Orbit Post Sitemap
Last week, the Nasdaq fell 2.1% for the week, and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged 4.25% in a single week. The market's core anxiety is no longer about a decline in AI demand, but whether revenue and free cash flow can be realized amid massive capital expenditures and rising financing costs. This week, combined with the Federal Reserve's interest rate meeting, U.S. Q2 GDP, and June PCE inflation data, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Apple, SK Hynix, storage devices, and leading packaging and testing companies will release earnings reports, marking a critical test for the technology and storage sectors. 1. Key timeline - After market close on 7.27: APLD, AMKR (the first AI advanced packaging earnings report this week) - After market close on 7.28: STX, KLAC, TER; evening SK Hynix earnings conference - 7.29: Federal Reserve interest rate decision; after market close Microsoft, Meta, LRCX, Qualcomm, HOOD, FORM; next day Samsung earnings briefing - Before market open on 7.30: GDP, PCE data; after market close Amazon, Apple - Before market open on 7.31: ExxonMobil earnings 2. Key stock highlights + price ranges 1. Leading tech (overall market switch) - MSFT: Monitor Azure growth, Copilot commercialization, capital expenditure impact on profits; support at 378~382, resistance at 389~392, $400 as a trend recovery signal - META: Advertising revenue, AI conversion efficiency, full-year spending plan; support at 590~595, resistance at 610~615 - AMZN: AWS outlookPUMP 24小时涨了11.5%，如果你只盯着这根阳线，很容易觉得它要开始新一轮拉升了。但真正让我停下来看的是另一组数字：过去7天，价格几乎没动，30天却已经涨了50%。也就是说，这11.5%不过是把7月的横盘区间往上抬了一点，距离ATH还差77%，而且7月21日那根156M的天量（一个月最高）之后，成交量持续回落，到昨天只剩80M。表面看涨，实际上资金在犹豫——是高位接盘的人在减少，还是洗筹后等下一波，现在很难说。
我更在意的是，$PUMP 作为 平台代币，它的价格叙事高度依赖于平台的 meme 发射活跃度。30天涨50%很可能对应了一轮新玩法或空投预期，但7天原地踏步说明这个预期已经大部分被定价，下一个催化剂还没出现。如果成交量继续萎缩，或者平台数据（比如新币数量、用户活跃）走平甚至下降，那这50%的涨幅反而会成为回撤的蓄力区。
$PUMP #财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
谷歌和特斯拉的财报刚出，我的判断很明确：谷歌是“稳中有忧”的现金奶牛，而特斯拉则是“刀尖舔血”的高风险博弈。
先看谷歌，营收超预期但云业务增速放缓是隐忧。广告收入依然强劲，但AI投入带来的资本开支激增，正在吞噬利润率，市场担心它变成下一个“烧钱机器”。
具体数据上，谷歌云营收增速从上季度的28%降至26%，不及预期；资本开支同比增长30%以上，主要用于AI数据中心建设。这说明增长引擎在换挡期，短期阵痛难免。
我的操作思路是：长期持有谷歌作为底仓，但短期不追高，等云业务增速重新加速或资本开支见顶信号出现再加仓。
再看特斯拉，表面看交付量和利润双降，但FSD（全自动驾驶）的进展才是真正变量。马斯克在电话会里反复强调FSD即将在中国落地，这才是支撑估值的核心故事。
数据上，汽车毛利率跌至17.1%，为三年最低；但FSD订阅用户数环比增长40%，且中国监管审批已进入最后阶段。这意味着，如果FSD能规模化变现，当前股价其实被严重低估。
我的操作思路是：用不超过总仓位5%的资金做“期权式”布局——买正股+卖看涨期权，既保留上行空间，又降低持仓成本。若FSD中国落地消息确认，再考虑加仓。
最后说一句：别被“超预期”或“不及预期”带节奏，财报只是起点，真正的机会藏在管理层没说透的细节里。$BONK 治理漏洞转移2000万美元国库资金，打破了以国库储备支撑估值的逻辑，市场陷入清算与治理重塑的剧烈定价博弈。
$BONK 价格较近期高点回撤 50%，2000 万美元国库资金通过战略资金调配提案划转至个人地址，引发散户恐慌抛售与部分大户重新布局。该事件同时收紧了同样拥有数千万美元国库的 $PEPE 和 $WIF 的持仓风险偏好。
驱动因素按优先级排序为：国库筹码二次流向导致的抛压预期、代币权重投票机制引发的治理信任崩溃、以及筹码在腰斩位置的换手效率。
从事件风险传导来看，2000 万美元资金离场相当于市场新增同等规模的潜在抛压通胀，瞬间打压了整个 Meme 板块的风险偏好。散户恐慌抛售促使短期仓位快速出清，大户吸筹行为则在下方形成局部买盘支撑。
上行剧本条件：若项目方或核心社区出面干预并推进紧急治理框架修复，将扭转治理失控预期。需要观察 2000 万美元转出资金是否暂停兑现，以及高位筹码换手率是否降至 5% 以下。一旦紧急风控提案通过，价格可能出现阶段性超跌反弹，该剧本在突破跌幅黄金分割点时确认成立。
下行剧本条件：若划转资金开始在链上兑现，或社区抛售潮引发进一步连锁清算，盘面将打破当前区间。需要观察链上划转地址的动向以及持仓集中度的变化。若转出地址向交易终端大额转移资金，价格将面临二次筑底下探。
判断失效条件：若市场无视治理缺陷，在无紧急修复方案出台的情况下直接拉回腰斩前高点，表明驱动力由治理基本面转向博弈资金，当前基于风控缺失的推演即告失效。
未来 7 天重点观察 2000 万美元划转地址的链上变动，以及紧急治理提案的投票筹码分布。
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ #RWA永续月交易量4700亿美元 #交易之声：你的经验值得被听到（基于 OKX Orbit 热门话题 #财报观察员 earningsrealitycheck-164，2026/07/27 抓取：浏览 526.9 万、帖子 1,579；数据已对比前版刷新） 一、提炼核心事实：这周科技股到底发生了什么 一句话：市场不再为「烧钱换增长」买单了。谷歌、特斯拉 Q2 财报营收都超预期，但自由现金流同步转负，盘后一个跌 4%~7%、一个跌 5%~14%，特斯拉单周累跌近 20%、收 313.03 美元，创 2022 年以来最大单周跌幅。 ● 特斯拉：营收 282 亿（+26%）、交付创新高，但利润暴跌 57%、毛利率 16.8%、自由现金流 -10.9 亿（两年首负），资本开支 57.89 亿（+142%），马斯克全押 Optimus/Robotaxi。 ● 谷歌 Alphabet：营收 1198 亿（+24%），云 248 亿（+82%），但自由现金流上市以来首次转负 -59 亿；资本开支 449 亿（同比翻倍），全年指引上调到 1950–2050 亿，还发债 203 亿、增发 496 亿股票。 ● SpaceX 收于 115.07 美元、为上月 IPO📊 $WLD Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $9,273.15
· 4 hours: $61,600
· 12 hours: $303,000
· 24 hours: $1,067,700
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $9,273.15 $0 100%
4h $45,000 $16,600 73.1%
12h $112,000 $191,000 37.0%
24h $851,100 $216,600 79.7%
Duokong interpretation
In the first 4 hours, long liquidations dominated (73.1%~100%), with prices continuing to fall; However, 12-hour short positions at $191,000 strongly overtook (accounting for 63.0%), triggering a fierce short squeeze; Within 24 hours, long positions were liquidated at $851,100, reversing again (79.7%), marking a second reversal in direction, with the long selling trend fully returning and escalating fiercely. Ultimate winner: Bears—showing a pattern of "decline→ squeeze short → stronger decline," with bulls and traders suffering devastating liquidation.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.87% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 5.77% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 28.38% of 24 hours
Liquidation distribution is extremely post-apocalyptic: the first 12 hours accounted for only 28.38%, while the total 24-hour volume is 3.52 times that of the 12-hour period, indicating that the long sell-off market surged sharply between 12 and 24 hours (about $764,700 in the last 12 hours, accounting for 71.6% of the whole day). Currently, the market is in a phase of sustained sharp declines dominated by bears, with bulls being systematically crushed. In the short term, attention should be paid to technical recovery signals after oversold conditions.
A one-sentence explanation
$WLD 24-hour long liquidation at $851,100, accounting for 79.7% of the total, with a sharp reversal in direction, with the bears ultimately prevailing, and the bullish trend intensified in the latter half.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 布油一夜跌超5%，美股期货集体反弹，$ETH 更是涨到1944美元——中东局势暂时降温，市场终于敢喘口气了。 上周五美股依旧分化：道指涨0.5%，标普基本收平，纳指跌0.6%；全周纳指累计下跌2.1%。AI高投入、油价和4.69%的10年期美债收益率，仍在压制科技股估值。 今早风向突然反转。美伊恢复接触并暂停进一步攻击，布油从上周突破100美元回落至87美元附近；纳指100期货涨约1.2%，日经225开盘上涨0.4%。资金正在交易地缘风险降温，但谈判尚未落地，这波修复随时可能被新消息打断。 加密市场表现更强：$BTC 约65150美元，24小时上涨1.5%；$ETH 约1944美元，上涨4.2%，ETH/BTC升至0.02985。虽然上周五BTC、ETH现货ETF分别净流出2.40亿和7070万美元，但币价没有继续下杀，说明周末抛压被现货资金接住了。 今天先看ETH能否站稳1935美元并冲击2000美元，BTC则要突破65500美元才能打开空间。本周美联储会议和苹果、微软、$META 、亚马逊财报密集，油价退潮只是第一关，利率与AI资本开支才是后面的硬仗。 风险提示：地缘谈判仍有反复，$BTC BTC 🔥 **$65,170**，今早刚破了$65,000，日内涨了**+1.5%**，跟着宏观情绪走
📊 技术面说实话不太好看——**死亡交叉**已经形成，短期均线下穿长期均线，这是经典看空信号。恐惧贪婪指数掉到**28**，本月最低。但RSI在62不算过热，MACD在零轴附近压缩，典型的"等方向"状态。
🛡️ 关键位：$63,800是分析师共识的生命线——Ali Charts说守住这里能弹到$67,000，破了直接看$60,000。$62,000是更强的支撑，$68,000是上方阻力。
💸 ETF这边——上周净流入只有**$3,380万**，是回正后最弱的一周。前三天进了$4.99亿，周四周五两天跑了**$4.65亿**，几乎把一周的饭全吐了。BlackRock的IBIT一周净流出**$9,550万**。2026年累计BTC ETF净流出**$52.3亿**。与此同时ETH ETF已经连续两周跑赢BTC，7月ETH ETF进了$3.38亿 vs BTC $2.34亿。机构在悄悄换仓，不是全面看多。[来源：Cryptopolitan](https://www.cryptopolitan.com/bitcoin-etf-volume-lowest-since-2024/)
🌍 宏观这边——**明天7/28-29美联储会议**，这是本周最大变量。油价两天暴跌**6.3%**，特朗普叫停了对伊朗的空袭，美伊停火概率75%。同时黄金冲到$4,100/oz，美债收益率在降。整个风险资产在定价"战争降温+美联储可能偏鸽"。
⚠️ 但别太乐观——战争是暂停不是结束，霍尔木兹海峡还没通，胡塞武装还在打。而且油价暴跌本身也说明市场在定价经济衰退预期，不是单纯的好消息。
🎯 总结：BTC现在$63,800-$68,000这个箱体里，没方向。明天FOMC是催化剂——鸽派信号能推过$68,000看$72,000；鹰派直接破$63,800看$60,000。ETF数据说明机构目前没信仰，ETH比BTC更受宠。短期不追，等FOMC给方向，$62,000-63,800是抄底观察区，$68,000放量突破再跟。According to 3 trillion, Changxin is indeed not expensive, with a PE of only 25 and a circulating market value of 200 billion.
If you compare it with tech stocks in the A-share market, most of them are more expensive than this.
Moreover, the unlocking period for this is super long, so it has a low circulating market value for a long time.
However, the opening chips of this are too scattered, with too many retail investors winning new shares. Scattered chips create a demand for short-term shakeouts.
Compared to SpaceX, it's not expensive. The trading volume of US stocks is about 2.5-3 times that of A-shares, and A-shares have more retail investors with more emotional volatility. SpaceX has already been driven up.
But SpaceX's opening chips are largely institutional.
Comparing with SMIC, with an opening circulating market value of 100 billion and a PE over 100, it's also not expensive. SMIC had a small rise a few days after opening, then kept falling.📊 $OKB 爆仓速览
爆仓规模
· 1小时：$99.91
· 4小时：$2,872.17
· 12小时：$2,872.17
· 24小时：$3,030.23
多空分布
周期 多头爆仓 空头爆仓 多头占比
1h $0 $99.91 0%
4h $2,772.26 $99.91 96.5%
12h $2,772.26 $99.91 96.5%
24h $2,772.26 $257.97 91.5%
多空解读
1小时空头爆仓$99.91、多头为0，但规模极小可忽略；4小时起多头爆仓骤然碾压空头（占96.5%），方向剧烈逆转，转为持续单边下跌；12小时和24小时多头占比仍高达91.5%~96.5%，空方几无阻力。最终胜出方：空头——价格呈单边持续下行，多头连续止损出清。
时间分布
· 1小时占24小时的 3.3%
· 4小时占24小时的 94.8%
· 12小时占24小时的 94.8%
爆仓极端集中于4-12小时周期（合计约95%），说明主跌浪在4小时内集中爆发并基本完成；24小时总量与12小时仅增$158.06，后12小时增量极为有限。当前处于空头主导的持续下跌尾声，多头力量已基本出清，短期需等待量能萎缩信号。
一句话解读
$OKB 24小时多头爆仓$2,772.26占总量91.5%，4小时集中爆发主跌浪，空头完胜。
🔥 市场风向标 | 7月24日
今日三条热点，指向同一主题：AI的代价、监管的搁浅，以及地缘悬崖边的喘息。
📊 谷歌与特斯拉：AI盛宴的“账单”来了
两份财报揭开了AI叙事的残酷真相。
谷歌超预期但代价沉重：总营收1198亿美元，同比增长24%；谷歌云收入247.7亿美元，同比暴涨82%。然而，资本开支高达449亿美元，自由现金流首次转负至-59亿美元。盘后一度跌近5%。
特斯拉增收不增利：营收282.4亿美元，同比增长26%；但营业利润仅3.98亿美元，同比暴跌57%，运营利润率只剩1.4%。自由现金流两年多来首次转负。盘后跌超4%。
信号：谷歌的AI已在云业务中形成收入闭环；而特斯拉的Robotaxi和Optimus仍停留在“故事”阶段。市场正在惩罚只有概念、没有现金流的AI叙事。
📜 CLARITY法案搁浅：14亿美元的伦理困局
加密行业的监管希望正在消散。参议院共和党虽释放更新文本并加入道德条款，但7名民主党参议员集体否决。参议院多数党领袖图恩明确表示，法案大概率无法在8月7日休会前通过。
根本障碍：特朗普通过加密业务获得的约14亿美元收益成为最大阻力。民主党要求更严格的伦理条款，防止总统在其政府监管下继续从加密行业获利。
Polymarket预测市场显示，年内通过概率已从80%以上骤降至37%。错过8月窗口，拖入秋季选举，2026年通过可能性将大幅下降。
🚢 美军暂停空袭：地缘悬崖边的喘息
当地时间7月25日，特朗普下令美军当天不要对伊朗发动新空袭，结束了此前连续13天的每日打击行动。
暂停空袭前数小时，阿曼代表团已抵达德黑兰，就重启霍尔木兹海峡通航展开谈判，据称已取得进展。布伦特原油此前已突破100美元/桶，若谈判取得突破，油价有望回落。
信号：这是一次战术性暂停——为外交留空间，但美军恢复打击的预案仍在准备中。
💎 总结
三件事勾勒出当下市场的核心矛盾：AI的账单正在到来——谷歌和特斯拉用史上首次负现金流告诉市场，AI烧得比想象中更快；监管的窗口正在关闭——14亿美元的伦理困局让CLARITY法案年内通过希望渺茫；而地缘的喘息能持续多久，取决于阿曼斡旋的成败。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 今天盘面终于有点活气了。
大饼65,300，涨了差不多1个点，凌晨那波直接突破了65,000，最高怼到65,500附近。二饼这次是真硬气，从1,830一口气拉到1,950上方，涨了4个多点，总算没白当一回“老二”。
说白了就一个事：中东那边暂时停火了。
特朗普说暂停打击伊朗，伊朗那边也顺着台阶下，说美国停手我也停。打了这么多天，两边都累了。消息出来原油直接闪崩5%，美股期货、黄金全线上涨，大饼二饼跟着喝口汤。
但别高兴太早，有几个疙瘩得心里有数：
第一，ETF还在跑。周四周五两天比特币ETF净流出了4.65亿，贝莱德周五一天就丢了2个多亿。机构没回来，这波就是情绪驱动的反弹，不是真金白银在买。
第二，这周事儿太密了。周三美联储开会，加息概率35%，虽然不是大概率，但比上周的12%可是翻了好几倍。周四还有个物价数据要出。参议院那边还要推法案投票。任何一个出点意外，今天这点涨幅都不够吐的。
第三，恐惧贪婪指数39，还在恐惧区晃悠。散户没跟，情绪没起来，说明这波反弹没人信。
技术面上，大饼上面65,500-66,500全是等着解套的，下面64,000-64,200是底线。二饼短期压力在1,870-1,900，前期高点1,956是一道坎。
所以今天涨了是好事，但别太当回事。 65,000回来了，关键是能不能站住。有仓位的看住65,000别破，破了就回到老路。空仓的不急这一下，等周三美联储那把刀落地再说。这位置进去，赌的成分比投资的成分大。$BTC $ETH $CORE is currently fluctuating around 0.018, seemingly consolidating sideways, but actually hiding dangers. The team and treasury hold a combined 700 million zero-cost tokens unlocking linearly on a monthly basis, quantitative programs apply layered pressure on the order book around the clock, and the staking mechanism only locks retail circulating supply. These three fundamental logics determine a long-term downward trend in the coin price. The Fed's expected rate cut in September may trigger a pulse rebound, but once the positive news is priced in, the market will quickly cool down. The peak is unlikely to hold above 0.021, followed by accelerated decline. From October to November, as $BTC's market diverges and funds flow back to mainstream assets, $CORE's support levels will be successively broken, with 0.013 and 0.009 potentially becoming casualties of the bulls vs. bears battle. By December year-end, liquidity will dry up, and the annual low will most likely appear near 0.0078, nearly halving from the current price. This downturn is not a short-term negative but a multi-year chip clearing process. The daily rewards from staking are actually inflation dilution; the more you lock, the faster your total assets shrink. Those out of position should not try to catch the bottom at any point; without clear bottom signals, bottom fishing is just taking the bag. Deeply trapped holders can only wait for the September rate cut rebound to the 0.020-0.021 range to gradually reduce positions. Do not expect a trend reversal, and do not add positions to average down. Short-term traders should only take short positions to play the slow decline; the tolerance for long positions is extremely low. The current price is very likely just a downward consolidation; the market is trading time for space, but the space gained is not upward but a lower price.Wooden Sister won't follow in for now. Let's break down the logic and look at $CL $BTC $ETH. This time, oil prices broke 100. On the surface, it looks like Red Sea oil tankers were attacked, US-Iran conflict spilled over, and navigation in the Strait of Hormuz dropped to zero. But beneath the surface, two layers of things are pushing forward. The first layer is supply and demand. When the Middle East situation becomes tense, premiums hit the market. Meanwhile, some regions' economic recovery still demands oil. Supply is tight, demand remains, so prices naturally climb. The second layer is inflation transmission. Crude oil is the mother of industry. When prices rise, transportation costs catch up first, chemical costs follow, and finally the consumption side Price pressures are all on the way, and central banks' rate cut plans around the world must be postponed. This is not good news for risk assets, but the market itself has its own adjustment mechanisms. If oil prices are too high, unnecessary travel demand will be suppressed. At the same time, non-OPEC oil-producing countries, seeing high profits, will accelerate capacity expansion, boosting the pace of new energy substitution. In the medium term, the market has the ability to balance itself, though this balancing process will be somewhat painful. Short-term oil price fluctuations do test the quality of global economic recovery, but macroeconomic resilience and energy structure transformation—these long-term variables are equally crucial Don't be led by price. Understanding the transmission chain is far more important than guessing the top. #EarningsReportObserver: Who can understand the real answers from Google and Tesla this time? #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress Changxin Technology will be listed on Monday. What market value is reasonable to buy in at?
Here is the conclusion first:
Based on Changxin's profits and the P/E ratios of the world's top three memory companies, Changxin's reasonable valuation is between ¥1.7 trillion and ¥2.1 trillion.
Considering the scarcity of domestic DRAM leaders, the market may assign a premium valuation ranging from ¥2.1 trillion to ¥3 trillion.
Additionally, factoring in the low 6.73% circulating share ratio and the market sentiment driven by South Korea's recently announced $950 billion semiconductor cooperation, there is a possibility of an intraday surge to ¥3 trillion to ¥4 trillion.
1. How much is Changxin worth based on profits and peer P/E ratios?
As of the close on July 24, the data for the world's top three memory companies are roughly:
Samsung Electronics: market value about ¥7.35 trillion, profit in the last 12 months about ¥386.7 billion, P/E ratio about 20x;
SK Hynix: market value about ¥5.95 trillion, profit in the last 12 months about ¥348.7 billion, P/E ratio about 17x;
Micron: market value about ¥7.04 trillion, profit in the last 12 months about ¥341.8 billion, P/E ratio about 21x.
Using Changxin's estimated net profit of ¥100 billion in 2026 as a baseline:
A market value of ¥2.1 trillion corresponds to a 21x P/E ratio;
A market value of ¥3 trillion corresponds to a 30x P/E ratio;
A market value of ¥4 trillion corresponds to a 40x P/E ratio.
Therefore, Changxin reaching ¥2.1 trillion would have a valuation roughly close to international peers.
Changxin is inferior to the top three in scale, technology, and customers, but it is the only A-share company capable of large-scale DRAM production, so the market may grant some domestic substitution and scarcity premium.
Note that the three international companies use profits from the last 12 months, while Changxin uses estimated profits for 2026. This data set is mainly for observing valuation positioning and should not be considered a completely identical comparison.
2. Why might South Korea's $950 billion cooperation push up Changxin's valuation?
On July 24, South Korea announced that Samsung and SK Group will collaborate with Broadcom, Nvidia, and others on about $950 billion in semiconductor cooperation over the next five years.
The cooperation involves HBM, advanced memory, and AI data centers, which will further strengthen market expectations for demand and industry prosperity in memory chips.
This news was released before Changxin's listing, potentially increasing capital attention on the memory sector and driving the market to assign a higher sentiment valuation to Changxin.
3. Why might Changxin surge to ¥3 trillion or even ¥4 trillion on the first day?
Based on profits and peer valuations, Changxin's reasonable market value is about ¥1.7 trillion to ¥2.1 trillion. But the first-day price will also be affected by the number of circulating shares.
After issuance, Changxin has a total of 66.881 billion shares, with only 4.503 billion shares tradable on the first day, about 6.73% of total shares.
If selling pressure is low and buying funds are concentrated, the stock price could be rapidly pushed up in a short time. The total market value is calculated by multiplying the current stock price by all 66.881 billion shares, so an extreme market value far exceeding reasonable valuation may appear.
If the total market value reaches ¥3 trillion, the stock price needs to rise to ¥44.86, about 418% above the issue price, corresponding to a circulating market value of about ¥202 billion.
If the total market value reaches ¥4 trillion, the stock price needs to rise to ¥59.81, about 591% above the issue price, corresponding to a circulating market value of about ¥269.3 billion.
The STAR Market new stocks have no price limit for the first five trading days. Combined with the low 6.73% circulation ratio, an intraday surge to ¥3 trillion to ¥4 trillion is possible.
However, ¥4 trillion corresponds to a 40x P/E ratio, requiring low circulation, strong sentiment, and large capital support simultaneously.
Final conclusion:
Changxin's valuation near ¥2 trillion is fundamentally reasonable; ¥3 trillion requires domestic substitution and scarcity premium; an intraday surge to ¥4 trillion mainly depends on low circulation, strong sentiment, and capital driving.
#A股#ChangxinTechnology#Memory#SamsungElectronics#SKHynix#mu#交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard
A community that survived in a highly leveraged market, I want to share some experiences with everyone.
The futures market is a negative-and-game game. Fees, funding rates, slippage, pin insertion—each item continuously drains participants' money. In such a market, long-term survival itself is a form of excess return.
So the most important thing is how to survive long enough in this market, so long that your cognitive advantage has the chance to turn into profit.
1. Leverage amplifies not returns, but variance
The biggest misunderstanding many beginners have about leverage is that it is understood as a "return amplifier." Wrong. Leverage amplifies variance—it magnifies both your right and wrong positions, and through liquidation mechanisms, you are directly eliminated from the "temporary mistake," unable to wait for the "final right."
If you set the right leverage for a position in one direction and set the leverage too high, a single insertion can sweep you out of the market, and then the price moves in the direction you predicted throughout the entire process. Correct direction but loss is the most common dead end in the futures market, bar none.
When effective leverage exceeds 3x, you should ask yourself: Is this trade worth the risk of liquidation?
2. The width of your stop-loss is determined by market fluctuations, not by your sense of pain
Most persona stop-loss logics are: "I can afford to lose X at most, so I set my stop-loss where I lost X." "This is measuring the market by the thickness of your own wallet; the market won't cooperate with you.
The correct order is reversed:
1. First, look at the current volatility of the instrument (for example, ATR, average true volatility);
2. Stop loss must be placed at the point where the trend has failed, and the width should be no less than 1 times ATR—otherwise, you're not stopping losses, you're just giving money to the insertion;
3. Use the "stop-loss width" to calculate the position size: a wide stop-loss means a smaller position; A narrow stop-loss allows for large positions.
Wide stop-loss + small position is better long-term than narrow stop-loss + large position. The former loses manageable small amounts, while the latter is repeatedly ripped down by market noise—each time swept away at the worst possible level, and then watched the price reverse.
There is also an iron rule: high conviction is not a reason to withdraw from stop-losses. There is no logical connection between "I'm sure it will fall below X" and "So I don't set stop-losses." The former is a viewpoint, the latter is an all-in account for a viewpoint. Opinions can be strong, but positions must be left with a fallback route.
3. Cost structure: Your competitors are not just the market, but also the bill
Contract trading involves three layers of hidden costs, and most people have never fully calculated them:
Funding rate: When the rate is positive, the long side pays the short position; when the rate is negative, the opposite is reversed. It doesn't sound like much, but in extreme market conditions, rates can reach 0.5% or even higher per day—holding the same position for a month can eat up to 15% just from the rates. Before doing arbitrage or long-term trades, you must use the historical settled rates to calculate costs. Don't use the "forecast rates" shown by the exchange, as those are estimates and can be deceiving. Conversely, if you short a stock with a very high fee, the rate is essentially handing you money—for the same short trade, you open the exchange with the highest fee, and the difference over the course of a year is huge.
Slippage and liquidity: Small coins and newly launched contract markets are extremely thin, and the real cost of moving in and out of market orders far exceeds the fees. For products with insufficient depth, the insertion is both frequent and deep, and your stop-loss order may be far below the trigger price.
Fees: For frequent inbound and out-of-the-money travelers, monthly fees often exceed the absolute value of net profit. If you find yourself "always in the right direction and your account isn't rising," first check the fee bill—the answer is usually there.
4. Frequent entry and exit is like a shredder that turns profits into losses
The most common mistake in a consolidation range is repeatedly entering and exiting, each time a little bit is swept away by the small needle, and by the end of the day, all the direction judgments are correct, but the account shrinks. This is called wear.
There is only one solution: reduce frequency and improve the quality of each transaction. One entry, wide stop-loss, hold on. If the range isn't broken, don't move; if it does, accept it. Every time you enter and exit, you pay one more fee, risk being scanned by needles, and lose control of your emotions one more time.
Ask yourself a question: In the past three months, were the ten most profitable deals you made from frequent short-term trading, or were they made with low-frequency large-scale strategies? The vast majority of people answer the latter. Profits are concentrated in a few patient orders, while losses are spread across countless orders that are eager to get hands on.
5. Don't Marry Old Views: The Fulfillment and Falsification of Thesis
Behind every large position, there should be a thesis (core logic): what event or expectation are you betting on? The key to managing this position is to keep asking: How far have I paid out on what I bet?
· Expectations fulfilled: Even if the direction is still moving, it's time to stop. The market has priced in your logic; the remaining volatility has nothing to do with your thesis—you're just running naked.
· Expectations disproven: Cut immediately, don't bargain with your position. Cutting positions is not shameful; "I was wrong" is the most expensive and valuable phrase in this market.
· Expectation reversal: The most advanced move is to cut old positions and reverse to new ones—but only if you truly recognize the new logic, not gamblers who double their losses triggered by losses.
After cashing out old thesis, following the same logic is a common source of chronic losses. Every new order should be accompanied by a fresh reason.
(This post is for trading experience sharing and does not constitute any investment advice.) Contract trading is extremely risky, so be sure to invest your money you can afford to lose. ）预期落空！多数党领袖表态，CLARITY法案很难赶在休会前落地
美国加密圈万众期待的CLARITY清晰法案，传来不及预期的信号。参议院多数党领袖公开表态，这份行业期盼已久的加密监管法案，大概率无法在8月夏季休会之前完成最终通过。
这份法案是美国近几年最重要的加密立法，如果落地，将会厘清SEC与CFTC的监管边界，给BTC、ETH这类资产明确的监管定位，给整个行业带来一套联邦层面的监管框架，也是机构资金敢于大规模进场的重要先决条件。此前市场普遍把8月7日视作关键截止时间点，如果错过这个窗口，今年法案落地的概率会大打折扣。
现在两党之间依旧存在不小分歧，新增的公职人员加密道德条款、消费者保护、稳定币相关细则都是拉扯的焦点，民主党方面认为现有草案还有不少地方需要修改完善，暂时拿不到足够的支持票数推动全院表决。当然事情也没有完全锁死，领导层的折中想法，是争取在休会前至少启动法案的审议流程，把程序先走通，为9月复会之后继续博弈保留一丝可能性。但9月之后国会要面对大量优先级更高的法案，再叠加选举周期的干扰，推进难度会直线上升。
聊下这件事对盘面的实际影响。之前市场已经部分计价了法案落地的乐观预期，消息出来之后，直接打碎了短期快速立法的幻想。短期来看，利好兑现落空，会压制风险资产的情绪，意味着美国加密监管的“明朗时刻”还要继续往后延期。
但我们也不用过度悲观，法案没有彻底死亡，只是时间往后拖。市场叙事会从“马上出规则”切换成长期拉锯博弈。对交易者来说，意味着短期少了一个强催化，很难指望靠这条消息走出大级别单边行情。后续重点要跟踪两件事，休会前能不能走完审议程序，9月复会后两党能不能达成妥协。
政策的变数永远是加密市场最大的变量之一，利好落空不等于彻底利空，只是把行情的时间周期拉长，操作上不要把赌注全部押在法案短期通过这件事上。
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 On the morning of July 27, the market finally stopped focusing solely on BTC. BTC: $65,168.45, 24H +1.50% ETH: $1,947.19, 24H +4.20% SOL: $76.51, 24H +3.00% The most notable point today is not that all three coins rose, but that ETH surged back above $1,900, with gains clearly outperforming BTC. SOL also reclaimed $76, indicating that high Beta risk appetite is warming up. The Fear and Greed Index rose from 26 to 30, showing that sentiment is finally catching up a bit. However, funding rates have also started to rise, with ETH and SOL approaching 0.01%. Although still far from truly crowded, it is no longer the almost directionless state seen yesterday. Today's core judgment: this is an effective recovery after a weak pullback, but not yet a trend reversal. ETH reclaiming $1,900 is the first confirmation; whether BTC can hold above 65.5K and SOL can maintain $76 will determine if the rebound has a second leg. 1) BTC: Above 65K, finally starting to make up lost ground BTC is at $65,168.45, up 1.50% in 24H, with a trading volume of about $14.96B and a market cap of about $1.307T. The 24H range is approximately $64,243-$65,489. BTC continued to rebound from around 64.3K the previous day, reclaiming above $65,000. This move is more meaningful than the weekend bottoming on July 26 because the price has returned to the key recovery zone of the previous pullback.今天全球市场的风险偏好明显回暖，但目前更像是地缘风险降温带来的修复，还不能直接确认新一轮上涨已经启动。 美伊暂停相互攻击后，国际油价大幅回落，美股期指和BTC同步反弹。不过，胡塞武装仍在袭击沙特能源设施，中东局势并未彻底结束。本周美联储决议、美国经济数据和大型科技公司财报，将决定这轮反弹能否延续。 一、隔夜发生了什么？ 1. 美伊暂停相互攻击，风险资产率先反弹 事实： 美国暂时停止对伊朗的军事打击，为双方恢复谈判留下空间。受此影响，截至周日晚间，道指期货上涨约0.5%—0.6%，标普500期货上涨约0.6%—0.7%，纳斯达克100期货上涨约1.2%。BTC重新站上65,000美元。 截至北京时间今早，BTC约报65,295美元，日内高点约65,469美元，低点约64,236美元，较前一交易时段上涨约1.5%。 市场反应： 科技股期货涨幅明显领先道指期货，说明地缘风险降温后，资金优先回流此前跌幅较大的高估值成长板块。 背后逻辑： 军事冲突暂缓 → 能源供应中断风险下降 → 油价与通胀预期回落 → 利率继续上升的压力减轻 → 科技股和BTC获得修复空间 但需要注意，当前只是暂停交火，并不$XAU
1）趋势位置
月低附近反弹后，在 4000–4150 一带横盘，上方 200 周期均线附近多次受阻。
一句话：高位回落后的震荡整理，不是单边趋势。
2）市场含义
避险+利率敏感。看美元、美债实际利率。
风险偏好回升时黄金常钝；避险升温才容易加速。
转强三步：
① 站稳 4000
② 过 4150–4160
③ 站上 4200 并站稳
现在停在①，②反复试、没过干净。
3）关键位为什么关键
• 4000–4020：心理+结构支撑。守住=多头底仓还在；跌破 3975=下看 3950 甚至更深。
• 4080–4150 / ~4158：最近最密压力。突破站稳=修复升级；冲高回落=继续区间。
4）今日操作思路
• 方向：区间思路，不做单边信仰
• 多：回踩 4000–4025 企稳做多
• 空：冲 4120–4150 明显滞涨可轻空
• 止损：多 3970；空 4170
• 目标：多看 4080–4120；空看 4020–4000
• 仓位：1 成内
能做波段，不能当趋势单重仓。以上为技术面个人观点，不构成投资建议，仓位控制第一。$CORE CoreDAO项目方持续抛售代币六大核心底层原因
一、筹码零成本，抛售纯无风险套利（根本动因）
1. 团队份额3.15亿枚（总量15%），创世阶段无任何资金成本，仅锁定1年后分36个月线性解锁，2026年处于集中释放中段，每月固定千万枚零成本筹码自动划入项目方可控钱包，解锁后唯一目的就是变现落袋为安。
2. 国库1.995亿枚、储备基金2.1亿枚创世即解锁，全部由基金会单方面掌控，无需DAO投票划转；官方已将国库大额CORE抵押借贷稳定币，抵押只是过渡形式，最终仍会分批抛售偿还债务、提取现金流。
3. 合计7亿枚可控筹码，远高于散户自由流通盘，只要市场存在承接资金，就会持续分批派发，不存在惜售托币动机。
二、生态无造血能力，全靠抛售代币覆盖运营开支
1. 主打产品SatPay、BTCFi价值飞轮持续跳票，截至2026年7月无规模化商用场景、无稳定手续费营收，白皮书承诺的“生态回购”全程无链上大额买单佐证，项目没有自主现金流来源。
2. 团队薪资、KOL水军投放、海外公关会议（香港Web3峰会）、节点补贴、交易所做市费用全部依靠变卖CORE维持；一旦停止抛售，整个项目的营销与运营体系会直接断流。
3. 原Gas销毁机制被官方逐步取消，区块手续费不再销毁代币，全部流入基金会运营池，进一步放大流通供给，加剧抛售需求。
三、温水阴跌式出货，是最优变现策略，规避崩盘风险
1. 暴力大单砸盘会直接击穿市场流动性，变成无量崩盘，海量筹码彻底卖不出去；匀速分层抛售、用量化拆分等额卖单缓慢阴跌，能长期维持基础流动性，拉长数年出货周期。
2. 每次释放生态利好（SatPay对接、机构节点合作）制造小幅脉冲反弹，专门吸引抄底散户承接解锁筹码，反弹窗口就是集中抛售窗口期，利好本质是出货配套公关手段。
3. B14G、节点质押机制刻意引导散户买入锁仓，减少散户止损抛压，二级市场只剩项目方单向卖出，供需失衡最大化承接效率。
四、中心化治理，无托币意愿，DAO只是包装概念
1. 名义去中心化DAO，实则国库调配、做市量化策略、代币解锁节奏全部由核心团队单方面决策，社区投票无法干预大额筹码处置。
2. 项目方没有长期经营代币的诉求：BTCFi赛道竞品Stacks、Babylon持续分流机构资金，CORE无独家技术壁垒，团队预判长期估值下行，选择趁尚有流动性提前套现离场，避免后期币价归零筹码彻底作废。
3. 无长期市值管理规划，从未投入自有资金回购托底，所有叙事只为稳住场内套牢盘，防止集体割肉导致出货通道断裂。
五、宏观与赛道资金退潮，提前变现规避贬值风险
1. 市场热点持续切换至Meme板块，BTCFi赛道增量资金断层，场外游资集体规避筹码高度集中的VC山寨币，后续接盘人群只会持续缩减，越早抛售变现汇率越高。
2. 全球加密监管趋严，针对代币解锁套现、程序化市场操纵的核查收紧；项目方选择分批缓慢出货，规避一次性大额抛售带来的监管追责风险，降低量化操纵的定性证据。
3. 即便美联储降息带来大盘宽松，也只是短期脉冲行情，团队会抓住流动性高峰加大抛售力度，不会持有等待趋势反转。
六、水军与叙事策略调整，不需要拉新，只需要持续消化存量筹码
1. 此前喊梭哈、重仓的吹子托集体失声，核心原因是场内散户全部深度套牢，已经没有增量新韭菜，无需再花钱造势拉盘；现阶段只需要持续抛售存量解锁筹码，少量公关公告维稳场内持仓者即可。
2. 场外资金避雷共识成型，造势拉新性价比归零，营销预算收缩，资源全部倾斜于出货配套的温和叙事，而非拉盘炒作。
⚠️风险提示：虚拟货币交易炒作在我国属于非法金融活动，内容仅客观拆解代币经济与操盘逻辑，不构成任何投资交易建议垃圾债已经出现破位信号，值得高度警惕
垃圾债市场正在走弱，这个信号一定要重点留意。
当前市场当中，创出新低的债券数量已经远超创出新高的品种。涨跌腾落线（涨跌线）即将跌至一年以来的低位。
历史经验表明，高收益垃圾债往往是股市十分有效的先行预警指标，尤其在股指处于高位区间的时候，信贷市场的异动经常会提前反映后续权益市场的变化。
⚠️仅为市场信号观察，不构成任何投资建议。 It's quite interesting to look at Google's and Tesla's earnings reports together this time. On the surface, both companies are talking about AI, autonomous driving, and next-generation products; but when you look at cash flow, investment pace, and profit quality, the stories are not the same.
Let's start with Google. Alphabet's Q2 revenue was $119.8 billion, up 24% year-over-year. The cloud business continues to grow rapidly, indicating that AI demand has started to convert into orders. Search advertising hasn't suddenly collapsed either; AI summaries and AI modes currently seem more like changing the entry point rather than immediately replacing search. However, the high proportion of investment income in net profit cannot simply be taken as the core business earning that much more. The real question Google needs to answer is whether the computing power and data center budgets invested over the next few years can be returned with higher cloud revenue, more stable advertising efficiency, and new subscription income.
Tesla, on the other hand, looks like a different kind of exam paper. Deliveries exceeded 480,000 vehicles in Q2, with revenue around $28 billion, but AI infrastructure, robotics, autonomous driving, and new factories are advancing simultaneously, capital expenditures are rising, and free cash flow is under pressure. The most attractive aspect is how it presents itself as a software, energy, and robotics company rather than just an automaker; the most hesitating part is that these long-term stories require spending money today, making it difficult for the short-term profit statement to vouch for the future.
From these two earnings reports, what I care about most is not the after-hours price movement, but whether management has fully explained the "investment—product—revenue—cash flow" chain. Google has advertising and cloud businesses as a safety net, allowing more room for trial and error; Tesla has greater imagination but must face the reality of simultaneous changes in car prices, delivery pace, and R&D investment. One is betting on the future with strong cash flow, the other is seeking cash flow within future narratives. Whether the valuation can hold ultimately comes back to investment output, not slogans.
This is also worth noting: as U.S. stock giants continuously push budgets toward AI, computing power, and automation, market risk appetite becomes more sensitive, and liquidity assets in the digital asset market often reflect this sentiment first. Treating earnings reports as report cards is not enough; what’s truly useful is to see clearly behind the scores where the money is coming from and where it is planned to be spent.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Digital asset prices are highly volatile; please make independent judgments and pay attention to risks.#Gate.io版临时工
Gate官方持续声称对接我们ALD社区的Robin是冒充人员、骗子，这里有几个无法回避的核心疑问，请正面答复：
1. 如果Robin仅仅是外部骗子、并非Gate工作人员，一名不受官方授权的冒充者，凭什么拥有权限完成Gate Alpha完整上币流程，成功将ALD代币上线平台？
Gate上币具备内部多层审批机制，绝非外部人员可以私自操作。倘若外人随便冒充员工就能完成代币上线，是否证明Gate内部权限管理彻底失控，任何人都能冒充工作人员主导项目上币？
2. 我们按照对接人要求，足额支付上币对应的USDT与ALD。若Robin属于个人欺诈，为何骗子指引我们转账的资金最终流入Gate体系，并且代币如期上线？
普通人实施诈骗，目标是私自侵占资金；而本次资金交割完成后代币成功上架平台，完全不符合普通骗子的作案逻辑。
3. Gate不能简单用“对接人是骗子”单方面撕毁双方达成的上币约定。
代币成功上线Gate Alpha是客观既定事实，交易行为、履约结果真实发生。不能享受项目方缴纳费用带来的收益，同时以“人员冒充”为由拒绝履行全部协议义务。
4. 希望Gate公开本次ALD上线Gate Alpha完整审批链路、内部经手工作人员。
如果Robin无任何官方授权，请解释：一名外部冒充者，是如何绕过全部内部风控、审批，打通上币全流程的？ 这是否意味着Gate Alpha上币渠道存在重大漏洞，所有项目方都面临被虚假人员诱导的风险？别再天天担心纳斯达克泡沫了。
2026 年纳指新规，正在主动修复指数的结构性风险：
低流通股票限制权重，
成分股每季度审核，
超级大公司上市后快速纳入，
避免少数股票和被动资金把指数玩坏。
当然，新规不能消灭泡沫。
但它至少说明了一件事：
今天的纳斯达克，不是2000年那个只会看概念、垃圾公司都能上天的纳斯达克。
真正应该关注的，不是有没有泡沫，而是企业利润能不能追上估值。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ $BTC #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零
Ethereum validators leaving the queue to zero is quite something worth pondering.
Here are a few key figures. In September 2025, the exit queue backlog peaked at 2.67 million ETH, valued at about $11.7 billion. And now? 0. Retreat whenever you want, no one leaves. Meanwhile, the entry queue is about 2.499 million ETH, requiring 43 days to get in. With one entry and one out, the difference was over two million coins. Currently, about 40.8 million ETH have been staked across the network, accounting for 33.49% of the total supply, with 883724 active validators and an annualized staking yield of 2.64%.
The motivation for quitting is often selling for cash or lacking confidence in the internet. No one is lining up to exit, which means these stakers aren't in a rush to cash out now; they feel it's more cost-effective to take the pledge returns than to sell. Some people are lining up to enter, which means there are nearly 2.5 million ETH outside wanting to be locked up. A network no one wants to enter, and a threshold that many people want to enter—this signal is more direct than any candlestick chart.
And there's a bigger background to this—Ethereum ETFs had accumulated net inflows of $10.48 billion by mid-July. Institutions are buying ETFs, major players are staking, and both forces are simultaneously draining liquidity. Wallet addresses are decreasing, and tradable ETH is decreasing.
A few days ago, Vitalik also proposed an "extreme streamlined chain," aiming to compress each validator's state to about 6 bytes and replace cyclical updates with ZK proofs, aiming to scale validators to the millions. It seems the team itself is preparing for a larger lock-up.
The staking yield is 2.64%, which isn't high, but combined with ETH's expected appreciation, it is indeed attractive for long-term capital. These people aren't quitting not because they don't want to sell, but because they feel now is not the time to sell.🚢 A loud explosion in the Strait of Hormuz, an oil tanker blew up, instantly triggering a surge in market risk aversion. Iran verbally says it will stop retaliating, Trump canceled strikes two nights in a row, this "two-person show" between the US and Iran keeps dragging on, pure torment.
📊 The inflation ghost story returns: US Treasury yields soar wildly, the dollar strengthens, and rate cut expectations are repeatedly suppressed. $BTC's rebound is firmly suppressed by four major obstacles—dollar, US Treasuries, rate cut outlook, and geopolitical risks. Bulls want to break through? Difficult.
🔍 TRUMP's team just transferred 13.8 million tokens into a CEX; could this be a sign of selling pressure? No conclusion yet. On the other side, Saylor openly hints at buying more next week, signaling extreme division between bulls and bears.
⏳ At Monday's open, watch three things: oil prices first to signal, US Treasury yields follow, and Bitcoin finally gives the answer. Don't guess, wait for the market to speak.
#Iran #TRUMP #Hormuz #Bitcoin 我们没有负责人，现在我需要知晓以下问题，我只在Gate官方app进行联系，请管理层落实以下问题，请看清楚字，别用话术敷衍，Gate的意思是：我们按照合同约定付的100000usdt和800,000 ALD到了“骗子”钱包的同时，恰巧Gate的alpha自动抓取了ALD代币，然后不能公开谁对接上币对接流程，最后骗子的钱包转进了Gate alpha进行空投，是这样的吗？
哈希在这里：
0x8dccbab785a7f4213d26925519809ff5f51e57e2342ed9ea35431f988271ea90
当一个项目付了钱、上了币、然后被告知“跟你沟通的人不是我们的人，并且项目登陆Gate”——这是Gate的回答对吗？A new week of major events is intensively arriving, with multiple key data points and earnings reports set to define the direction of risk assets
The brand-new trading week has already begun, with various catalytic events clustering together, making the market set for a very lively week.
On the geopolitical front, both the US and Iran have chosen mutual restraint, with the conflict cooling down temporarily and the possibility of restarting negotiations reemerging. Driven by the easing of risk-off sentiment, Brent crude oil prices have fallen below the $90 mark. In the short term, risk assets are expected to gain a breathing window.
The domestic capital market is also welcoming a major event, as the leading domestic DRAM manufacturer Hefei Changxin Technology debuts on the A-share STAR Market. This is also one of the largest IPO projects in the history of the STAR Market, with an issue price set at ¥8.66 and a listing valuation close to ¥580 billion, marking an important capital milestone for the domestic memory chip industry.
Overseas, SK Hynix will release its Q2 earnings report on Wednesday. In this AI-driven storage upcycle, this earnings report holds significant reference value, with its importance comparable to Nvidia’s earnings report, serving as a core indicator for the AI industry chain’s prosperity.
On Thursday, the US will release core PCE inflation data. If the core PCE monthly rate exceeds market expectations, it will reinforce the market’s judgment that high interest rates will persist longer, strengthening US Treasury yields and the dollar, while tech stocks, Bitcoin, and gold will face downward pressure; conversely, if inflation data falls short of expectations, the market will reprice expectations for looser liquidity, driving positive momentum for AI tech stocks and crypto assets.
The PCE reflects the reality of inflation, while the subsequent Federal Reserve FOMC interest rate decision will signal the policy response.
After US market close on July 29, Meta, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and ARM will collectively release their Q2 2026 earnings reports. Along with SK Hynix’s performance report, the revenue and capital expenditure guidance from these giants will jointly influence the direction of the global AI tech sector and major risk assets for the coming quarter.
After this week’s intensive data and earnings report barrage, the market will gain more clues to project the general pattern of risk assets in Q3 and Q4. AI is a long-term certain sector, and at this stage, the industry has not yet reached a bubble phase.
⚠️ This article is only a market event summary and does not constitute any investment advice. $BTC 昨天微策略把USDT储备拉到30亿美元
通过卖MSTR股票，套现4.67亿美元
BTC持仓84.3万枚，一枚也没卖
如果微策略看空，卖了MSTR之后应该顺带卖BTC，但是他没卖
他这应该是用低成本的股权融资来买币，而不是卖币来买币，84.3万枚是底仓，不是筹码
短期看，这30亿是"备子弹"中期看，MSTR的折价在收窄，说明市场应该在给这个模式重新定价The crypto community often discusses US stocks, macro policies, liquidity, and other topics, sometimes making them a bit dizzying.
To try to understand simply, I made a comparison chart of BTC and US M2.
Let's start with the conclusion:
Setting aside short-term fluctuations, the US M2 has generally risen over the long term, while BTC's long-term price center continues to climb.
This shows that there is indeed a certain structural relationship between BTC and the liquidity cycle.
Next, let's look at M2 YoY (year-on-year growth rate of M2 money supply):
Around 2023, liquidity contraction neared its low, then gradually recovered, and now returns to positive growth, with the latest value at about +5.6%.
My understanding:
Of course, BTC short-term predictions cannot be made based on M2 trading.
But looking at a longer timeframe, changes in the US liquidity environment may have a significant impact on the long-term pricing of BTC, a scarce digital asset.
In other words:
BTC is not just a high-volatility risk asset. From a longer perspective, its value storage logic as a scarce digital asset is indeed quite interesting. On a large cycle scale, the connection between liquidity conditions and BTC's long-term trend may be deeper than many people imagine.
(Personal amateur research, does not constitute investment advice)$BTC 今日加密要闻
1）比特币一度突破6.5万美元。伊朗局势升级推高油价和美债收益率，风险资产同步承压，宏观重新成为短线定价核心。
2）美国现货比特币ETF连续第7个交易日净流入，最新单日约6900万美元，阶段累计接近10亿美元；机构资金仍在承接，但力度尚不足以抵消宏观压力。
3）AFX与Verus运营的跨链桥数小时内接连发生安全事件，涉及约3160万美元资产；风险集中于桥的签名与密钥体系，Arbitrum原生桥未受影响。
结论：ETF资金提供边际支撑，但油价、收益率与安全风险仍占上风，短线宜控制杠杆，等待宏观波动收敛。$BTC $ETH #多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过 #黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, Endorsed by Industry Collectives On July 27, Japanese and Korean stock markets opened with forty minutes of volatility, showing a pattern of weak opening and pull-back after rallies. Overseas markets saw significant sentiment suppression from overnight drops in US tech stocks. Japan's Nikkei 225 Index opened slightly higher, rising as much as 0.86% in early trading, but has since narrowed its gain to 0.38%, showing a relatively stable trend. On the board, low-valuation weighted indices such as finance and heavy manufacturing stabilized the market, while the semiconductor equipment sector surged but then retreated. Funds realized short-term profits, with no sustained incremental capital inflow. South Korea's KOSPI opened up 1.73%. Stimulated by positive cooperation in memory chips, Samsung and SK Hynix surged sharply in early trading. However, bullish pressure quickly emerged, and the index currently rose only 0.05%, nearly flat. Korea's ChiNext KOSDAQ showed relative resilience, maintaining a 1.18% gain, with smaller and mid-cap tech stocks showing stronger support. Sector differentiation is significant, with the AI storage industry chain benefiting early and chip leaders surging but then retreating; Pro-cyclical sectors such as shipbuilding and machinery held up against the trend, while precious metals and oil & gas safe-haven stocks weakened slightly. Overall, the Asia-Pacific market lacked rebound momentum, negative sentiment from overnight tech plunges in U.S. stocks continued, and the positive news for memory chips only brought short-term pulse rallies. The weakness in Japanese and Korean tech stocks will slightly suppress the early recovery of A-share semiconductor and CPO sectors, and overall market risk aversion remains, making it difficult to break out of a one-sided rally in the short term. AI investment enters its second half, and the real winners are not those who burn the most money
As a financial report observer, I want to look at the AI industry from a perspective that's often overlooked.
Many people see Google and Tesla's financial reports and first react to revenue growth and profit changes, but what the market truly focuses on is one issue:
When will the money invested by AI turn into sustained revenue growth?
Data:
Google Alphabet
Revenue: $119.8 billion, up 24% year-over-year
Google Cloud: $24.8 billion, up 82% year-on-year
2026 capital expenditure guidance: $195 billion to $205 billion
Core changes:
AI business is driving rapid growth in cloud revenue, but massive infrastructure investments are also prompting the market to reassess the return cycle.
Tesla
Revenue: $28.2 billion, up 26% year-over-year
R&D expenses: significantly increased year-on-year
Capital expenditure continues to expand, with a focus on autonomous driving, robotics, and AI infrastructure
Core changes:
The automotive business remains a source of cash flow, but future valuations will increasingly depend on whether AI stories can be realized.
From a historical perspective, at the beginning of every technological revolution, the market goes through a phase:
The first stage is to see who invests the most.
The second stage is to see who leads in technology.
The third stage is to see who can turn investment into profit.
AI may now be entering its third phase.
In the past two years, the market has rewarded computing power suppliers due to explosive demand for GPUs, servers, and storage.
However, future competition may shift:
Who has the more efficient model?
Who can reduce the cost of AI applications?
Who can truly commercialize AI?
This is also why the storage industry deserves attention.
South Korea's storage giants Samsung and SK Hynix have recently benefited from growing demand for AI servers, with HBM high-bandwidth memory becoming a core component of AI infrastructure.
Meanwhile, Changxin Technology's upcoming IPO has also refocused the market on the domestic storage industry chain.
In the coming years, storage may not be just a simple cyclical rebound, but rather a structural opportunity brought by AI infrastructure upgrades.
But the risks are also obvious.
If AI capital spending grows faster than commercialization, the market may reprice the entire AI sector.
What truly deserves attention is not who shouts AI the loudest, but who can turn AI investment into real profits.
My viewpoint:
The AI rally is not over, but investment logic is changing.
In the first half, let's look at hash rate.
The second half will depend on efficiency and execution ability.
In the coming years, the competition among storage, cloud computing, and AI applications may be the true battlefield that determines the winner.
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time? Guys, did you sleep well last night?
I didn't sleep well anyway—woken up by my phone at 3 a.m., glanced at the pick: SHIB +40%, LPT +5%, Solana and BNB gains instantly lost their appeal. Rubbing his eyes to make sure he wasn't mistaken: 0.000005361. Three days ago he was lying on his stomach at 0.0000049, and when he woke up, he was almost touching 0.0000058. The group has already started shouting "hundredfold," "reset to zero," and "the dog farm is here," even LPT, a "veteran meat," has been pushed from 1.4 to 1.55.
Here's the question—who is buying? Why buy it? Is it a bull return, or a scam?
---
Market analysis: The weekend "fireworks show" is not so simple
Let's first look at SHIB's data. The 24-hour high was 0.000005827, the lowest was 0.000004906, with an amplitude close to 19%. Trading volume was 3.63 trillion SHIB, with a total turnover of 19.63 million USDT—this volume isn't exaggerated on a weekday, but in a low-liquidity weekend environment, it was enough to drive the price sky. EMA5 (0.000005355), EMA10 (0.000005344), and EMA20 (0.000005325) are all below the price, with short-term moving averages aligned in bullish alignment, and the technical outlook is indeed positive. However, note that after the high of 0.000005827, the price fell back to 0.000005361, indicating obvious selling pressure above.
Looking at LPT, it's even more typical. The 24-hour high was 1.787, the lowest was 1.423, with an amplitude of 25%+, but the current price is only 1.553, down 13% from the high. Although the EMA moving averages are bullish, trading volume has sharply shrunk from its high—VOL (LPT) is only 27.295, half of the earlier session. This combination of "surge, pullback, then shrink volume + shrinkage" is a typical example of a pulse rebound in old coins.
Key background: These two events occurred during Bitcoin's sideways trading weekend. Bitcoin is dozing off around 68k, liquidity is drying up, and small amounts of money can trigger big swings. Smart money doesn't blindly launch all-out attacks; it usually ignites the most recognizable stock first—SHIB, as the king of memes, is naturally the best "thermometer." If SHIB rises and the market follows the trend enthusiastically, it indicates that on-site funds still have vitality; If you can't keep up, then just keep lying flat.
Therefore, this rally is more like a "weekend market makers' test"—testing whether on-site funds are still active and whether anyone is willing to chase them. And what happened? SHIB fell 40% quickly and then quickly retreated; LPT dropped 25% but gave up more than half. There are followers, but their sustainability is insufficient.
---
Trading direction: Don't treat testing as a trend
Short-term strategy:
· SHIB: Currently 0.000005361, very close to EMA5. If it can rise again to 0.0000055 with increased volume today, in the short term a rebound could be seen at 0.0000058-0.0000060. However, the stop loss must be set below 0.0000052 (EMA20). Once it falls below this, it indicates that bulls are losing momentum and there is a high probability of testing the previous low of 0.0000049. A 1:2 profit-loss ratio allows for small positions to test trades.
· LPT: 1.553 is neither going up nor down. The upper 1.65-1.75 is the heavy resistance zone, while the lower 1.45 is support. If volume rises and breaks through 1.6, you can chase, but it's safer to wait for a pullback near 1.5 to buy long. This product has poor liquidity, high slippage, and a position that's half as light as SHIB.
Medium- to Long-Term Outlook:
· Over 95% of the weekend pulse rally was a false breakout. Without the Bitcoin (for example, Bitcoin breaking 70,000), these old coins will find it difficult to break out of an independent trend.
· What are SHIB's fundamentals? The rise in activity among Korean traders is positive, but the essence of meme coins is emotional gaming; without sustained narrative, there is no sustained capital.
· LPT, this "old meat," has no new story; it's purely a follower spurred by SHIB, with the worst sustainability.
My operation: In the morning session, I already reduced half my position in SHIB at 0.0000054, and didn't touch LPT. If SHIB can break through 0.0000056 with increased volume this afternoon, I'll catch up; if it falls below 0.0000053, I'll just watch the show.
---
A bit of thought: weekend fireworks are just for show
After trading for a while, you'll notice a pattern—coins that surge over the weekend often don't rise on Monday. Because the main players used low liquidity to push prices up, attracting retail investors to chase the rise over the weekend, then when liquidity recovered on Monday, they sold off accordingly. You might think it's a "weekend carnival," but it's actually a "weekend trap."
I've suffered losses too many times. Previously, when SHIB jumped 20%, I would impulsively buy in with a full sell-off, only to crash back to square one at the opening on Monday, leaving no time to stop losses. Later, I learned my lesson: during weekend pulses, only reduce positions, never increase positions. If you have a bottom position, you can sell a little on a rally; If you are short on a position, it's better to miss out than chase—because in this kind of market, chasing in will likely cause you to stand guard. If you don't chase for the most profitable amount, the safety of your principal is most important.
Also, don't try to guess "why prices are rising." Korean traders pushing? So why did LPT also rise? Are Koreans also buying LPT? Many times, the rise and fall are random fluctuations, and excuses are just to convince yourself to chase highs. A real big market is definitely a trend driven by a large pie, not just a few old coins hyping themselves over the weekend.
So, my principle is this: treat the weekend rally like fireworks, and set your direction when the market opens on Monday.
DYOR, set stop-losses and don't let fireworks blind you. 🎆
$SHIB $LPT $DOGE
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信, it has received endorsement from industry collectives 站在当前时点，凯文·沃什到底是鹰派还是鸽派？
市场对于9月的加息次数预期，已经从6月议息会议前的0.4次，抬升到现在的1.1次。市场总是习惯性事后找叙事：股市一跌，就传出沃什要重启缩表、行情要彻底完蛋；股市处在高位，又改口说他立场转鸽，马上就要降息。
现实来看，沃什重启缩表基本不现实，不要抱有幻想。年初美联储小规模扩表，是为了应对银行体系流动性紧张，如今已经没有缩表的操作余地。如果真要重新开启缩表，前提条件是先给银行业松开部分约束。
至于加息，至少现阶段，沃什对市场当前的定价状态是满意的。后续核心要看他会不会直接强硬对抗市场预期，一旦这么做，对这位新任美联储主席的公信力将会造成致命打击。
⚠️仅为市场观点推演，不构成任何投资建议。Storj Labs' Chapter 11 restructuring application focuses on whether the ecosystem fund will be used to repay debts, and the dilution expectations during the restructuring process directly engage in a game with the underlying fundamentals of normal network operation.
Current market facts show that Storj Labs has entered bankruptcy restructuring rather than liquidation, with node networks and data storage functions still running, and $STORJ market value staying just above $100 million.
The main driver of the short-term trend is the restructuring court's ruling on the debt settlement pathway, followed by rising inflation expectations leading to position clearing, with overall risk appetite in the decentralized storage sector shrinking in third place.
In the upside scenario, the restructuring plan clearly separates the token ecosystem fund from debt repayment; once old debt is removed, selling pressure is dissipated, and funds return to pricing the network value to maintain operation. The script requires observing whether the court announcement prohibits the use of token assets; if creditors signal to force token liquidation, the script becomes invalid.
In the downside scenario, the debt restructuring plan is set to fill the debt gap by issuing or consuming ecosystem funds, with dilution effects directly disrupting token economics and prompting long positions to exit faster. This scenario requires attention to the token disposal clauses in the draft; if the diluted share is locked up by long-term protocols as a guarantee, the downside scenario becomes invalid.
Across the decentralized storage sector, $FIL and $AR have experienced long-term adjustments, while $STORJ maintained its valuation based on enterprise client performance. This incident has intensified internal capital repositioning within the sector.
The most important variable to watch in the next seven days is whether the bankruptcy restructuring court's first debt restructuring draft includes plans for selling or issuing token ecosystem funds.
#美军暂停对伊空袭, progress in negotiations on the opening of the strait has #贝莱德等九机构组建安全联盟我以周期面+资金面+技术面分析：
一、当前ETH的核心逻辑
ETH并不是因为散户情绪上涨。
真正推动ETH的主要因素有三个：
① ETF资金流向
近期市场出现ETF资金重新回流迹象，机构抛压较前期明显减弱。ETH此前从1500美元附近反弹，本质上是资金开始重新评估其长期价值。
② RWA（现实资产代币化）
这是未来3-5年最重要的逻辑之一。
数据显示：
* 2026年Q1全球RWA规模已超过190亿美元
* 股票代币化、国债代币化增长非常快
* 以太坊依然是RWA最主要承载网络之一
我之前一直关注：
* ONDO
* 股票代币化
* 美光代币化
* 海力士代币化
其实这些最终很多都会与ETH生态产生关联。
③ 稳定币增长
ETH最大的护城河其实不是DeFi。
而是：
* USDT
* USDC
* RWA
* ETF
* 机构清算
这些资产大部分仍然围绕以太坊生态运行。
二、未来可能发生的利好
如果出现以下情况：
情况1：美联储开始降息
历史规律：
降息→美元走弱→风险资产走强
受益顺序通常：
BTC → ETH → 山寨币
ETH往往是第二阶段最大受益者。
情况2：ETH ETF持续净流入
如果ETF连续几个月流入：
ETH可能重新获得机构配置。
这种情况下：
2000美元不会是终点。
情况3：RWA爆发
目前市场仍低估RWA。
CoinGecko数据显示：
2025年至2026年Q1期间RWA规模增长超过250%。
如果未来两年继续高速增长：
ETH会持续受益。
三、未来可能发生的利空
最大风险1：美国经济衰退
如果出现：
* 失业率快速上升
* 美股暴跌
资金会先离开加密市场。
最大风险2：ETF资金再次流出
ETH目前仍未完全摆脱机构卖压。
如果重新出现连续流出：
ETH可能重新测试1800甚至1700区域。
最大风险3：Solana生态抢占市场
虽然ETH仍领先：
但Solana、Base等链正在争夺：
* RWA
* 支付
* 股票代币化
ETH的市场份额正在被逐步稀释。
四、未来半年走势推演
乐观情况（25%概率）
条件：
* ETF持续流入
* 美联储释放降息信号
* BTC突破历史新高
ETH可能：
1930 → 2200 → 2500 → 2800
中性情况（50%概率）
条件：
* ETF流入一般
* 美联储维持利率
ETH可能：
1800~2300区间震荡
这是我认为概率最大的情况。
悲观情况（25%概率）
条件：
* 美股大跌
* 宏观风险升温
* ETF流出
ETH可能：
1930 → 1800 → 1700
甚至测试1600。
我对ETH未来6-12个月的判断
如果让我给一个综合结论：
短线（1-4周）
偏多
目标：
1950 → 2000 → 2100
中期（3-6个月）
震荡向上
目标区间：
2200~2800
长期（2027年前）
如果：
* 降息周期开启
* RWA持续扩张
* ETF持续吸筹
那么ETH重新回到3000美元以上并不是困难的事情。
从投资角度看，我目前对ETH的判断是：
上涨概率约60%-65%，下跌概率约35%-40%。
$ETH 黄金跌到位了，但就是没人买。
3月以来，$XAUT 黄金累计下跌25.3%，1980年以来最快的一次回撤。RSI跌到24.6，非商业持仓净多头跌到2010年以来次低，估值模型隐含中枢约3861美元/盎司。三个指标都指向同一个结论：黄金已经超卖了。
然后呢？6月至今，全球黄金ETF持仓继续减少55吨。底部信号亮了，但资金就是不进来。
黄金的下跌不是“去美元化”叙事破了。
2022年以来，美元在国际支付中的份额反而上升了10.2%。60%以上的央行认为购金和“去美元化”完全无关。金价上涨是投资需求和央行购金的共振，不是谁在取代谁。
真正的凶手是两股投资需求同时退潮。
一季度全球央行购金244吨并未减速。但中国这边，A股情绪过热和人民币升值抑制了购金热情。欧美那边，实际利率上行、美元反弹背景下抛售了163吨黄金。两边同时收手，黄金就撑不住了。
黄金在等什么？
油价还在高位，地缘风险还没出清，市场预期美联储年内加息近两次。黄金在等两件事：全球流动性转松，或者地缘波动降温。这两个信号有一个出现，黄金才会真正启动。
这个剧本，加密市场是不是很熟悉？
BTC在6万附近磨了多久了？每次反弹都被压回来，每次下跌都有人在抄底。大家都在等同一个东西——美联储什么时候真的转向。黄金的“底部信号亮了但不涨”和BTC的“6万磨底”是同一个故事。两个资产都在等美联储开口。
谁先等到，谁就先跑。
（黄金的困境就是加密市场的镜子——加息预期压着所有不生息的资产。等美联储真的松口那天，最先涨的未必是黄金，可能是弹性更大的$BTC 。但在这之前，所有人都得熬着。）The market finally showed some life today.
BTC is at 65,300, up about 1%, breaking through 65,000 in the early morning and reaching a high near 65,500. ETH really showed strength this time, jumping from 1,830 straight up above 1,950, up more than 4%, finally proving it's not just the "second best".
To put it simply: there's a temporary ceasefire in the Middle East.
Trump said the strikes on Iran are paused, and Iran is stepping down accordingly, saying if the US stops, so will they. After so many days of fighting, both sides are exhausted. Once the news came out, crude oil instantly crashed 5%, US stock futures and gold all rose, and BTC and ETH followed suit.
But don’t get too excited yet; there are a few caveats to keep in mind:
First, ETFs are still running out. On Thursday and Friday, Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of 465 million, with BlackRock alone losing over 200 million on Friday. Institutions haven’t returned; this rebound is driven by sentiment, not real money buying.
Second, this week is packed with events. The Fed meets on Wednesday with a 35% chance of a rate hike—though not the most likely, it’s several times higher than last week’s 12%. On Thursday, inflation data will be released. The Senate also has a bill vote coming up. Any unexpected news could wipe out today’s gains.
Third, the Fear & Greed Index is at 39, still lingering in the fear zone. Retail investors haven’t jumped in, and sentiment hasn’t picked up, indicating no one really trusts this rebound.
Technically, BTC faces resistance between 65,500-66,500 where many are waiting to break even, and support at 64,000-64,200 as the bottom line. ETH’s short-term resistance is at 1,870-1,900, with the previous high at 1,956 being a key barrier.
So, the rise today is good news, but don’t take it too seriously. BTC is back at 65,000; the key is whether it can hold this level. Those with positions should watch 65,000 closely—if it breaks, we’re back to the old path. Those without positions shouldn’t rush in now; wait for the Fed’s decision on Wednesday. Entering now is more of a gamble than an investment. $BTC $ETH Last season, Crypto kept rewarding paper hands;
The rewarded paper hands and the shortsighted capital behind them constantly promote shortsighted behaviors and "control" public opinion and aesthetics, which has almost become an inevitable chain of dissemination;
Last season, we didn't see Doge create an ATH, nor ETH and SOL generate the gains they deserved, except for BTC barely hitting new highs;
By the way, those who have been on the four-year cycle seem to have forgotten that last season, BTC hit a new high before the halving;
Then the market started saying ETH was crap, SOL was the Holy Grail, and Pump accelerated this paper hand culture;
I don't know about others, but my honest feeling is: aside from the real meme meta PEPE brought after NFTs in 2023, there was nothing truly exciting about the last crypto season;
Not to mention the shock caused by GME, DOGE, and SHIB back then;
Only countless speedruns remained, peaking when Trump issued the currency;
But we really didn't see the birth of a legend last season; many paper players abandoned crypto to chase AI stocks half a year ago;
This is a relatively thorough clearance. The diamond hands left behind are real diamond hands, and after countless ups and downs in the wallet, they still choose to keep them;
I guess the next crypto season will reward diamond hands;
Doge and PEPE will hit new highs;
ETH will break through the $5,000 cage;
We will see memecoins 🐸🐸 reaching hundreds of billions of dollars;
When PEPE truly broke through its ATH;
The market will once again have the power to control the diamonds;
At that time, the market will wash over time and redefine what a true memecoin meta is;
- The leaders become true models of wealth creation and can weather cycles;
- Numerous projects are reconstructed and replicated, and assets with independent community attributes can be produced;
- Continuously attracting new users and new assets to crypto;
- Each cycle can spark months of climax;
- Finally, leave behind infrastructure, user habits, and cultural assets;#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
今天咱来浅谈一下，谷歌这巨头的财报到底说明了什么，对咱币圈有啥影响?
谷歌母公司 Alphabet 交出了一份看似“无可挑剔”的成绩单。
营收、利润、云业务全部超预期，尤其是谷歌云收入达到 248亿美元，AI 基础设施需求依然强劲。
按理说，这种财报应该刺激股价上涨，但市场却给出了完全不同的答案——盘后股价一度下跌。
原因很简单：
市场现在已经不满足于增长故事，开始追问投入之后能赚多少钱。
这也是这份财报真正值得关注的地方。
过去几年，AI 最大的逻辑就是一句话：
“谁投入最多，谁就能赢得未来。”
所以微软、谷歌、亚马逊、Meta纷纷疯狂砸钱建设数据中心，采购GPU、存储芯片、电力资源。
而这一次，谷歌用449亿美元资本支出再次证明：
AI军备竞赛还没有结束，甚至还在加速，毫无疑问，AI就是风向！
这对于产业链来说无疑是利好。
比如：
高端存储芯片需求继续增加；
GPU供应链持续受益；
数据中心、电力、服务器相关企业仍有成长空间。
所以财报公布后，SK海力士、美光、闪迪等“卖铲子”的公司上涨，并不奇怪。
因为谷歌告诉市场：
AI的钱，还在继续烧。
但是问题也来了。
谷歌季度自由现金流转负，这意味着什么？
简单来说，就是公司赚的钱暂时覆盖不了AI基础设施投入。
投资者开始担心：
如果AI投入持续扩大，但商业回报没有同步增长，这场烧钱大战还能持续多久？
这也是为什么市场没有继续奖励谷歌。
因为现在的投资逻辑已经从：
“AI有没有未来？”
变成：
“AI什么时候真正赚钱？”
这对于整个科技市场都是一个重要信号。
未来AI板块可能会出现明显分化：
真正拥有商业化能力、现金流稳定的公司，会继续获得资金追捧。
而单纯依靠AI概念、靠高投入讲故事的公司，可能会面临估值压力。
对于币圈来说，这份财报同样值得关注。
AI和加密市场有一个共同点：
都属于高成长、高预期资产。
当市场相信未来时，资金愿意给更高估值；
但当市场开始关注现金流和盈利兑现时，风险偏好就会下降。
短期来看：
如果AI资本开支继续扩大，算力、基础设施相关赛道依然受益。
但另一方面，如果未来市场开始担心科技巨头减少投入，那么高估值成长资产可能迎来压力，包括部分AI概念币和高波动山寨币。
所以这份谷歌财报释放出的核心信号是：
AI故事没有结束，但市场可不会等你！
以前资本市场奖励的是“敢投入”。
现在市场开始奖励的是：
“投入之后，能不能产生回报。”
对于交易者来说，最大的机会依然存在，但不能再盲目追逐概念。
AI这场战争还在继续，只是接下来拼的不再是谁烧钱最多，而是谁能最快把技术变成利润。 📊 7月26日晚间 BTC 与 ETH 市场深度分析
🔍 宏观面：下周将迎来超级宏观周，美联储利率决议、GDP 与 PCE 通胀数据将密集公布。目前市场主流预期美联储将暂停加息，资金仍在押注年内降息。只要美联储不释放过度鹰派信号，流动性宽松预期将继续支撑加密市场。地缘政治方面暂时保持温和，未出现持续性的负面冲击，整体环境对风险资产偏友好。
📈 技术面：BTC 与 ETH 目前依托均线系统稳步上行，各周期均线维持多头排列。近期回调属于短期震荡整理，下方支撑结构牢固。只要关键支撑位未被有效跌破，待本轮区间蓄势完成后，买方动能有望再度发力，推动价格突破上方压力区。
💡 操作思路（仅供参考，非投资建议）：BTC 在 63500-64000 美元区域具备较强支撑，若维持该区间，目标看 67000 美元，有效突破后下一目标 69000 美元。ETH 在 1800-1850 美元区域支撑明确，目标看 1940 美元，突破后上看 2100 美元。
市场正处于方向选择前的蓄力阶段，关注下周宏观数据落地后的方向确认。Gate的意思是：我们按照合同约定付的100000usdt和800,000 ALD到了“骗子”钱包的同时，恰巧Gate的alpha自动抓取了ALD代币，然后不能公开谁对接上币对接流程，最后骗子钱包转进了Gate alpha进行空投，是这样的吗？
哈希在这里，答案在这里
当一个项目付了钱、上了币、然后被告知“跟你沟通的人不是我们的人，并且项目登陆Gate”——这已经是Gate的公信力问题了100000 USDT、800000 ALD转入骗子钱包，恰好被Gate Alpha抓取，后续转入Gate Alpha空投。
哈希可查。
付费成功上币后，Gate称对接人不是员工。
项目顺利登陆Gate，公信力谁来负责？想向Gate求证：事实是否如你们描述？
我方支付的100000 USDT与800000 ALD先行流入第三方钱包，而后Gate Alpha自动抓取ALD代币，平台拒绝披露本次上币对接人员与流程，资产再从第三方钱包转入Gate Alpha开展空投。
所有转账哈希均可溯源，证据公开可查。
在项目完成付费、顺利上线交易后，平台单方面宣称沟通对接人员是外部骗子。
项目最终成功登陆Gate交易所，仅凭这套解释无法消除所有疑虑，此事已经严重冲击Gate市场公信力，我们要求透明、完整的官方答复。Gate的说法：我方支付的100000 USDT、800000 ALD先进入骗子钱包，碰巧Gate Alpha自动捕获ALD代币，平台拒绝公开上币对接链路，再由该钱包转账至Gate Alpha进行空投。
链上哈希就是证据。
项目付费、成功上线之后，平台才声称对接人不属于内部员工。
项目已然成功登陆Gate，整件事本质是Gate公信力重大问题，请给出合理解释！我们依照合同支付100000 USDT以及800000 ALD，资金先转入所谓“骗子”钱包，恰巧Gate Alpha自动抓取到ALD代币，平台又不肯公开本次上币完整对接流程；后续由该钱包把资产转入Gate Alpha用于空投。
链上哈希记录摆在链上，真相一目了然。
项目足额缴纳费用、顺利完成上线后，平台才告知我方全程对接人员并非Gate内部员工。
项目成功登陆Gate交易所已是既定事实，这套说辞难以自洽，严重损耗Gate自身公信力，期待官方正面清晰回应全部疑点。Brothers, have you all gotten some of SanDisk's little meats?
I told you, bottom-fishing is no problem, haha.
Let's get to the point—SNDK set an early ambush and got a little meat in hand. Here's the screenshot, check for yourself: 1479.27, today +1.09%.
Don't rush to say, "Is that all?" "—You have to see what happened yesterday. At the close of U.S. stocks on Friday, SanDisk plunged 10.79%, SK Hynix dropped 8.81%, and the entire memory chip sector was in turmoil. The Philadelphia semiconductor index fell 4.25% in a single day. The entire internet is shouting "Storage has peaked" and "The AI bubble has burst."
And then? Today, SNDKUSDT has taken it back directly.
That's the price difference we get here.
---
How to view the market?
Let's start with the news side. The trigger for Friday's sharp drop was a report from Morgan Stanley analysts warning that "the AI-driven storage industry carnival is approaching a turning point." At the same time, analyst Susquehanna lowered SanDisk's price target from $3,250 to $3,050.
Sounds pretty scary, right? But if you look closely—the target price is 3050, which still has 80% upside compared to the current price. Moreover, Wall Street's overall rating for SanDisk remains a "strong buy," with 21 out of 24 analysts giving a buy rating and an average target price of $2,368.
Now, let's talk about fundamentals. SanDisk's third-quarter revenue was $5.95 billion, a year-on-year surge of 251%, with gross margin soaring to 78.4%. The company's enterprise SSD revenue grew 233% quarter-on-quarter, and data center revenue soared 645% year-on-year. Goldman Sachs directly raised the target price from $1,200 to $2,200.
A company that made 6 billion in a quarter with a 78% gross margin—if it drops 10%, do you think it's over?
The technical aspects are clearer. Looking at the chart, the middle band of the BOLL20 is at 1469.84, the upper band at 1496.87, and the lower band at 1442.81. Today, the price pulled directly from the low back above the middle band, with a 24-hour low of 1438.68 and now at 1479.27—very clear bottom support. Earlier, it fell from a high of 2373, hitting a low near 1490, a drop of 900 points. A pullback at this level is either a trend reversal or a violent shakeout.
Which do you guys think it is?
---
Direction and strategy
Direction: Go long on pullbacks, go with the trend.
SNDK has risen 858% in just half a year. This level of trend won't be completely ruined by a single Morgan Stanley report. The imbalance between supply and demand for memory chips will continue until 2027, but the basic logic of expansion in AI servers and data centers remains unchanged. The drop is because the price has risen too much and needs to be digested, not because the company is failing.
Specific strategy:
· Entry section: Arranged in batches near 1445-1460
· First target: 1508
· Second target: 1549-1570
· Stop loss: below 1365
Don't hold too many positions; keep stop-loss in line with perpetual contracts. This wave is so volatile, a single needle could prick you out.
---
Trading insights
Here are a few honest points:
First, the news needs to be viewed from the other side. When the whole internet is panicked, opportunities often arise; when FOMO is everywhere, that is risk. On Friday, the storage sector plunged collectively, with headlines from various media outlets becoming increasingly alarming—at times like this, it's actually better to calmly think: Has the fundamentals changed? No change. So what is the drop? It's emotions.
Second, don't go against trends. SNDK rose 858% in half a year, but there will definitely be a pullback in between. But if you insist on shorting at this level of trend, how is that any different from catching a flying knife? Go long with the trend, buying in batches on pullbacks—it's ten thousand times more comfortable than guessing the top and bottom-fishing.
Third, confirm both technical and fundamental factors before taking action. The logic behind this ambush is simple: fundamentals are intact + price has returned to near the lower Bollinger band + previous lows provide support. Once all three conditions are met, just get to work.
Fourth, and most importantly—unity of knowledge and action. If you pick the right spot, you don't dare to go up; if you do, you can't hold on; if you do, you're afraid of falling. This is the fundamental reason most people don't make money. Once the strategy is set, just execute it—don't scare yourself.
---
That's all for today. This round wasn't huge, but the timing was right. Later, SNDK has its August 5 earnings report, and Stargate's enterprise SSD product line is about to recognize revenue for the first time—the big show is just beginning.
Brothers, let's chat in the comments—did you get a taste of this round?
$ETH $ETH
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress Luckily, I cut my losses last night, otherwise I'd have to wake up with Green Hair in the morning
Liquidation
BTC · safe haven
As of today (July 27, 2026) at 08:15, Bitcoin is trading at $65,228.8, with a 24-hour increase of 0.70%. The core driving force behind this round of rally comes from a significant easing in geopolitical tensions. On the news front, U.S. President Trump has suspended military strikes against Iran, leaving room for diplomatic negotiations. Iran stated that as long as the U.S. stops its military strikes, Iran will also cease its military operations. Boosted by this, the three major U.S. stock index futures in the Asia-Pacific market surged across the board at the opening, with precious metals and cryptocurrency markets strengthening collectively. Bitcoin rebounded above around $64,150 over the weekend and broke further above the $65,000 mark early this morning. From a technical perspective, BTC has turned the $64,000 area into strong support, with no 4-hour close below this level in the past three days. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of over $465 million on Thursday and Friday, but geopolitical factors effectively offset this selling pressure. In the short term, if optimism persists at the US market open, Bitcoin is expected to challenge the resistance range between $67,000 and $68,000. On the on-chain data front, whale addresses saw increased net inflows yesterday, with buying pressure defending key support. Overall, the cooling of geopolitical risks has provided Bitcoin with a temporary window for a rebound, but whether it can sustain its upward trend still depends on whether trading volume can be effectively amplified. $BTC $ETH #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard $ETH · Upgrade
Ethereum is quoted at $1,949.59, up 1.83% in 24 hours. The core catalyst for this rally is the official announcement of plans for Ethereum's next-generation protocol upgrade—the "Glamsterdam" upgrade. This upgrade plans to raise the Gas Limit Floor to 200 million, focusing on base layer expansion and providing medium- to long-term fundamental support for ETH. The market reacted positively, with ETH surging 0.62% in the short term from 22:00 to 22:15 (UTC) on July 26. Meanwhile, institutional accumulation is evident—well-known trader Arthur Hayes recently bought about 3,914.84 ETH through multiple market makers, at an average price of $1,908.86. Spot ETH ETFs continue to record significant capital inflows. On the supply side, ETH reserves on exchanges have dropped to a multi-year low of about 15.1 million tokens, a significant drop from over 21 million tokens a year ago, with over 658,000 ETH recently flowing out of mainstream platforms. Tight supply combined with institutional demand provides solid price support for ETH. Historically, Ethereum's July performance has been outstanding—an average increase of about 43% during a month's rise, while a decline of only about 5% in years of decline. In the short term, watch the $1,940 resistance level and the psychological barrier at $2,000; Support below is at $1,909 (Arthur Hayes average cost line). The Glamsterdam upgrade narrative is expected to continue driving ETH strength.