带动全球存储产业链重新估值，重点关注：
Micron（MU）
SK Hynix
Samsung
SanDisk
如果长鑫存储上市首日表现明显超出预期，资金可能进一步向存储芯片及相关产业链扩散，这也是本周最值得观察的事件之一。
📈 二、美股与科技股：进入财报超级周
本周科技股财报将密集公布，重点包括：
Microsoft
Meta
Apple
Amazon
市场现在已经不再讨论“AI 有没有未来”，而是开始追问一个更现实的问题：
巨额 AI 资本开支什么时候能够转化为收入和利润？
Microsoft 和 Amazon 需要证明云业务与 AI 服务的变现能力；Meta 需要证明 AI 对广告效率的提升；Apple 则要回答 AI 能否真正推动新一轮硬件换机周期。
本周财报结果，很可能决定科技股和 AI 主线下一阶段的方向。
🪙 三、BTC与ETH：大事件前的等待模式
BTC、ETH 今日波动不大，属于典型的大事件前资金观望行情。
短期主要情景仍然取决于美联储：
如果美联储释放偏鸽信号，流动性预期改善，BTC、ETH 有望继续走强；
如果表态偏鹰，美债收益率和美元重新走高，则需要防范风险资产同步回调。
当前位置不适合因为周末的小幅波动频繁改变方向，更重要的是等待本周宏观事件给出确认。
🔥 四、HYPE：重点仍然是生态扩张
HYPE 今天的重点并不是价格，而是生态正在持续完善，并开始覆盖越来越多的传统资产和 Pre-IPO 标的。
这也是我长期关注 HYPE 的核心原因之一。
如果未来链上 DEX 能够继续争夺中心化交易所的市场份额，HYPE 依旧属于值得持续跟踪的第一梯队项目。
🟡 五、黄金与原油：暂时缺少新催化
黄金
周末市场休市，盘面没有明显变化。短期继续关注美元和美债收益率走势，本周美联储表态将是黄金最重要的方向变量。
原油
原油继续围绕地缘政治和供应风险交易，目前暂时没有出现特别新的催化，等待周一开盘后的资金反馈。
🗓️ 六、本周关键事件日历
⭐ 周一
长鑫存储上市
⭐ 周三
美联储利率决议
Microsoft 财报
Meta 财报
⭐ 周四
Apple 财报
Amazon 财报
美国 GDP 数据
⭐ 周五
美国 PCE 数据
中国 PMI 数据
💡 今日交易思考
真正的大行情，往往并不是从新闻公布的那一刻才开始。
在重要事件落地之前，资金通常已经提前调整仓位、布局方向。很多人还在关注 BTC 今天涨了还是跌了 0.5%，但真正决定未来一个月市场走势的，可能是：
美联储的政策态度
科技巨头的财报表现
AI CapEx 的实际回报
长鑫存储上市后的市场反馈
所以，与其纠结周末有没有波动，我更愿意把注意力放在一个问题上：
下一阶段，哪些资产会成为资金最愿意持续买入的方向？
市场已经进入超级周，耐心等待关键事件落地，再根据结果调整方向。
以上仅为个人市场观察，不构成任何投资建议。