Orbit Post Sitemap
While slacking off in the afternoon, I found SHIB's performance today quite impressive, rising 9.49% in one day. The latest price is $0.000005210. If you count from around 0.00000423, this rebound is already close to 20%.
However, I didn't chase it immediately. Instead, I checked the on-chain data and felt there were several noteworthy changes behind this rally.
First, the number of tokens on exchanges continues to decrease.
In the past 24 hours, over 11.3 billion SHIB flowed out of exchanges, with an overall net flow of about -145 billion SHIB, indicating a clear net outflow on-chain. Meanwhile, exchange reserves have dropped to 86.1 trillion, getting closer and closer to the psychological threshold often mentioned by the market.
My understanding is that the reduction in tradable and sellable tokens on exchanges will indeed provide some short-term support for supply, but tightening supply is only one factor affecting prices; it also depends on whether capital inflows continue to be made.
Another change is that the destruction speed is also being increased.
In the past 24 hours, the SHIB burn rate surged by 350%; In the past 7 days, a total of 44.23 million SHIB tokens were burned, a 32.63% increase compared to the previous week. These figures indicate that the community is still advancing the burn mechanism, which will help market sentiment.
There are also new catalysts on the news side.
With ongoing legislative advances related to Japanese crypto ETFs, SHIB has been included in Japan's JVCEA green list, which to some extent enhances its compliance market narrative. This is a positive signal for funds long-focused on the Japanese market.
However, I think we shouldn't just look at the positive news now.
From a technical perspective, SHIB is still trading below the 50-day, 100-day, and 200-day EMAs, indicating that the medium- to long-term trend has not truly reversed. Additionally, on-chain data shows that about 707 wallets control 94% of the supply, with whale holdings remaining highly concentrated.
Another point that's easy to overlook: although the amount of burned has increased significantly recently, compared to the circulating supply of about 589 trillion coins, the scale of this burn is still relatively limited. In the short term, it tends to improve market sentiment rather than completely change supply-demand relationships.
Next, I will focus on resistance in the 0.00000520–0.00000530 USD range.
If trading volume can effectively amplify and break through, the upper side can continue to watch the 0.000000550—0.00000600 USD area; If the rally is blocked, attention should still be paid to whether the 0.00000418–0.00000420 USD range can form the first support.
Overall, I prefer to see this rally as a technical recovery driven by tighter supply, increased burning, and sector synergy. Before a true trend reversal is achieved, I think more trading volume and sustained capital inflows are needed to confirm, so I won't change my trading rhythm just because of a single day's rise.
The above is just my personal observation based on market data and public data, and does not constitute any investment advice. When trading, you should manage your positions according to your own risk tolerance.
$BTC $ETH $SHIB
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard
#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard 闺蜜说她男朋友在大厂上班炒币亏了一套房
我听完第一反应不是同情
是打开跌幅榜
想确认今天到底谁在流血
结果呢
大盘并没在崩
BTC 64513
二十四小时反而是涨的
百分之零点七一
ETH更亮一点
到了1885附近
涨约百分之一点五
SOL 74.95
也有百分之一点四左右
所以这不是「全面杀跌日」
是结构分化日
跟得上缓和与资金叙事的
先抬头
跟不上的
继续阴跌给人添堵
周五ETF那档还记着约二点二五亿美金净流出
账本偏冷
可周末现货偏暖
这种错位最容易骗人
你会以为反转确认了
其实只是空头挤一点
多头也没敢把杠杆拉满
资金费率几乎贴零
更像大家都不想过夜赌方向
跌幅榜上的名字
多半是叙事退潮和流动性抽走
不是大饼带头砸穿
我闺蜜那句「亏了一套房」
放在这种结构里特别真
赚的时候觉得自己懂轮动
亏的时候才发现
自己买的是弹性
不是Beta
所以我的判断是
今天别用「跌幅榜情绪」去定性整个市场
先分清是指数问题还是个币问题
指数还在六万四千附近磨
个币杀的是拥挤交易
我只考虑把弱的换成更干净的现货
不在分化市里用高杠杆去赌V反
接下来瞄一眼最近有什么热点，随便唠几句：
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
存储双雄拿AI大单的消息还在广场转，风险偏好先在股权叙事里加温，再慢半拍渗到加密风险资产。大饼小涨更像情绪外溢，不是芯片订单直接兑换成买盘。我会把这条当风险偏好背景音，不拿个币去映射每一条供应链新闻。
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信，获行业集体背书
开源倡议听着热血，盘面上AI叙事已经反复定价过几轮，短线更敏感的是算力资本开支能不能兑现。加密这边AI标签币弹性大、逻辑薄，适合当情绪温度计，不适合当主仓。我更愿意看算力与稳定币支付有没有真实需求，而不是又追一波口号。
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元
四千七百亿的月成交听起来吓人，说明代币化资产的交易层真有人在用，不只是路演PPT。可量能暴增不等于你钱包里的杂币会跟涨，结构化产品吃的是费率与基差。我会把RWA当中期主线跟踪，短线仍以大饼位置和杠杆拥挤度为先。
$BTC $ETH #跌幅解读 #结构分化My dad asked me what DeFi is, and I said, don't worry about it, I'll help you buy it
My dad came to ask again tonight
I just looked at the board and could only give a dry laugh
Traditional markets are closed on Sundays
But Da Bing was bouncing around on his own
I quickly glanced at the message
The easing winds from the US and Iran have risen again
The previous two crude oils clearly fell back
Negotiations for the opening of the strait have also made progress
Then guess what
BTC 64513
In 24 hours, it rose by 0.71%.
The missile narrative is a bit looser
Oil prices fell first
The currency is first green
US stocks will have to wait until Monday to open and verify their results
This collaboration is a bit twisted
In the past, whenever I heard about tensions in the Middle East,
Everyone was just waiting to smash the price and put on a show
Now, pricing is more like the Xiansong product channel
Risk assets will find a way out over the weekend
On Friday, the ETF still saw a net outflow of about $225 million
The cumulative net inflow was about 81.2 billion yuan
Institutional ledgers are not so romantic
But the spot just doesn't go along with the panic script
The open interest in BTC contracts on OKX is about 31,700 units
This amounts to around 2 billion US dollars
The funding rate is close to zero
The weekend volume is also not exaggerated
It looks more like a sideways trading loss
It's not a trend ignite
So my judgment is
Before Monday's open, don't formulate 'oil drop = US stocks must rally = crypto must surge.'
Easing only reduces tail risk premiums
Whether it's real or not depends on whether US stock futures and crude oil are confirmed together
I'd rather see the reaction with the in-stock stock
Don't use weekend sentiment to leverage it
Looking through today's plate, there are a few interesting points:
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
Earnings season is still reflecting on the two reports from Google and TeslaThe stock price has dropped from $200 to $110, completely shattering the logic of "scarcity." The first batch of 20% employee stock ownership unlocked at the end of July is just the beginning. By August 6, about 910 million shares are expected to be tradable, while the previously tradable shares accounted for only about 4% of total share capital—the supply is about to double or even more.
For a large number of employees with very low exercise costs, the unrealized profit on paper is still substantial even at $110. Mortgages, education, asset allocation—monetization is a rigid demand. Not to mention, short positions now account for about 30% of the circulating shares, so short selling funds are positioning in advance, waiting to receive these "blood-soaked chips."
But risk often breeds opportunity. If the stock price accelerates its decline after the early August earnings report, or if a sharp drop leads to a clear volume reduction and bottoming pattern, it is highly likely that panic trading and unlocking selling pressure are being concentrated and released. At that time, low-price chips may appear. I will wait for that moment. ⚠️During the 2024-2025 rally, the main rally for altcoins generally didn't last more than three months, followed by a general pullback of over 80%. During this short window, only a few people took profits in time, while most were trapped. Essentially, they treated the hype story as a long-term value belief.
The lifespan of counterfeit markets is extremely short, caused by multiple factors combined:
First, altcoin buying funds are limited to the existing market within the circle, with no external incremental funds entering the market; Second, it represents the end of market rotation, with most funds already diverted to mainstream coins; Combined with project token unlocks and project team dumping, selling pressure is continuous; This round of ETFs also diverted mainstream coin funds, and the 'dog' sector has taken up liquidity from the market stock.
Looking ahead, I am more optimistic about the DeFi sector, whose market cycle will also last about three months. #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard 🚀 RWA perpetual monthly trading volume reaches 470 billion, surging 450% in just half a year!
This is not a celebration at the end of a bull market, but a signal for the start of a new track.
Tokenized stocks, commodities, and even SpaceX are being "perpetuated" on-chain.
In June, just OKX and the other three platforms captured over 80% of the market share, while SpaceX made $66 billion in a single month.
🧠 My three observations:
❶ Not speculative repackaging, but capital seeking "on-chain alphas"
The low volatility of traditional assets + the high leverage of perpetual contracts naturally makes them suitable for market makers and event-driven traders. 66 billion is not something retail investors can accumulate; institutions are testing the waters.
❷ Tokenized stocks surged 7 times—who's next?
I believe it is the government bond income rights — on-chain interest-bearing assets + RWA compliance, which is a trillion-yuan blue ocean. Pre-IPO liquidity is poor, foreign exchange regulatory barriers are high, and government bonds are most likely to burst first.
❸ You haven't made a deal yet? What are you waiting for?
Liquidity and other factors? Regulation? and other user-friendly UIs?
—These are improving rapidly, while the first movers are already taking the premium.
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 存储股的高景气与高波动：美光、闪迪、SK海力士谁更值得关注？
AI 算力扩张正在改变存储行业的竞争格局。过去，投资者把内存和闪存视为周期性较强的基础元件，价格上涨往往意味着供需失衡，价格下跌则意味着库存积压。进入 AI 时代后，HBM、高容量服务器 DRAM 和企业级 SSD 开始成为数据中心的核心设备，存储厂商也因此获得了新的增长空间。
但存储股近期的走势提醒投资者，行业基本面向好，并不代表股价可以持续上涨。7 月 24 日，美光单日下跌约 7%，闪迪下跌约 11%，SK 海力士韩国本土股票下跌约 8%。此前三家公司都经历了大幅上涨，近期回调更像是获利回吐和估值重估，而不是需求突然消失。
AI 仍在扩大存储需求
AI 服务器需要大量 HBM 来提高 GPU 的数据传输效率，也需要 DRAM 保存运行中的数据。随着模型规模扩大，数据中心还要部署更多 SSD，用于保存训练数据、模型文件、缓存和推理结果。
市场研究机构 Gartner 预计，2026 年 DRAM 价格可能上涨 125%，NAND Flash 价格可能上涨 234%，存储价格压力或许延续到 2027 年以后。Gartner 行业预测
TrendForce 对 2026 年第二季度的判断也偏强，预计传统 DRAM 合约价格环比上涨 58%至63%，NAND Flash 价格上涨 70%至75%。存储厂商把更多产能转向 HBM、服务器内存和企业级 SSD，普通 PC 和手机使用的存储产品因此面临供给收缩。TrendForce 价格预测$MU $SKHYNIX $SNDK
这组数据说明行业仍处于强周期，但也带来一个问题：高价格能持续多久？
美光：产品最完整，预期也最高
美光同时经营 DRAM、HBM、NAND 和企业级 SSD。它可以从 AI 服务器内存需求中获益，也能从数据中心扩大存储容量中获得收入。
美光 2026 财年第三季度收入达到 414.6 亿美元，创下公司纪录。公司还给出了更强的第四季度展望，并表示 HBM4 已经进入高量出货阶段，HBM4E 正在开发，预计 2027 年实现量产。美光 2026 财年第三季度财报
美光的另一项优势来自美国本土制造布局。公司计划扩大美国 DRAM 产能，这不仅有助于降低供应链风险，也可能获得政策支持和大型客户的长期订单。
不过，美光股价已经充分反映了行业复苏和 AI 需求增长。未来市场不会只看收入是否增长，还会看利润率能否维持、资本开支是否失控，以及新增产能何时投产。如果公司业绩只是符合预期，股价仍可能承受压力。
闪迪：押注 NAND 和企业级 SSD
闪迪的业务重点是 NAND Flash 和 SSD。与美光、SK 海力士相比，闪迪对 HBM 的直接参与较少，但它对 NAND 价格和企业级 SSD 需求更加敏感。
闪迪 2026 财年第三季度收入达到 59.5 亿美元，环比增长 97%，其中数据中心业务增长 233%。公司预计第四季度收入为 77.5 亿至 82.5 亿美元。闪迪 2026 财年第三季度财报
AI 数据中心需要的不只是 GPU 和 HBM。模型训练产生的数据集需要长期保存，推理服务需要频繁读取模型文件，缓存系统也需要更大的 SSD 容量。只要数据中心继续扩张，企业级 SSD 就有较强的增长空间。
闪迪的特点是盈利弹性大。NAND 价格上涨时，公司利润可能快速增长；但当供需关系发生变化，利润也可能快速回落。它更像一只高波动的存储价格标的，适合看好 NAND 周期、同时能够承受较大回撤的投资者。
SK 海力士：HBM 竞争力最突出
SK 海力士目前最强的业务仍然是 HBM。公司 2026 年第一季度收入达到 52.58 万亿韩元，营业利润达到 37.61 万亿韩元，营业利润率达到 72%，创下历史新高。SK 海力士 2026 年第一季度财报
SK 海力士在 HBM 产品、客户关系和量产经验方面具有优势。随着 AI 应用从模型训练扩展到实时推理，公司的增长也开始从 HBM 延伸到服务器 DRAM、eSSD 和其他高容量存储产品。
但 HBM 的竞争正在加剧。美光和三星都在提高产能和良率，客户也可能通过引入更多供应商来降低采购风险。SK 海力士当前的高利润率建立在技术领先和供给紧张之上。如果竞争对手缩小差距，或者 HBM 价格开始下降，公司的估值可能受到双重压力。我妈的同事退休金全买了比特币，现在天天请我们吃饭
上周末家庭聚餐的时候她一直在说
「年轻人就要胆子大」
但我想说的是这个位置其实很多人的胆量已经被磨没了
资金费率显示BTC和ETH仍然处于看跌区间
什么意思呢
就是做多的人要付钱给做空的人
说明市场上大部分人还是偏空的
但奇怪的是BTC这周不但没跌反而涨了0.6%
然后你猜怎么着
这种「看跌但不跌」的行情其实是最考验人的
如果你的分析告诉你应该看多
但市场情绪一直在说看空
你会信哪个
我自己的经验是
跟着数据走不要跟着情绪走
5个买入信号对0个卖出信号
这个数据不会骗人
虽然ETF在流出225M
但BTC价格不跌
说明OTC和现货买盘在接盘
这是机构在悄悄吸筹的信号
另外还有一个心理博弈的点
BitMart事件周末发酵了
CEO说自己也是被通知要停运的
MSX创始人又想收购
这种混乱反而说明有些人在低位捡便宜
敢在恐慌时接盘的人往往是大赢家
所以我的判断是
这个位置不要在情绪上被别人带着走
资金费率看跌≠价格会跌
有时候大家都看跌的时候反而是最好的建仓窗口
等所有人都看涨了特朗普叫停空袭，油价暴跌，$BTC 反而涨了
连续13天的空袭，说停就停了。
特朗普24日直接下令当天不再对伊朗发动新打击。消息一出，WTI原油暗盘大跌近4%，布伦特跌超3%。BTC反而从63800附近拉到64460左右。
逻辑通了——油价跌→通胀预期降温→风险资产喘口气。
但别高兴太早。特朗普原话：“如果我们不能从伊朗得到我们想要的100%，我们绝对会考虑恢复全面战争。”而且霍尔木兹海峡还没重新开放。
短线可以博弈反弹，但设好止损。别把战术暂停当成战略和平。
评论区聊聊，你们觉得这波反弹能持续吗？还是说只是暴风雨前的宁静？ Tech giants collectively pull back: Why did these stocks all fall today?
Looking at the market today, a glaring red color was a stark display—Micron Technology (MU) plunged over 7%, Intel (INTC) plunged 12%, SanDisk (SNDK) fell nearly 11%, Tesla (TSLA) also fell 2.2%, and even Nvidia (NVDA) couldn't stay unscathed, slipping nearly 1%. Both the semiconductor and new energy vehicle sectors have cooled off. In my view, this adjustment is an inevitable profit-taking + sector rotation. Since the beginning of this year, AI concept stocks have surged dramatically, with chip giants like Nvidia already exhausting some of their optimistic expectations. Recently, the market has begun to worry that AI capital expenditure growth may slow down, with Micron and Intel, as representatives of memory and traditional chips, naturally bearing the brunt. Intel's biggest drop may reflect not only industry pressure but also ongoing market doubts about its competitiveness and transformation progress. Tesla, on the other hand, was dragged down by overall weakness in its new energy vehicle sector, with delivery data and Robotaxi narratives temporarily struggling to boost confidence. Looking deeper, this is the normal breath of a high-valuation sector. Tech stocks have risen so fiercely that capital needs a breather, and shifting to other undervalued sectors is also reasonable. On the macro front, interest rate expectations, inflation data, or geopolitical factors may also exacerbate the decline in short-term risk appetite. Personal view: Short-term pullbacks shouldn't be overly pessimistic, especially for NVIDIA, whose fundamentals remain strong and long-term AI demand remains. What truly needs to be watched out are Intel and some follower stocks; if there is no substantial improvement, the correction could be even deeper. But for high-quality stocks, this is often a "shakeout" rather than a "trend reversal."Changxin hasn't officially opened yet, but long and short positions on X are already fighting. Some are preparing to go all-in on 300,000 yuan in flash loans, while public addresses have held over 13 million USD in short positions; In the Chinese-speaking region, discussions about how much profit can be made from winning the lottery, while in the English-speaking region, the pre-market contract for Hyperliquid has already priced Changxin's valuation close to 3 trillion yuan. I compiled 31 tweets in both Chinese and English, checking issuance data, financial performance, industry news, pre-market prices, and market rumors one by one. I'm not going to guess a simple answer to a rise or fall first. What really needs to be answered is: How much is Changxin really worth? How was the 3 trillion yuan expectation formed? Which high-traffic news can be trusted? After the market opens, which data should we keep an eye on? 1. 31 tweets, but the most discussed topic isn't Changxin's technology. These 31 tweets are not a market-wide poll. I filter content with high pre-IPO views or those that represent a certain type of viewpoint. Among them, 20 tweets were in Chinese, and 11 were in English or other languages; 22 views exceeded 50,000, 14 views exceeded 100,000, and 9 exceeded 200,000. Categorizing them, the results are straightforward: - 10 discusses trading plans and retail sentiment; - 9 discusses valuation and pre-market prices; - 7 discussing companies and industries; - 5 are rumors or commercial promotions. Nearly two-thirds of the content discusses price, position, and "how much can be made?" What the company truly achieves is not the traffic center. The most viewed account is the English account [@zephyr_z9]. The problem is, the latter ones🛰 金十雷达 | 21:49
主题：霍尔木兹
据金十快讯，【沙特媒体：伊朗方面称并未退出谈判，愿在日内瓦多地与美国继续谈判】金十数据7月26日讯，综合阿拉伯卫星电视台与沙特媒体哈达斯报道，伊朗已告知巴基斯坦官员，伊朗并未退出谈判，而是暂时中止了。伊朗重申了在停滞阶段恢复谈判的必要性、表示拒绝在霍尔木兹海峡开辟新航道。此外，伊朗已向巴基斯坦确认，愿意在日内瓦、卡塔尔多哈或伊斯兰堡继续（与美国）进行谈判；并要求恢复关于…
观察视角：这类消息先看是否影响油价、美元或美股风险偏好，再观察BTC/ETH跟随强弱。
验证点：若后续没有价格、成交量或避险资产确认，就按背景变量处理，不把标题当交易信号。
仅作市场观察，不构成投资建议。$BASED — RECOVERY STRUCTURE FORMING
BASED is trading near $0.08386 after a moderate intraday pullback. The present price area could become a short-term recovery zone if buyers defend support and begin producing stronger volume.
TRADE SETUP
EP: $0.0831 – $0.0843
TP1: $0.0864
TP2: $0.0889
TP3: $0.0922
SL: $0.0804
Holding above the entry range could allow BASED to challenge TP1. A confirmed breakout above $0.0864 may attract additional momentum and open the way toward $0.0889 and $DOGE $BASED .On July 26th, before dawn at five o'clock, the light had not yet fully penetrated the window,
the numbers on the screen hovered between 64590.5 and 63806.4, as if caught by the sticky summer night of this city, moving up and down by less than one percent. The 24-hour trading volume was about 168 million USDT, neither too big nor too small, just enough for the candlestick chart to draw a few lazy shadows. No one shouted in surprise, nor did anyone panic. In this nearly frozen market, a statistic quietly refreshed: ten listed companies collectively hold over one million bitcoins.
An integer milestone arrived silently. Strategy still sits at the top — 843,775 coins, worth about $58 billion at current prices. This number itself carries a distant echo, reminiscent of the market stir when MicroStrategy first bought Bitcoin in the summer of 2020. In the years since, from El Salvador to pension funds, from spot ETF approvals to now SpaceX quietly holding over 18,000 coins and having listed on Nasdaq just over a month ago. The institutional narrative of Bitcoin has grown so thick that it’s almost hard to remember it was once just a whitepaper attachment in a cypherpunk mailing list.
But on the other side of the screen, the stock price curves tell a completely different story. Since 2026, Riot Platforms rose 73%, Cleanspark 39%, Mara Holdings 31%; meanwhile, Strategy fell 40%, Metaplanet dropped 49%, Twenty One Capital down 48%, Coinbase Global down 31%. The largest holders saw the steepest declines; the miners’ gains seem to respond to some kind of revaluation of infrastructure value. The logic here is unclear and should not be simplified to a single cause. Perhaps it’s leverage structures, cash flow pressures, market sentiment rotation, or just a long and ordinary value reassessment in summer.
Fragmented news trickled in. Bitcoin ETF weekly trading volume has fallen to the lowest level since October 2024, while Ethereum ETF just ended five consecutive days of inflows, but weekly net inflows continue to extend — capital seems more willing to chase that delayed resilience. On the other side, an address went long with 38.55 million USDT, held for eighteen hours, and finally closed at a 1% stop-loss, losing $368,000, clean and neat like a nap without dreams. No heroic heavy positions held, no dramatic short reversals, just a string of numbers automatically disappearing after hitting a threshold.
The entire market seems to have entered a subtle silent period. Bitcoin’s DeFi locked value rose slightly by 0.72% near $4.394 billion, like the water level of a lake slowly rising after the rainy season, with no sign of rushing currents. And that "one million" integer is itself just a statistical magic under a certain perspective — how many of these bitcoins held by companies are long-term chips in cold wallets, how many are underlying assets of derivatives, and how many might be sold off anytime due to earnings pressure, no one can really say.
The last such dull summer was 2023, and before that 2019. In every cycle, summer always feels especially long. The list of holders changes, holding costs change, relative stock strength changes. The only thing that’s not easy to change is the bitcoins themselves, quietly lying on the chain, confirmed every ten minutes, occasionally stirring blockchain explorers due to a large transfer. They don’t speak, nor do they care whether they exist in a listed company’s treasury or an anonymous whale’s wallet.
When the heat finally fades and autumn volatility returns to the market, this holding list will probably show new names and new numbers again. Any structure that seems unshakable now is only temporary in the face of time. For those watching the screen, the only thing to remember is: the story is not over, the positions in hand are not settled, and history gives no guarantees.Trump's $1.4 billion in crypto revenue is killing the CLARITY Act
If the bill fails, the culprit is Chuanzi
The CLARITY Act is very likely to miss the August recess.
It's not a technical issue, not a vote count issue—it's Trump's own $1.4 billion in crypto revenue stuck there.
Bloomberg reported today: Trump made about $1.4 billion from meme coins and token businesses, which have now become the biggest obstacle to the bill's passage. The Democrats are demanding stricter moral clauses—the president cannot issue coins while legislating under his own administration's supervision.
The Republicans have only 53 seats in the Senate, and to surpass 60 votes, they need to bring in at least seven Democrats. But the Democrats are now clinging to Trump's crypto income, and both sides are at a stalemate.
The probability of passing on Polymarket has dropped from 74% in May to only about 33%. The market is voting with money.
The irony is—the TRUMP coin issued by Trump himself has now become a stumbling block for him to push through crypto legislation. The coins you issued blocked your own bill.
This drama still needs to be watched. But one thing is certain: the bill is very unlikely to pass before the August recess.
Let's talk in the comments: do you think Trump will sell his coins for the bill, or would he rather pass the bill than keep it?
$BTC $ETH 7月26日｜BTC数据晚报
BTC行情
BTC报 64,450美元附近，日内最高约 64,566美元、最低约 64,028美元，24小时上涨约 0.8%。价格继续围绕64,000—65,000美元震荡，尚未摆脱近期整理区间。
ETF资金
7月24日，美国现货BTC ETF合计净流出约 2.401亿美元，连续第二个交易日净流出；7月23日至24日累计净流出约 4.652亿美元。
此前连续7个交易日的资金回流已经中断，机构资金短期由连续流入转为连续撤出。
链上筹码（地址口径）
按7月25日至26日连续快照计算：
10 BTC以下：净减少约 65 BTC，最新总持仓约 347.22万 BTC
10—100 BTC：净增加约 182 BTC，最新总持仓约 423.24万 BTC
100 BTC以上：净增加约 108 BTC，最新总持仓约 1,235.42万 BTC
100 BTC以上内部变化：
100—1,000 BTC：净减少约 1,904 BTC
1,000—10,000 BTC：净增加约 1,878 BTC
10,000—100,000 BTC：净增加约 134 BTC
100,000 BTC以上：基本不变
100 BTC以上总持仓仅增加108 BTC，但内部迁移明显，主要表现为100—1,000 BTC档减少，1,000 BTC以上档位增加。
交易所BTC
最新公开快照显示，全交易所BTC余额约 270.32万枚，净流量约为 净流出3,075 BTC。
交易所余额仍处于净流出状态，与ETF连续两日净流出形成分化：链上可售筹码减少，但传统资金渠道短期转弱。
合约数据
BTC合约未平仓量约 485.3亿美元，24小时合约成交约 196.96亿美元，现货成交约 11.24亿美元，BTC合约爆仓约 636.6万美元。
未平仓量仍处于较高水平，但周末成交和爆仓规模均不大，市场暂时没有出现明显的集中去杠杆。
今日重要消息
下周美联储、日本央行和英国央行将陆续公布利率决定。与此同时，中东局势推动油价升至每桶100美元附近，能源价格重新推高通胀预期，市场开始增加对进一步加息的押注。高油价与高利率预期仍是BTC近期最重要的外部压力。
BitMart宣布结束九年运营，8月26日停止全部交易，2027年1月31日正式关闭；这是继BitMEX之后，一周内第二家交易平台宣布退出。BitMart此前报告的24小时成交约16亿美元，连续出现交易所关闭，可能继续影响市场对中小平台的信任和资金集中趋势。
俄罗斯最大银行Sberbank计划在12月前建立加密交易及托管基础设施。俄罗斯新的加密交易、托管和结算规则将于9月生效，说明大型传统银行继续进入受监管的加密资产服务领域，但短期对BTC资金面的直接影响有限。
接下来主要看
BTC能否重新站稳65,000美元，并突破近期66,000美元附近压力。
ETF周一开盘后能否恢复净流入，还是连续流出进一步扩大。
交易所BTC是否继续净流出，同时100—1,000 BTC地址能否停止减少。
油价若继续维持在100美元附近，并推动美债收益率上升，BTC的宏观压力仍难明显缓解。
$BTC #星球日报 Bitcoin liquidity concentration: The altcoin season has not yet arrived; funds are circulating among a few coins
Has the current market formed a sustainable bullish structure, or is it driven solely by local leverage?
Core Fact: The original post clearly stated that the current market is not in an upward trend across the market, but rather liquidity circulating among limited coins. Funds are concentrated in a few tokens such as BTC, JELLYJELLY, OPG, SLX, LAB, BSB, ALLO, and CHIP, while a large number of altcoins like BEAT, EDGE, COAI, TRUMP, and RAVE are losing momentum. ETH, SOL, TAO, WLD, HYPE, DOGE, and ZEC are regarded as structural pillars, corresponding respectively to institutional capital, high beta risk appetite, AI narrative, risk appetite indicators, and retail investor rally pursuit.
Market structure changes: The core contradiction in current pricing is that BTC maintains liquidity anchoring at high levels, but the altcoins as a whole have not formed a synchronized rise. This has led to divergence in funding rates: BTC perpetual contract funding rates remain positive, but most altcoins have funding rates close to zero or even turned negative, indicating that leverage is more concentrated on BTC, with little sustained long position accumulation on the altcoin side. On the basis side, the BTC futures premium structure (Contango) still exists, but the margin has narrowed, suggesting the market is becoming more conservative in its outlook for forward gains.
Pricing transmission path: If BTC continues to consolidate sideways at the current level, it will be difficult for funds to spread outward to altcoins, because once liquidity is absorbed by BTC, altcoins will need to rely on lower valuations or stronger narratives to attract incremental capital. Conversely, if BTC experiences a significant pullback, it could trigger a bullish stamp, leading to concentrated leveraged liquidations and dragging down mainstream coins like ETH and SOL, resulting in a systemic correction. Among altcoins, highly liquid assets like JELLYJELLY and OPG may remain relatively strong during BTC consolidation, but stalled coins like BEAT and EDGE are likely to continue falling if they fail to receive new capital injections.
Biased bullish path and conditions: If the BTC funding rate remains positive and the basis widens again, it indicates that leveraged long positions continue to increase positions, and the market may be entering a localized trend continuation. At this point, it is important to observe whether JELLYJELLY, OPG, and others are experiencing sustained rallies after increased trading volume, and whether the stagnant coins are bottoming out with increased volume and stabilizing the decline. Bearish path and conditions: If BTC's funding rate quickly turns negative or the basis narrows below parity, it suggests that bull confidence is breaking down and may trigger chain liquidations. At the same time, be wary of the accelerated decline of stagnant coins, which could lead to a collapse in overall risk appetite on the counterfeit side.
Risk warning: The current market structure heavily relies on BTC liquidity anchorage. If BTC loses key support levels, it could trigger market-wide deleveraging. If stagnant coins continue to shrink in volume, it will be difficult to form an effective rebound.
$BTC $ETH $SOL $HYPE $DOGE #流动性集中 #杠杆结构 #山寨币分化📊 $LIT 爆仓速览
爆仓规模
· 1小时：$50.73
· 4小时：$2,484.51
· 12小时：$5,236.94
· 24小时：$2.76万
多空分布
周期 多头爆仓 空头爆仓 多头占比
1h $0 $50.73 0%
4h $2,428.02 $56.50 97.7%
12h $5,022.43 $214.50 95.9%
24h $1.36万 $1.40万 49.3%
多空解读
1小时空头爆仓$50.73、多头为0，规模极小；4小时和12小时多头爆仓持续碾压空头（占比95.9%~97.7%），价格持续下跌；但24小时空头爆仓$1.40万以微弱优势反超（占50.7%），方向在12-24小时间发生逆转，转为逼空上涨行情。最终胜出方：多头——呈现“前段杀多→尾盘逼空逆转”格局。
时间分布
· 1小时占24小时的 0.18%
· 4小时占24小时的 9.0%
· 12小时占24小时的 18.97%
爆仓分布后置明显：前12小时合计仅占18.97%，而24小时总量是12小时的5.27倍，说明逼空行情在12-24小时间猛烈爆发（后12小时爆仓约$2.24万，占全天的81.0%）。当前处于逼空行情爆发阶段，空头尾盘遭集中清算，需关注持续性。
一句话解读
$LIT 24小时空头爆仓$1.40万占总量50.7%，方向逆转，多头最终胜出。
🔥 市场风向标 | 7月24日
今日三条热点，指向同一主题：AI的代价、监管的搁浅，以及地缘悬崖边的喘息。
📊 谷歌与特斯拉：AI盛宴的“账单”来了
两份财报揭开了AI叙事的残酷真相。
谷歌超预期但代价沉重：总营收1198亿美元，同比增长24%；谷歌云收入247.7亿美元，同比暴涨82%。然而，资本开支高达449亿美元，自由现金流首次转负至-59亿美元。盘后一度跌近5%。
特斯拉增收不增利：营收282.4亿美元，同比增长26%；但营业利润仅3.98亿美元，同比暴跌57%，运营利润率只剩1.4%。自由现金流两年多来首次转负。盘后跌超4%。
信号：谷歌的AI已在云业务中形成收入闭环；而特斯拉的Robotaxi和Optimus仍停留在“故事”阶段。市场正在惩罚只有概念、没有现金流的AI叙事。
📜 CLARITY法案搁浅：14亿美元的伦理困局
加密行业的监管希望正在消散。参议院共和党虽释放更新文本并加入道德条款，但7名民主党参议员集体否决。参议院多数党领袖图恩明确表示，法案大概率无法在8月7日休会前通过。
根本障碍：特朗普通过加密业务获得的约14亿美元收益成为最大阻力。民主党要求更严格的伦理条款，防止总统在其政府监管下继续从加密行业获利。
Polymarket预测市场显示，年内通过概率已从80%以上骤降至37%。错过8月窗口，拖入秋季选举，2026年通过可能性将大幅下降。
🚢 美军暂停空袭：地缘悬崖边的喘息
当地时间7月25日，特朗普下令美军当天不要对伊朗发动新空袭，结束了此前连续13天的每日打击行动。
暂停空袭前数小时，阿曼代表团已抵达德黑兰，就重启霍尔木兹海峡通航展开谈判，据称已取得进展。布伦特原油此前已突破100美元/桶，若谈判取得突破，油价有望回落。
信号：这是一次战术性暂停——为外交留空间，但美军恢复打击的预案仍在准备中。
💎 总结
三件事勾勒出当下市场的核心矛盾：AI的账单正在到来——谷歌和特斯拉用史上首次负现金流告诉市场，AI烧得比想象中更快；监管的窗口正在关闭——14亿美元的伦理困局让CLARITY法案年内通过希望渺茫；而地缘的喘息能持续多久，取决于阿曼斡旋的成败。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 ━━━ Night Review · 2026-07-26 ━━━
Shadow Shaman · Hunters on the chain
At the end of the day, logic remains.
🧭 Today's panorama
→ BTC $64,554 24h: +0.86% · ETH $1,888 24h: +1.71% · SOL $74.92
→ Today's Volatility: BTC 0.64K ($63,996-$64,637)
→ Trading volume: BTC $1.87B · Funding rate: BTC 0.001% / ETH 0.001%
📊 Structural changes
• OI: $2.035B (31,524 BTC), no significant increase or decrease throughout the day
• Funding rate: Both currencies have rates at <0.0011%, at an absolute low with no directional pressure
• BTC Premium: -0.055% (slight discount), bears slightly taking the initiative but showing no aggressive intent
🔥 Today's highlights
• #1 DCA (BSC) +9.11% — 24-hour gain over 4000%, but MCap only $184K, 42% of shares share the same source, showing obvious signs of manipulation
• #2 PONS (XLayer) +5.59% — MCap $54.6 million, one of the largest memes in the XLayer ecosystem, saw a slight rise today
• TRUMP2028 (Solana) +1.29% — 5,306 token-holding addresses, maintaining popularity but with modest gains
• BullPad (Solana) -27.47% — Previously surging memes experienced a deep pullback today, a typical "catch knife scene"
⚡ Smart money flows
• Smart money on Solana today mainly focused on SalaryCat (bought at $1,487), but has already sold 70%, showing a clear pattern of fast in and out of stock
• Justice For Sara Gilson (Sara) was chased by 10 smart money addresses, with 82% having sold out
• Overall, Smart Money was doing short-term harvesting in the Solana meme layer with a "grab a hand, then exit" strategy, with no intention to hold overnight
💡 Shadows recoil
BTC followed a standard contracting sideways movement today—$64K spent the day within 40 points. OI remains unchanged, rates are flat, and premiums are discounted but only slightly increased, indicating that both bulls and bears are controlling their positions. Guessing the direction at this position is no different from guessing a coin; the bulls haven't exerted momentum, and the bears haven't broken through.
Memes on the hot topic side are lively, but the DCA market with 42% of the same source is clearly a trap—whoever chases the most here is caught by a flying knife. Smart money showed no intention of staying overnight at the Solana meme level today; after the rally, it left. This sentiment transmitted to the main board signaled "no incremental funds entering the market."
Tonight, I chose to continue observing. If BTC can shrink above $64K and grind for another day, the structure would actually be healthier. No matter how sharp or down, I won't take it.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
📡 Shadow Shaman · Hunters on the chain
#暗影萨满🔥 从46干到142又摔回79！$OKB 这波不是回调，是把韭菜按在地上摩擦后递了根烟！
宝子们，7月这波$OKB 剧本，谁看了不迷糊？
📉 月初（7月初那根针）：还在46刀躺平装死。
🔥 然后OKX一把火：烧掉2.789亿枚$OKB ，总量永久焊死在2100万枚。
🚀 价格直接火箭发射：飙到142.88刀，一根193%的天量针，把空头全部送走。
💀 然后呢？：跌回79附近，磨了快三周。24h成交量缩到5000多万，散户全在问“是不是完了？”
#OKX.ai：一个人就是一家世界级公司
---
🧬 我跟你讲，这走势野得很，背后是三个硬逻辑在打架：
1. 供给端：OKX把比特币的稀缺剧本抄明白了
2100万总量锁死，智能合约把增发和人工销毁全封了。X Layer的Gas还在持续微量烧。这意味着什么？OKB不会再生了，只会越来越少。 交易所币搞固定总量，历史上你见过几个？
2. 需求端：押注全生态，不成功便成仁
OKX把OKT Chain砍了，全部押注X Layer（Polygon CDK的zkEVM）。OKB变成全生态唯一燃料+手续费折扣+Jumpstart门票。ICE（纽交所亲爹）还进来站了个位。这不是画饼，这是在搭台子。
3. 盘面：典型的暴涨后洗筹，等大哥发话
50日线79刀踩着，200日线88刀压着，RSI 56不冷不热。这就是被夹在中间反复摩擦，洗那些不坚定的人下车。
#OKX星球话题来啦
---
🗣️ 我的糙话版结论：
喊“归零”的，你醒醒。2100万总量+全生态Gas的交易所币，历史上没有先例。
喊“马上破200”的，你也别做梦。BTC不配合、X Layer日活没起来之前，79-82这个磨人区间还得待一阵。
现在是什么阶段？
恐惧贪婪指数曾经掉到23（极度恐惧），散户在割肉，大户在犹豫。典型的“涨了不敢追、跌了不敢接”的拧巴阶段。
OKB不是垃圾平台币了，是被OKX硬生生改造成“交易所版BTC”的怪胎。短期被大盘拖着走，中期看X Layer有没有真用户，长期就看2100万这个数字够不够讲故事。
👇 现在问题来了：
你觉得OKB这波是真跌透了准备二段发射，还是假摔完继续在78-82锯木头？
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到
走势图解析：
1. 长期趋势：前期从104.63高位完成深度熊市下跌，最大回撤超30%
2. 短期结构：70见底后开启修复反弹，现价站上全部短期均线，短期多头力量回暖
3. 压力支撑：上方第一压力85，下方支撑81-82（MA5/MA10均线）📊 JUST IN: Saylor Hints At More Bitcoin, But The Reality Is Sharper Now
"We're gonna need another color." Classic Saylor confidence, posted with a dashboard of Strategy's 843,775 BTC. But the numbers behind that swagger tell a harder story than the meme suggests.
📉 Where it stands:
Holdings: 843,775 BTC
Average cost: $75,653
Unrealized loss: about 14.8%, roughly $9.5 billion
Q2 digital asset loss: $8.32 billion, mostly unrealized
Here's what actually changed, and it matters. The "never sell" narrative is over. Strategy sold 3,588 BTC in early July for about $216 million, using the proceeds to fund preferred stock dividends and rebuild its dollar reserve. This followed a formal Bitcoin monetization program launched June 29 that lets the company sell up to $1.25 billion of BTC to cover obligations. A company built on the promise of relentless accumulation is now selling to pay its bills. That is a real shift, not a headline.
None of this means the long-term thesis is broken, and that's the honest takeaway. These losses are unrealized, the CFO says the reserve could cover net debt even if BTC fell 91%, and Strategy has still added coins across the cycle. The lesson worth borrowing is conviction and dollar-cost averaging over years, using capital you won't need tomorrow. The lesson to avoid is the leverage, the forced sales, and treating one confident tweet as a buy signal.
What to watch:
Whether Strategy keeps selling under the monetization program or resumes buying.
The health of its preferred stock and any pressure on MSTR shares, down 77% from the high.
A confident post from the biggest holder is not a catalyst. Respect the conviction, watch the balance sheet, because structure decides who survives a bear market.
Conviction that pays off, or a model meeting its limits?
Not financial advice. $BTC $ETH $SOL The list of bankruptcies continues to grow!
On July 23, @BitMEX announced that its operations would be closed starting from 04:00:00 UTC on September 23, 2026.
On July 24, @odosprotocol announced that the app would switch to read-only mode on July 27, and all Odos services would be permanently shut down on July 30, 2026.
July 25 @dango announced the termination of the project. On Wednesday, August 13, at 12:00 UTC, the Dango L1 blockchain will cease operations.
On July 25, Poolin @officialpoolin, once the world's largest Bitcoin mining pool, filed for bankruptcy.
July 26 @BitMartExchange Announced that all trading services will cease on August 26, 2026, 01:00 UTC. On January 31, 2027, 15:59 UTC: Platform operations will officially cease.
Looking at these death lists, there are basically two types of deaths:
1⃣ Fake demand is exposed; in a bull market, just start financing with infrastructure or aggregators, but in a bear market, it's clear there is no commercial closed loop.
2⃣ Leverage backfired, and Coinyin, which seemed stable as a leveraged method, was also wiped out. It could have jumped on this AI wave and sold at a good price, but unfortunately, it died before dawn.
In the second half of a bear market, if you can hold your capital and avoid pitfalls, you've already outperformed 90% of people.📊 $ZEC Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $3,530.82
· 4 hours: $49,000
· 12 hours: $191,600
· 24 hours: $574,100
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $3,530.82 $0 100%
4h $4,686.80 $44,300 9.6%
12h $11,400 $180,200 5.9%
24h $93,900 $480,200 16.4%
Duokong interpretation
100% of the 1-hour long liquidations ($3,530.82) were made, but the scale was so small that it could be ignored; From the 4-hour onward, short liquidation suddenly crushed the bulls (accounting for 90.4%), initiating a short squeeze rally; The 12-hour short position ratio reached as high as 94.1%, the most intense short squeeze of the day; Within 24 hours, short positions were liquidated at $480,200 (83.7%), with short squeezes continuing into the later stages. Ultimate winner: Bulls—showing a pattern of "short-term disturbances → persistent extreme short squeezes," with bears suffering devastating liquidation.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.62% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 8.54% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 33.38% of 24 hours
Liquidations are concentrated in the 12-hour cycle (about one-third), but the total 24-hour volume is 3.00 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating a sharp escalation of short squeezes in the 12-24 hours (about $382,500 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 66.6% of the day). Currently, the market is at the peak of a short squeeze, with bears suffering heavy losses, but after extreme gains, caution is needed to be aware of the risk of sharp pullbacks.
A one-sentence explanation
$ZEC 24-hour short liquidation at $480,200, accounting for 83.7% of the total, with short squeezes dominating and upgrades in the later stages, the bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress Trump reported $1.4B+ in crypto income for 2025.
Breakdown from his financial disclosure:
$635M — $TRUMP meme coin sales
$770M— World Liberty Financial
$520M from token sales
$250M from selling business interests
That’s a 9x jump from last year. Crypto is now his largest source of income.
Meanwhile the Senate can’t move the CLARITY Act.
Democrats argue you can’t have a president regulating crypto while making $1B+ from it.
Republicans argue the bill shouldn’t be written around one person.
The current draft would ban sitting officials from issuing or sponsoring new digital assets.
But it doesn’t fully address family-run projects.
Conflict or not — this is why ethics is holding up the biggest crypto bill in years.
NFA. DYOR. Watch the disclosures, not just the charts.
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause #EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause 币圈真硬？还是美股先露怯了？短线上看得出劲儿，但别急着当追单信号，这盘面谁冲动谁吃瘪。
看数字
$BTC 64,440 +0.57% $ETH 1,885 +1.24%
$QQQ -1.12% $SPY +0.10% $IBIT -0.82%
$DXY +0.03% $GLD +0.10%
原油和霍尔木兹那边一哆嗦，通胀预期就没老实过。币圈跟ETF还在抢风险偏好，可AI、半导体这些老剧本一翻页，$QQQ 的情绪开关随时能把全市场带劈叉。钱明显往防守方向上缩，$QQQ 那点劲儿根本撑不住场子。
$ETH 今天比 $BTC 弹性大，风险偏好还在挣扎着往上顶，可 $IBIT 跑得比现货软一截，ETF端进场的钱收敛了，说明现货没那么敢扛。$DXY 硬个头就压着风险资产喘不上气，$GLD 还红着，避险的钱压根没跑干净，留着后手呢。
一顿分析猛如虎，涨跌还看特朗普。别着急下注，等更明确的信号，谁先露怯谁就先定方向。拭目以待。
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零Recently, market sentiment has warmed up, and $SHIB has seen a strong rebound. In just two trading days, the price started around $0.0000042, reaching a high of $0.0000058, with a maximum increase of nearly 36% during the range. Its market capitalization rose by about $1 billion simultaneously, reassembling it among the top 30 crypto assets by market cap. Many people simply attribute this round of rally to MEME sector rotational speculation, but considering on-chain, tokenomics, and capital flow data, the market-driven logic is far more complex than surface sentiment. First, let's review SHIB's underlying token framework, which is the foundation for understanding all market trends. The initial total supply of SHIB was 1,000 trillion, with 500 trillion transferred to the Vitalik burn address during launch, laying the foundation for the project's deflationary nature. As of the latest Shibburn on-chain statistics, the total amount burned has reached 410.84 trillion, accounting for 41.08% of the original supply, permanently deprived of the circulating market; Currently, the circulating market supply remains at 589.16 trillion coins. Many market participants tend to misunderstand that continuous burning will quickly cause supply shortages. Objective data clearly shows that early burns exceeding 400 trillion were concentrated in 2021, a one-time large-scale burn, with daily community burns relatively limited in the past year. On the eve of this rally, the daily regular burn volume mostly stayed in the millions of tokens, but during the market kickoff, the 24-hour burn rate surged by up to 1400%, with 6.75 million tokens burned in a single day, and the burning frenzy rapidly heating up.Many players are used to speculating on MEME and AI hot coins, so switching to $OKB easily leads to pitfalls. They often wonder: why does the hot market keep surging, but OKB often remains lukewarm? Today, let's break down and talk about the underlying gameplay of this platform coin. Let's start with the underlying background: OKB is the native token of the OKX exchange, and has long been more than just a simple exchange points. In the early days, its main functions were fee deductions and participation in new token subscriptions on platforms; A major upgrade followed, with a permanent lock of 21 million tokens, completely closing the new minting channel, and making it the native gas token of the X Layer 2 network. Simply put, OKB has a dual value foundation: on one hand, it relies on centralized exchange transaction fee buyback and burning; on the other, it undertakes the development needs of the second-layer public chain ecosystem. Compared to altcoins that tell stories out of thin air, they have real and continuous business cash flow as a foundation, which is the fundamental reason for their stronger resilience during bear markets. Let's clarify the core logic of the current market: hot small coins rely on speculative funds for short-term rallying, causing sentiment to surge continuously; But OKB's price is tightly tied to two things: the exchange's overall trading volume and the large-scale ecosystem event launched by the official team. During market frenzy, funds favor highly elastic theme coins and look down on platform coins with slow paces; But once the market falls into volatility and market risks rise, funds start clustering together with platform coins to hedge risks. This creates its unique trending feature: it's hard to surge in prices, and big drops often lag behind the knockoffs. It's hard to see a single-day main upward wave of 20 to 30 points; more of it is a volatile upward movement and repeated pull-up cycles. A few that can be tracked in the future⚠️🏅 $YGG /USDT Market Alert 📊
YGG is holding around $0.0186 with improving sentiment. Support lies near $0.0180, while resistance is around $0.0195 and $0.0205. 🎯 Target: $0.0195 → $0.0205 → $0.0220. 🎯 Stop Loss: $0.0177. 🛑 Next Move: A breakout above $0.0195 could spark fresh bullish momentum, while losing support may trigger a short-term pullback. 💯#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #KoreaAIChipPush 📊 $OKB Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $153.74
· 4 hours: $158.06
· 12 hours: $158.06
· 24 hours: $37,600
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $153.74 0%
4h $0 $158.06 0%
12h $0 $158.06 0%
24h $0 $37,600 0%
Duokong interpretation
Short liquidations account for 100% of the cycles, while long liquidations account for zero, indicating an extreme unilateral short squeeze upward trend. In the first 12 hours, liquidation was extremely small (about $154~$158), with mild short squeezes initiating; 24-hour liquidation surged to $37,600, with short squeeze conditions exploding in 12-24 hours. Ultimate winner: Bulls—Bearish and late trading face concentrated and devastating liquidation.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.41% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.42% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 0.42% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely late: the first 12 hours accounted for only 0.42%, while the total 24-hour volume is about 238 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that the short squeeze market exploded in the latter half. Currently, the market is at the peak of a short squeeze, with concentrated liquidations on short positions at the close, but after extreme gains, caution is needed regarding the risk of sharp corrections.
A one-sentence explanation
$OKB 24-hour short liquidation at $37,600, accounting for 100%, followed by explosive upgrades in the following 12 hours, with bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress $BTC futures demand is increasing further. The positive value of futures demand indicates that real demand is emerging.
However, spot demand remains negative. Total demand is negative because the negative value of spot demand is larger.
A real rally must be accompanied by real demand. Currently, real demand is occurring in the futures market but futures market is still negative demand.
A real rally will begin when real demand emerges in the spot market.Is this truly the "Altcoin Season," or is it yet another "noise" driven by emotional bullishness? 👀
On the surface, the bullish market and local spikes have sharply intensified FOMO (panic buying highs) sentiment. However, the true hallmark of the knockoff season is **a broad rally across the market and widespread liquidity**. What we are currently experiencing is nothing more than the brutal rotation of existing funds in a very few assets, rather than the overall expansion of incremental capital.
Main funds are highly concentrated in a very small number of leading assets, while the vast majority of tokens cannot sustain sustained buying demand.
### 📊 Liquidity Camp Division and Chip Structure
* **Strong Capital Absorption Zone (Stock Focus)**: $BTC, $JELLYJELLY, $OPG, $SLX, $LAB, $BSB, $ALLO, $CHIP
* **Momentum Maintenance Zone (Local Heat)**: $MEME, $EDEN, $HUMA, $ZKP, $METIS
* **Momentum decline/stagnation zone (lack of buying)**: $BEAT, $EDGE, $COAI, $TRUMP, $RAVE, $SPACE, $SOPH, $IP, $AVNT, $ZAMA, $OFC, $PIEVERSE, $VIRTUAL, $ACU, $H, $MEGA
### 🏛️ Core Asset Anchors and Value Revaluation
| Target | Market Role and Positioning | Latest Updates / Reference Benchmark |
|---|---|---|
| **$BTC** | **The King 👑 of Liquidity** | Currently quoted at **$64,530** (up 0.92% intraday), the total crypto market capitalization across the network remains at **$2.18 trillion**, still the absolute anchor of the market
| **$ETH** | **Institutional Application Park** | Currently quoted around **$1,880**, the increase in staking lock-up continues to reduce spot selling pressure. |
| **$SOL** | **High Beta Elasticity Betting** | Ecosystem activity remains high, making it the preferred battleground for seeking excess returns beyond the broader market
| **$TAO / $WLD** | **AI Narrative Duo** | Deeply tied to OpenAI and the latest developments in the global semiconductor industry chain
| **$HYPE** | **Risk Appetite Barometer** | A core indicator for measuring the flow of funds with high leverage and high risk appetite
| **$DOGE / $ZEC** | **Retail Investor Emotions and Privacy Battles** | A mirror-like reflection of retail investors' risk appetite and privacy avoidance sentiment
### 📰 Macroeconomic Drivers and News Catalysts
1. **Regulatory Bill Suspension (#CLARITYActStalled)**:
The U.S. Congressional CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633) Due to conflicts of interest and strict moral review clauses, the Senate agenda was temporarily postponed until after the August recess. This policy uncertainty has made large compliance institutions more cautious when fully deploying al-coins.
2. **Temporary Easing of Geopolitical Tensions (#USIranStrikePause)**:
The U.S. has suspended strikes on specific Middle Eastern facilities and has not seen any new military escalations, easing macro risk aversion. While oil prices retreated, the crypto market was given a breathing room.
> **The Harsh Truth**: Only when liquidity is fully implemented and market participation explodes simultaneously across all sectors does the real altcoin season arrive, not just dominate headlines with just 5 tokens.
>
Before this: **Strictly control risk, follow capital flows, decisively reject FOMO chasing highs. ** 📈
#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause 四年没这么安静过了，兄弟们。2017年进场的那些远古巨鲸，终于不砸盘了。不是不砸，是特么砸不动了，该跑的早跑了。刚刚看到数据，休眠的$BTC活动量跌到了2022年三季度以来的最低点。什么概念？2022年那会儿刚从69000崩下来，大家一起装死。现在又来了。说实话，这事儿比任何技术指标都真实。你们想啊，去年底$BTC冲到十几万的时候，OG们疯狂出货，钱包里躺了七八年的币全活了。那波利润兑现完，现在手里要么没货，要么剩的都是零成本仓位。零成本的$BTC，人家急什么？不急着卖。这就是市场的默契。大资金不动，小资金乱窜。山寨季玩得欢，主流币反而稳得一批。我翻了翻链上数据，最近一个月移动的老币少得可怜。上一次这么安静，后面发生了什么？横盘四个月，然后一根大阳线捅破天。别误会，我不是说这次也一样。但有一点很清楚：抛压真的在衰竭。前几个月$BTC跌下来的时候，我说别慌，现在我还是这句话。大饼要真崩，OG们不会这么淡定的。他们最敏感，跑得比谁都快。现在集体装死，说明什么？说明真正的恐慌，还没来。做空的兄弟们自己掂量，你面前是全世界最惜售的一群Holder。他们不卖，你去哪借币砸？当然，牛市不会一天就来Well-known trader Kla tweeted that Bitcoin's cycle is accelerating. In the previous cycle, it took only 476 days to go from bottom to record high, much faster than the previous two rounds. He expects this round to break the previous high ahead of the next halving.
To be honest, the trend of shortening cycles is already quite obvious. The reasons behind this are not hard to guess—institutional funds, ETFs, and macro liquidity are flowing in, causing the market to react much faster than before. Combined with social media and leverage tools, the speed of sentiment and price transmission is simply not on the same level. The old stereotype of "every four years a bull and bear" might really need to be changed now.
However, acceleration has two sides. On one hand, if you're still waiting for some "standard right-side signal," you might miss out on a significant rally in the blink of an eye; On the other hand, acceleration means a stronger pullback, and the probability of getting stuck after chasing highs rises sharply. So instead of getting caught up in left and right sides, it's better to manage your positions well, build positions in batches, set stop-losses, and don't let emotions run wild. As for his mention of "new highs before the halving," I think it's quite likely, but that doesn't mean a big pit won't be hit first. In short, focusing on macro data and capital flows is far more reliable than stubbornly stubbornly obsessing over historical patterns. 😂 📊 $XAUT Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $194.64
· 4 hours: $194.64
· 12 hours: $5,107.83
· 24 hours: $36,000
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $194.64 0%
4h $0 $194.64 0%
12h $60.82 $5,047.01 1.2%
24h $30,800 $5,176.69 85.6%
Duokong interpretation
In the first 12 hours, short liquidation crushed long positions (short positions accounted for 98.8%~100%), and prices continued to rise; Within 24 hours, long positions were liquidated at $30,800, strongly overtaking (accounting for 85.6%), with a sharp reversal occurring within 12-24 hours, turning into a one-sided downtrend. Ultimate winner: Bears—showing a pattern of "short squeeze upward→ surge and pullback, extreme long selling."
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.54% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.54% of 24 hours
· 12 hours account for 14.2% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely late: the first 12 hours accounted for only 14.2%, while the 24-hour total is 7.05 times the 12-hour volume, indicating a strong burst in the 12-24 hours (about $30,900 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 85.8% of the day). Currently, the market is in a bear-led sustained sharp decline, and in the short term, attention should be paid to technical recovery signals after oversold conditions.
A one-sentence explanation
$XAUT 24-hour long liquidation at $30,800, accounting for 85.6% of the total, with an early short squeeze followed by extreme bullish selling at the close, with bears winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress SK Hynix
SK Hynix's stock price has fluctuated sharply, but the AI server has not been equipped with a single HBM block as a result.
SK Hynix is sending samples of 12-layer HBM4E to major customers and collaborating with NVIDIA on next-generation AI memory, expanding its growth strategy from HBM to AI DRAM, NAND, and enterprise-grade SSDs. AI computing power development remains a long-term tailwind, but the market is beginning to worry: whether current storage prices and profit margins are close to cycle highs, and whether price competition will resume after Samsung and Micron's expansions.
US ADRs have recently fluctuated sharply around $156, showing a clear premium over Korean common stocks, indicating investors are not only betting on companies but also paying for scarcity. Technically, focus on support at $150 to $153; if it falls below it, target $145; The main resistance above is $164 to $170.
SK Hynix's long-term logic hasn't disappeared, but the most dangerous short-term thing may be "good news everyone knows." Do you think this is a golden pit for AI memory, or a reminder before the storage cycle shifts?
$SKHY #SK海力士 #HBM #AIThe early rally of $ORDI truly ignited the first wave of BRC20 inscription booms, and during that rally, market liquidity was basically dominated by domestic players.
The scale is no longer what it used to be. Today, ORDI is no longer just a target for Chinese players; global Bitcoin ecosystem participants are closely watching its rise and fall. Especially now, with Rune $DOG continuing to weaken and narratives lacking, overseas funds will further solidify ORDI's position as the leading Bitcoin native asset.
But don't expect the market to start immediately; ORDI will continue to fluctuate and shake out, and another half year of grinding is a reasonable scenario. Even if a major bull market has not yet arrived, local hotspots within the sector will continue to emerge: emerging protocols and underlying platforms such as Alkanes, Subfrost, Tap-Nat, Radfi, and Bound will continue to generate phased opportunities.
The narrative of the track keeps iterating, with hot topics alternating between old and new, but ORDI, as the emotional anchor of the Bitcoin ecosystem, holds an unshakable position in the short term.Changxin Memory's IPO P/E ratio reached 300? Can it still be played?
┈➤ 25-year static P/E ratio
◆ #长鑫存储 Opens tomorrow, issue price 8.66,
◆ New shares 6,688,088,608 million (accounting for 10% of total shares),
◆ Net profit attributable to the parent company at the end of 2015 was 1,874.8594 million yuan.
◆ According to A-share IPO standards, calculate the 25-year static price-to-earnings ratio:
PE=8.66*668,808.8608*10/187,485.94=308.92
But this is static data from the end of 2025, and the market may and should calculate and value based on dynamic data.
┈➤ Rolling P/E ratio for Q2 2025~Q1 2026
◆ Parent company net profit in Q2~Q1 2025
= Full year 2025 + Q1 2026 - Q1 2025
=187,485.94+2,476,203.15-(-155,902.79)
=2,819,591.88
◆ Calculate the rolling price-to-earnings ratio of the IPO price
PE-TTM【25Q2~26Q1】
=8.66*668,808.8608*10/2,819,591.88
=20.54
┈➤ Rolling P/E Ratio for Q3 2025~Q2 2026 (Conservative Estimate)
The parent company's net profit announced for the first half of 2026 is 5,000,000~5,700,000, following a prudent principle and setting the lower limit.
◆ Parent company net profit in Q3~Q2 2026
= Full year 2025 + First half of 2026 - First half of 2025
=187,485.94+5,000,000-(-233,205.82)
=5,420,691.76
◆ Calculate the rolling price-to-earnings ratio of the IPO price
PE-TTM【25Q3~26Q2】
=8.66*668,808.8608*10/5,420,691.76
=10.68┈ ➤ Final note
Cambricon's PE is now 285, with a high of 371.
Hygon Information's PE is currently 267, with a peak of 315.
First, some people compare Changxin Memory to SK Hynix, but there's actually no comparison.
Due to market differences, SK Hynix, as the storage dragon, has a lower P/E ratio than Micron
$MU
Even SanDisk $SNDK. This is due to the environmental and sentiment differences between the Korean and US stock markets.
Therefore, you can't compare Changxin Memory to SK Hynix. You can refer to AI stocks on the A-share market,
Cambricon's PE is now 285, with a high of 371.
Hygon Information's PE is currently 267, with a peak of 315.
Second, based on profits at the end of 2025, Changxin Memory's P/E ratio is 308.9.
However, the market may value based on updated data.
Based on Q2 2025~Q1 2026, the rolling P/E ratio is 20.54. Based on a cautious estimate from Q3 2025~Q2 2026, the rolling P/E ratio is 10.68.
Therefore, after the market opens, Changxin Memory Technologies theoretically still has some room to rise.
Third, the overall trend of the storage sector is still uncertain whether it has bottomed out.
Fourth, Changxin Memory's main product is DRAM. Compared to HBM, AI may have a weaker rigid demand for DRAM.
Fifth, Changxin Memory was still operating at a loss in the first half of 2025, with profits surging in 2026. Whether this sharp upward trend can be sustained will only be proven over time.
Brother Bee has never played with the A-share market and has little say, but theoretically, Changxin Memory should have no problem reaching 17 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] about 20).
Optimistically, it could reach around 40 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] about 50).
If extremely optimistic, it could exceed 70 or even reach 80 (PE-TTM [25Q3~26Q2] close to 100).
The reason for such a large valuation gap is the huge profit gap between 2025 and 2026. Whether this growth trend will explode in the short term or continue in the long term remains uncertain.Guys, YGG rose 4.21% today, currently priced at $0.01854. Behind this bullish candlestick, the core catalyst comes from expectations of a strategic restructuring of the project: on July 7, YGG officially announced the closure of its game publishing division YGG Play, laying off 35 employees, and games like LOL Land will officially delaunch on July 31. This move is not a project crisis, but rather a shift in focus to AI game behavior data services, with player behavior datasets usable for AI model training, and the market speculating on its long-term potential to enter the AI data track. Technical Aspects: Support at 0.0185-0.0187; resistance above is seen at 0.0192/0.0200/0.0210, with the previous high at 0.0212 forming strong resistance; Below is a key defensive position at 0.0175. Core risk: Trading volume heavily depends on the futures market, with contract size significantly higher than spot trading. Leverage funds dominate the market, making the structure fragile and causing amplified volatility. With only a few days left until YGG Play officially shuts down on July 31, the market is weighing the narrative expectations of transformation, and caution is needed to watch out for selling pressure that may materialize after the event materializes. Key point: Currently, the AI data business is still in the strategic planning stage and has no revenue from implementation; At the same time, YGG tokens do not have the capability to capture business revenue. These are event-driven, high-volatility short-term targets, with the bottom line of the game being fast in and out. Do not mistake short-term thematic rebounds for trend reversals; strictly manage positions and risks. Personal market viewsToday, seeing BitMex and BitMart both cease operations one after another is somewhat disappointing. During the year-long slow bear market, many Web3 projects have disappeared or reskinned, and hot money in the market is gradually flowing into the AI field
I think the reason these two exchanges shut down in the same week despite such a coincidence is another reason:
1. Liquidity is concentrated in leading exchanges, so most retail investors and whales usually choose platforms with the deepest orders, lowest slippage, and the most counterparties. The worse the liquidity, the fewer users there are; the fewer users, the further the number of users drops, and then you step on the right foot and enter a death spiral.
2. Hyperliquid, an on-chain trading platform, is eating into CEX's market share. Traders can self-custody assets on these DEXs, and platform rules and reserves are more transparent. This makes it even harder for established contract exchanges without a spot ecosystem or institutional custody business to survive
3. Rising compliance costs. The old Cayman registration and global service approach no longer works. Web3 ecosystems in Europe, North America, Singapore, and Hong Kong are all becoming more standardized, inevitably leading to companies like Bitmex, which lag behind and have to stop operations in Europe due to compliance issues
4. The platform token begins to backlash, another death spiral: when the exchange faces operational difficulties, the price of the platform token falls, then the decline leads users to reduce holdings, collateral and financial reserves are compiled, the market doubts the platform's solvency, and then it stamps on the right again until it hits rock bottom
It is unclear whether the halts of these two exchanges have reached the bottom of the bear market or have only just begun. But no matter what, I still hope the industry keeps getting better, that everyone can make money and have something to eat#新手必看：这里有你需要的一切
今天看到 RootData 发布的最新统计，2026 年年内已经有 99 个加密项目宣布停止运营、破产或网站彻底瘫痪。名单里不乏大家耳熟能详的名字：从老牌合约衍生品平台 BitMEX、BitMart、AscendEX，到极好用的链上看板和钱包工具 Zapper、Parsec、Leap、Ctrl，再到 DeFi 协议 Stream Finance 和 Altura。
看完这 99 个死亡名单，说实话，我不仅没感到悲观，反倒觉得这是行业高利率环境下极具血腥、但也极为健康的“去水分大清洗”。
仔细拆解这些死亡项目的特征，背后只有一条极其残酷的铁律：靠讲故事和代币印钞补贴存活的时代过去了。
这 99 个项目的死亡，主要踩中了三大致死病因：
第一个死因，是纯前端工具协议的“价值捕获黑洞”。像 Zapper、Parsec、Leap 这种看板和钱包，产品体验确实不错，但纯前端缺乏原生代币的利益捕获机制，没有商业闭环。在熊市和存量博弈期，高昂的节点与服务器运维成本直接把团队现金流给耗干了。
第二个死因，是通胀庞氏挖矿的彻底失效。Stream Finance 这类协议，过去靠印自己的治理代币给高 APY 吸引流动性。但在 10 年美债 4.7% 的无风险利率压制下，聪明资金宁可拿着美债，也不愿意去陪你玩空气代币通胀的游戏。补贴一停，池子立刻沦为死城。
第三个死因，是二线 CEX 的流动性流失与合规反噬。随着 Solana 链上 DEX 交易量超越传统合规 CEX，加上 BitMEX 诉讼等监管合规成本飙升，中小型 CEX 的生存空间被链上 DEX 和头部合规巨头双向挤压，流动性枯竭后只能破产离场。
我的结论：这 99 个项目的集体死亡，是市场在帮你做清洗删减。未来能活下来的，要么是底层具备极强网络效应的头部公链/DEX，要么是能源源不断创造真实法币收入（Real Revenue）和协议分红的 Real Yield 蓝筹。
这 99 个死亡项目里，有你曾经用过或踩过坑的吗？欢迎在评论区聊聊。TSLA暴跌的实质是：市场不是否定特斯拉的未来，
而是在要求这些未来业务更快、更清楚地体现在财务报表上。
特斯拉上涨的必要条件是：FSD v15顺利推送、Robotaxi规模化运营、
Optimus量产爬坡——三者至少有两个取得实质性突破。
上涨的充分条件是：在上述突破发生的同时，汽车毛利率企稳、自由现金流改善，让市场相信"烧钱阶段"即将过去。
当前特斯拉正处于从"卖车故事"切换到"AI故事"的阵痛期。
市场愿意等，但不会无限期地等。接下来的每一份季报，都是对"故事能否变成现实"的一次大考。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ $TSLA STRC's paper losses blew up a group yesterday. Treasury's book numbers forcibly pushed preferred stock discounts into an industry-wide credit test. To be honest, the moment I saw the Strive holdings exposed, I felt this wasn't that simple. It's not just one company's pressure, but everyone's problem. When $BTC broke below support, those telling stories about paper profits suddenly realized their preferred shares had become hot potatoes. The discount rate was much faster than expected, and liquidity drained the entire Bitcoin market The treasury valuation model is shaking. Sisters, stay calm. It's not that I'm trying to create anxiety, but this contagion is really fast. A book loss from a treasury can make an entire institution reprice the risk of Bitcoin holdings. The balance sheet management that was hyped up last year has become a tightening curse this year. The key isn't whether you have $MSTR, but treasuries with similar patterns Everyone is being re-evaluated. STRC is just the first domino to fall. Behind it are a bunch of people using the same logic to snowball. I'm not chasing highs or in a hurry to sell. Let's first see how the US stock market reacts tonight. If no one even accepts the discount on preferred stocks, that would be the real big problem. Is there still hope for treasury? Which side are you on on this topic? #芯片股反弹, short positions in U.S. stocks hit a record high #加密行情回暖, Bitcoin rose #美股全线走高, and crypto stocks led the gains This time, there was no new name that made me willing to raise my attention; instead, two old observation items gave completely different signals.
HBULL is currently about $0.00157, with a market capitalization of about $1.5 million, liquidity of about $125,000, and a 24-hour trading volume of about $872,000. Real transactions still exist, but RugCheck has a new tip that one address holds 25.83%. The project team stated that the large tokens are in the staking vault, but I have not yet been able to independently confirm the correspondence between this address and the publicly available staking procedure. About 97.97% of the main pool liquidity certificates are locked, and the rights for additional issuance and freezing have been revoked; Before the use of large addresses is proven, I just treat it as a routine observation.
Contract: 7V6Sk63y8Rr1MvcN5mYNp61wgFhy4EeQg5gUASk9pump
https://dexscreener.com/solana/edx18gjcdijqslaja2pp5c2vma3btrrx4utxkejufrtq
BUB is earlier and more dangerous. Within about four hours, the number of holding addresses increased from 1,027 to 2,292, with about 3,537 independent traders and approximately $1.2 million in transactions; However, during the same period, the price pulled back about 30%, liquidity dropped to around $27,000–$29,000, and the turnover was more than forty times the liquidity. Tokens are temporarily dispersed, the main pool is nearly 100% locked, the proportion of bots is unknown, and the project has no verifiable official relationship with Lil BUB's original IP.
Contract: 4FaSuBUp15t9Qiar9MdpaspkZJU5RK6A3QLnybNCpump
https://dexscreener.com/solana/J1GuZspgz3kxJqgngTGsR5QyJioSLAoZnApFd2yvtVsR
Next, I will verify three things: whether the HBULL large address can prove it is a bound vault; Whether buyback and reward transactions can be aligned consecutively; After BUB's hype cools down, can its holdings and liquidity remain? Large addresses concentrating into the pool, HBULL main pool lock-up continues to drop significantly, or BUB liquidity continues to rapidly drain away, all of which make me stop watching.
High-risk research records, not trade advice.On July 26, $SHIB emerged in an independent super rally without any fundamental improvements, project announcements, or ecosystem updates. The intraday peak surged 36%, with the price hitting $0.0000057, and the market capitalization surged by $1 billion in a single day, pushing the total market cap past $3.4 billion. 1. The Real Core of This Round of Rallies — Korean Kimchi Funds Dominate the Market This rally is not a consensus among all online funds but rather concentrated speculation in a single region: South Korea's leading exchange Upbit's $SHIB/KRW trading pair recorded a single-day trading volume of $62 million, accounting for over 10% of global trading volume. Moreover, the Korean session continues to perform at a slight premium over the mainstream US dollar market, which proves that this round of $SHIB's surge was entirely driven unilaterally by Korean retail funds. 2. Severe sector fragmentation, capital tightly clusters $SHIB This round of meme coin rally is not a broad rally but an extreme structural rally: - $DOGE Only rose 6% during the same period - Other dog-type imitation stocks generally rose less than 10% Capital is highly concentrated and solely focused on $SHIB, with very weak follow-up within the sector and no overall sector resonance support. 3. Contract liquidation data clarification: Short closing is not the driving force behind the rally. During this rally, a total of 2,300 users liquidated $SHIB positions across the network, with a total liquidation amount of $6 million. Of this, short positions were liquidated about $5 million. Key Core Conclusion: Short liquidation is merely a passive result after price increases, and is by no means the driving force behind this rally📊 $BCH Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $96.06
· 4 hours: $293.63
· 12 hours: $48,400
· 24 hours: $58,300
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $96.06 $0 100%
4h $189.26 $104.37 64.5%
12h $32,000 $16,300 66.1%
24h $36,200 $22,100 62.1%
Duokong interpretation
Forced liquidations dominated all periods (24-hour bulls accounted for 62.1%), indicating a sustained one-sided downward trend. 1-12 hour long positions account for 64.5%~100%, with almost no resistance on the bears; Although there was a 24-hour short liquidation at $22,100 (accounting for 37.9%), bulls still dominated. Ultimate winner: Bears—The price shows a continuous one-sided downward trend, while the bulls have cleared out consecutive stop-losses.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.16% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 0.50% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 83.0% of 24 hours
Extreme liquidations are concentrated in the 12-hour cycle (over 80%), indicating that the main downward wave has erupted within 12 hours; The total 24-hour volume is 1.20 times that of the 12-hour period, and in the following 12 hours, the bullish continues, but its intensity weakens. Currently, the market is at the end of a bear-led sustained decline, with the bullish forces basically cleared out. In the short term, we need to wait for signals of shrinking volume.
A one-sentence explanation
$BCH 24-hour long liquidations at $36,200, accounting for 62% of total volume; 12-hour concentrated breakout mainly triggered a decline, with bears winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress The European crypto scene is undergoing a silent reshuffle!
Don't focus on the candlestick for now—look for deeper changes.
In Europe, the MiCA regulation is fully implemented, and the UK FCA is also nearing finalizing the framework.
But the key is no longer just about getting a license.
The real threshold is the cost of compliance, which directly determines who survives.
To get straight to my point:
The survival space of crypto-native small businesses is being squeezed, while traditional banks, relying on their existing compliance foundations, are preparing to enter and harvest the profits.
The UK is even more aggressive, refusing to establish an independent crypto regime and directly bringing crypto activities into traditional financial regulation, aligning standards with those of investment banks.
This means that the previously wild growth path basically no longer works in Europe.
Here are a few points that ordinary people can take:
1. If you are an industry practitioner, don't just settle for obtaining a license; quickly assess the long-term compliance costs, as this is more critical than the license itself.
2. For crypto companies looking to break through, proactively seeking cooperation talks with traditional financial institutions with compliant infrastructure, or even accepting mergers and acquisitions, may be a clear path.
3. As investors, pay attention to crypto assets and related targets that already have compliance advantages or can be integrated into the traditional financial system at low cost.
Of course, the risk boundaries need to be clearly defined.
The scale and speed of this wave of acquisitions will depend on market conditions and the specific enforcement of regulations.
Moreover, overly strict regulation may push innovation to other regions, which would actually be a long-term loss for Europe itself.
This article is only a trend analysis and does not constitute any investment advice. Market changes always happen faster than expected.
Disclaimer: Information is only for information organization and logical review, and does not constitute any investment advice. The market carries risks; please conduct your own research.
$BTC$ETH$BNB#European regulation$PEPE Breaking through 0.00000304 was mainly driven by SHIB overflow and a decrease in exchange withdrawal stock, but the RSI6 reached 82.32, indicating that short-term liquidity has been overdrawn, making chasing highs very cost-effective.
The decline in exchange stock combined with the surge in Upbit trading volume formed the core buying interest. Compared to the long-term narrative of the second-half roadmap, the direct pull of SHIB sector capital spillover on spot liquidity is more obvious.
If spot buying remains strong and holds above the 0.00000304 to 0.00000305 resistance zone, the short-term liquidity push target will point to the 0.0000032 to 0.0000033 range. The scenario is effective if the 0.00000300 level is pushed back without breaking below and Upbit overflow funds show no sign of decline.
Once the 0.00000305 resistance level triggers intense selling pressure, profit-taking will push the price back to the first support band between 0.0000027 and 0.0000028. If it breaks further below the 0.0000025 to 0.0000024 support line, the 35% gains accumulated from the July 10 low of 0.0000022 will trigger a chain liquidation.
When the price smoothly breaks through 0.0000033 and the RSI6 falls back to the healthy range below 70, the short-term overbought correction prediction is declared invalid.
In the next 24 hours, focus on changes in Upbit's trading volume and the capital support at the 0.0000027 support level.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, progress in negotiations on the opening of the strait #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零Changxin Technology will open tomorrow for its IPO, and overseas AI giants face a "major test" in their earnings reports.
Next week is the last trading week of the month, and the market is about to experience two major key market moments:
First, Changxin Technology, the top IPO of the year in the A-share market, officially debuted on the STAR Market, directly reshaping the domestic memory sector landscape;
Second, the global storage giants + US AI weights collectively disclosed their earnings reports, resonating in both domestic and international markets, directly finalizing the mid-term trends of the chip and technology sectors.
Insider funds have mostly been watching and gathering strength this week, with the market accelerating completely starting tomorrow.
▶️ Changxin's IPO revenue gradient
Changxin issue price at 8.66 yuan per share, with a fixed 500 shares per STAR Market contract, a participation capital of 4,330 yuan, and an initial market capitalization of 579.2 billion yuan.
Based on the multi-dimensional valuation model of brokers, below are the range aligned with institutional expectations, with different price increases corresponding to stock prices, total market capitalization, and single contract net profit gradients, and ranges aligned with institutional expectations:
✅ 100% increase | Market value 1.16 trillion yuan | Stock price 17.32 yuan | Net profit of 4,330 yuan per single sign
✅ Up 200% | Market value 1.74 trillion | Stock price 25.98 yuan | Net profit of 8,660 yuan per single contract
✅ Up 300% | Market cap 2.32 trillion yuan | Stock price 34.64 yuan | Net profit of 12,990 yuan per sign
✅ 400% increase | Market value 2.90 trillion yuan | Stock price 43.30 yuan | Net profit of 17,320 yuan per sign
✅ Up 500% | Market value 3.48 trillion yuan | Stock price 51.96 yuan | Net profit of 21,650 yuan per sign
✅ Up 600% | Market value 4.05 trillion yuan | Stock price 60.62 yuan | Net profit of 25,980 yuan per sign
Objectively speaking, considering conservative to ultra-optimistic valuations, the reasonable first-day fluctuation range is 70%-600%, corresponding to winning profits of 3,000-26,000 yuan. A rise of over 600% is purely market sentiment speculation, lacking fundamental support, and chasing the price with minimal cost-effectiveness.
▶️ The core logic of Changxin's valuation
There is significant market disagreement over Changxin's valuation, but the core logic is actually very clear. The initial market value of 579.2 billion yuan comes from genuine institutional inquiry pricing, providing a solid safety cushion rather than a sentiment-driven valuation.
The company's performance has surged this year, with a full annual profit forecast of 100 billion yuan. Compared to overseas storage giants, its current forward valuation is within a reasonable range. At the same time, as a rare domestic DRAM mass production target in A-shares, benefiting from expectations of domestic substitution and technological breakthroughs, it carries a valuation premium, with a reasonable valuation center of 1.5-2 trillion yuan.
A rational view of the market is needed. The storage industry has strong cyclical attributes, and current high performance relies on short-term AI dividends. Coupled with the company's ongoing technological gap with leading overseas firms, the high valuation driven by short-term sentiment creates pressure to absorb the gains, so blind chasing is not recommended.
▶️ A-share market forecast for tomorrow
Changxin's listing will directly affect the capital flow of the A-share technology sector. Tomorrow, the market will show obvious structural differentiation, with core changes concentrated in three points:
1. Capital Divergence: Large transactions in the secondary market will divert existing funds from tech tracks like AI hardware and semiconductor design. Without market growth, small tech stocks are likely to come under pressure.
2. Stock switching: With the establishment of leading storage manufacturing companies, funds will shift from marginal stocks like modules and controllers to Changxin's core leaders, clearly showing a trend of de-weak while keeping strong.
3. Industry Chain Benefits: The company's funds raised for capacity expansion and equipment procurement directly benefit upstream semiconductor equipment and materials supporting sectors, providing sustained catalysts.
▶️ Overseas Storage Financial Report Outlook
Next Wednesday, major overseas storage leaders will release their earnings reports in concentrated numbers, which will be key to verifying the current AI storage boom and will also influence the mid-term market outlook for A-share semiconductors:
▪️ SK Hynix (7.29): Predicts the industry shortage will continue into 2030, focusing on chip price increases as they take effect
▪️ Samsung (7.30): Early positive factors have been overwhelmed, focusing on HBM shipments and order guidance
▪️ Kioxia (7.31): Market value fluctuates sharply; earnings reports will verify the authenticity of industry prosperity
Institutions generally believe that the HBM capacity shortage will persist until 2027, and as long as the current financial data remains solid, the mid-term rally in the storage sector is likely to continue.
▶️ Reference for U.S. AI earnings sentiment
Next week, US AI tech giants will concentrate on earnings disclosures, and the market will show clear style divergence this year: heavy-asset semiconductors are strengthening, while tech companies that have made significant investments in AI are showing weakness, which can serve as a reference for the peripheral sentiment of the A-share tech sector.
The core suppression is that the market does not recognize the sustained capital investment of AI companies without returns; previously, Alphabet plunged due to excessive spending. This sentiment may slightly transmit to A-shares but will not change the independent market trend of domestic storage.
Overall, tomorrow it is advisable to focus on seizing the structural opportunity presented by Changxin's IPO and cautiously participate in secondary market chasing gains.
Next week, focus on tracking the performance of overseas storage earnings reports, avoid short-term sentiment fluctuations caused by US AI earnings, and pay attention to trading rhythm.Uni Short-term: All the good news has been exhausted, so early profit-taking is normal.
Voting on fee proposals (v4 protocol fees + Robinhood Chain scaling) ended on July 25, with extremely high support and entering queued mode, about to be executed. All new protocol fees will continue to flow into the existing UNI burn mechanism (TokenJar). Short-term traders treat "proposal approval" as event-driven and realize profits early, which is completely reasonable.
But from a long-term perspective, the significance of this matter goes far beyond "burning a bit more coins."
1. Significant increase in buyback/burn efforts
After the proposal passes, protocol fee coverage will be greatly expanded (v4 selected pools + Robinhood Chain v2/v3), and the burn pace will accelerate noticeably. Hayden himself has clearly stated that, based on current transaction volume, especially Robinhood Chain, the impact on UNI burn will be "substantial."
You can wait about a month for actual on-chain data to come out, then conduct a horizontal backtest against $HYPE's annual buyback ratio—the numbers will be more convincing.
2. Uniswap's innovation genes remain leading
v1/v2: Simplifying and popularizing AMM as the underlying standard for DeFi.
v3: Pioneered Hyundai CLAMM, allowing each LP to customize its price range within the same pool.
v4: Pioneered and centered on the Pool Lifecycle Hook, standardizing permissionless AMM extension architecture.
As the pioneer of DEXs, almost every major upgrade has redefined the industry's gameplay.
3. Default liquidity entry in reality
Currently, for most EVM chain launch platforms, Uniswap remains the preferred pool. v4's Hook gives launch platforms huge customization space (custom fees, dynamic logic, auction mechanisms, etc.). Of course, alpha launches on BSC are still dominated by Pancake, but Uniswap's position as a first-mover and standard remains solid in the overall landscape.
4. Scalability is far from the ceiling
New mechanisms like CCA auction issuance have already proven strong product expansion potential, though currently they are relatively restrained. This "capable but not overly aggressive" pace is actually more beneficial for long-term ecosystem health.
Previously, $UNI was criticized for being "unempowered," but now, through UNIfication + protocol fees, continuous burning, the value capture path has become clearer.
First-mover advantage + continuous product innovation + almost leading the evolution of on-chain DEXs allows for bolder possibilities—the true on-chain Nasdaq is not just empty talk.
Proposal Details:
vote.uniswapfoundation.org/proposals
What do you all think?
#新手必看: Everything you need is here
#RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard Key Rules for Trading New OKX Listings
Avoid Buying the First 15-Minute Candle: Initial spikes are often driven by pre-listing token holders taking profit.
Wait for Base Formation: Let the price establish a 1H/4H support level before opening positions.
Use Strict Stop-Losses: Liquidity depth can be thin in early days, leading to wider slippage during market-wide moves.
#EarningsRealityCheck
#CLARITYActStalled #KoreaAIChipPush