Orbit Post Sitemap
100000 USDT、800000 ALD转入骗子钱包，恰好被Gate Alpha抓取，后续转入Gate Alpha空投。
哈希可查。
付费成功上币后，Gate称对接人不是员工。
项目顺利登陆Gate，公信力谁来负责？想向Gate求证：事实是否如你们描述？
我方支付的100000 USDT与800000 ALD先行流入第三方钱包，而后Gate Alpha自动抓取ALD代币，平台拒绝披露本次上币对接人员与流程，资产再从第三方钱包转入Gate Alpha开展空投。
所有转账哈希均可溯源，证据公开可查。
在项目完成付费、顺利上线交易后，平台单方面宣称沟通对接人员是外部骗子。
项目最终成功登陆Gate交易所，仅凭这套解释无法消除所有疑虑，此事已经严重冲击Gate市场公信力，我们要求透明、完整的官方答复。Gate的说法：我方支付的100000 USDT、800000 ALD先进入骗子钱包，碰巧Gate Alpha自动捕获ALD代币，平台拒绝公开上币对接链路，再由该钱包转账至Gate Alpha进行空投。
链上哈希就是证据。
项目付费、成功上线之后，平台才声称对接人不属于内部员工。
项目已然成功登陆Gate，整件事本质是Gate公信力重大问题，请给出合理解释！我们依照合同支付100000 USDT以及800000 ALD，资金先转入所谓“骗子”钱包，恰巧Gate Alpha自动抓取到ALD代币，平台又不肯公开本次上币完整对接流程；后续由该钱包把资产转入Gate Alpha用于空投。
链上哈希记录摆在链上，真相一目了然。
项目足额缴纳费用、顺利完成上线后，平台才告知我方全程对接人员并非Gate内部员工。
项目成功登陆Gate交易所已是既定事实，这套说辞难以自洽，严重损耗Gate自身公信力，期待官方正面清晰回应全部疑点。Brothers, have you all gotten some of SanDisk's little meats?
I told you, bottom-fishing is no problem, haha.
Let's get to the point—SNDK set an early ambush and got a little meat in hand. Here's the screenshot, check for yourself: 1479.27, today +1.09%.
Don't rush to say, "Is that all?" "—You have to see what happened yesterday. At the close of U.S. stocks on Friday, SanDisk plunged 10.79%, SK Hynix dropped 8.81%, and the entire memory chip sector was in turmoil. The Philadelphia semiconductor index fell 4.25% in a single day. The entire internet is shouting "Storage has peaked" and "The AI bubble has burst."
And then? Today, SNDKUSDT has taken it back directly.
That's the price difference we get here.
---
How to view the market?
Let's start with the news side. The trigger for Friday's sharp drop was a report from Morgan Stanley analysts warning that "the AI-driven storage industry carnival is approaching a turning point." At the same time, analyst Susquehanna lowered SanDisk's price target from $3,250 to $3,050.
Sounds pretty scary, right? But if you look closely—the target price is 3050, which still has 80% upside compared to the current price. Moreover, Wall Street's overall rating for SanDisk remains a "strong buy," with 21 out of 24 analysts giving a buy rating and an average target price of $2,368.
Now, let's talk about fundamentals. SanDisk's third-quarter revenue was $5.95 billion, a year-on-year surge of 251%, with gross margin soaring to 78.4%. The company's enterprise SSD revenue grew 233% quarter-on-quarter, and data center revenue soared 645% year-on-year. Goldman Sachs directly raised the target price from $1,200 to $2,200.
A company that made 6 billion in a quarter with a 78% gross margin—if it drops 10%, do you think it's over?
The technical aspects are clearer. Looking at the chart, the middle band of the BOLL20 is at 1469.84, the upper band at 1496.87, and the lower band at 1442.81. Today, the price pulled directly from the low back above the middle band, with a 24-hour low of 1438.68 and now at 1479.27—very clear bottom support. Earlier, it fell from a high of 2373, hitting a low near 1490, a drop of 900 points. A pullback at this level is either a trend reversal or a violent shakeout.
Which do you guys think it is?
---
Direction and strategy
Direction: Go long on pullbacks, go with the trend.
SNDK has risen 858% in just half a year. This level of trend won't be completely ruined by a single Morgan Stanley report. The imbalance between supply and demand for memory chips will continue until 2027, but the basic logic of expansion in AI servers and data centers remains unchanged. The drop is because the price has risen too much and needs to be digested, not because the company is failing.
Specific strategy:
· Entry section: Arranged in batches near 1445-1460
· First target: 1508
· Second target: 1549-1570
· Stop loss: below 1365
Don't hold too many positions; keep stop-loss in line with perpetual contracts. This wave is so volatile, a single needle could prick you out.
---
Trading insights
Here are a few honest points:
First, the news needs to be viewed from the other side. When the whole internet is panicked, opportunities often arise; when FOMO is everywhere, that is risk. On Friday, the storage sector plunged collectively, with headlines from various media outlets becoming increasingly alarming—at times like this, it's actually better to calmly think: Has the fundamentals changed? No change. So what is the drop? It's emotions.
Second, don't go against trends. SNDK rose 858% in half a year, but there will definitely be a pullback in between. But if you insist on shorting at this level of trend, how is that any different from catching a flying knife? Go long with the trend, buying in batches on pullbacks—it's ten thousand times more comfortable than guessing the top and bottom-fishing.
Third, confirm both technical and fundamental factors before taking action. The logic behind this ambush is simple: fundamentals are intact + price has returned to near the lower Bollinger band + previous lows provide support. Once all three conditions are met, just get to work.
Fourth, and most importantly—unity of knowledge and action. If you pick the right spot, you don't dare to go up; if you do, you can't hold on; if you do, you're afraid of falling. This is the fundamental reason most people don't make money. Once the strategy is set, just execute it—don't scare yourself.
---
That's all for today. This round wasn't huge, but the timing was right. Later, SNDK has its August 5 earnings report, and Stargate's enterprise SSD product line is about to recognize revenue for the first time—the big show is just beginning.
Brothers, let's chat in the comments—did you get a taste of this round?
$ETH $ETH
#财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress Luckily, I cut my losses last night, otherwise I'd have to wake up with Green Hair in the morning
Liquidation
BTC · safe haven
As of today (July 27, 2026) at 08:15, Bitcoin is trading at $65,228.8, with a 24-hour increase of 0.70%. The core driving force behind this round of rally comes from a significant easing in geopolitical tensions. On the news front, U.S. President Trump has suspended military strikes against Iran, leaving room for diplomatic negotiations. Iran stated that as long as the U.S. stops its military strikes, Iran will also cease its military operations. Boosted by this, the three major U.S. stock index futures in the Asia-Pacific market surged across the board at the opening, with precious metals and cryptocurrency markets strengthening collectively. Bitcoin rebounded above around $64,150 over the weekend and broke further above the $65,000 mark early this morning. From a technical perspective, BTC has turned the $64,000 area into strong support, with no 4-hour close below this level in the past three days. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded net outflows of over $465 million on Thursday and Friday, but geopolitical factors effectively offset this selling pressure. In the short term, if optimism persists at the US market open, Bitcoin is expected to challenge the resistance range between $67,000 and $68,000. On the on-chain data front, whale addresses saw increased net inflows yesterday, with buying pressure defending key support. Overall, the cooling of geopolitical risks has provided Bitcoin with a temporary window for a rebound, but whether it can sustain its upward trend still depends on whether trading volume can be effectively amplified. $BTC $ETH #交易之声: Your experience deserves to be heard $ETH · Upgrade
Ethereum is quoted at $1,949.59, up 1.83% in 24 hours. The core catalyst for this rally is the official announcement of plans for Ethereum's next-generation protocol upgrade—the "Glamsterdam" upgrade. This upgrade plans to raise the Gas Limit Floor to 200 million, focusing on base layer expansion and providing medium- to long-term fundamental support for ETH. The market reacted positively, with ETH surging 0.62% in the short term from 22:00 to 22:15 (UTC) on July 26. Meanwhile, institutional accumulation is evident—well-known trader Arthur Hayes recently bought about 3,914.84 ETH through multiple market makers, at an average price of $1,908.86. Spot ETH ETFs continue to record significant capital inflows. On the supply side, ETH reserves on exchanges have dropped to a multi-year low of about 15.1 million tokens, a significant drop from over 21 million tokens a year ago, with over 658,000 ETH recently flowing out of mainstream platforms. Tight supply combined with institutional demand provides solid price support for ETH. Historically, Ethereum's July performance has been outstanding—an average increase of about 43% during a month's rise, while a decline of only about 5% in years of decline. In the short term, watch the $1,940 resistance level and the psychological barrier at $2,000; Support below is at $1,909 (Arthur Hayes average cost line). The Glamsterdam upgrade narrative is expected to continue driving ETH strength.Evening Analysis for Bitcoin and Ethereum July 26 On the macro front, next week is shaping up to be a super-heavy week with the Fed interest rate decision, GDP data, and PCE inflation numbers all dropping at once. The market consensus is that the Fed will pause on rate adjustments, while liquidity expectations remain tilted toward a rate cut later this year. As long as the Fed doesn't deliver any ultra-hawkish surprises, the crypto market should continue to benefit from this supportive liquidity📊 $SOL 爆仓速览
爆仓规模
· 1小时：$3.94万
· 4小时：$373.42万
· 12小时：$526.47万
· 24小时：$571.91万
多空分布
周期 多头爆仓 空头爆仓 多头占比
1h $3.87万 $765.70 98.1%
4h $9.95万 $363.47万 2.7%
12h $27.73万 $498.74万 5.3%
24h $34.07万 $537.84万 6.0%
多空解读
各周期空头爆仓碾压多头（24小时空头占94.0%），为持续极端逼空上涨行情。1小时多头爆仓略占主导（98.1%），但规模极小可视为开盘扰动；4小时和12小时空头占比高达94.7%~97.3%，为全天最剧烈逼空窗口；24小时空头爆仓$537.84万，为多头的15.8倍，空头遭毁灭性清算。最终胜出方：多头——价格呈单边暴力上涨，空头连续止损出清。
时间分布
· 1小时占24小时的 0.69%
· 4小时占24小时的 65.3%
· 12小时占24小时的 92.1%
爆仓极端集中于4-12小时周期（合计约92%），说明逼空主升浪在4-12小时内集中爆发并基本完成；24小时总量与12小时基本持平，后12小时增量极为有限。当前处于逼空行情高位尾声阶段，空头力量已基本出清，但极端涨幅后需警惕剧烈回调风险。
一句话解读
$SOL 24小时空头爆仓$537.84万占总量94%，4-12小时集中爆发逼空主升浪，多头完胜。
🔥 市场风向标 | 7月24日
今日三条热点，指向同一主题：AI的代价、监管的搁浅，以及地缘悬崖边的喘息。
📊 谷歌与特斯拉：AI盛宴的“账单”来了
两份财报揭开了AI叙事的残酷真相。
谷歌超预期但代价沉重：总营收1198亿美元，同比增长24%；谷歌云收入247.7亿美元，同比暴涨82%。然而，资本开支高达449亿美元，自由现金流首次转负至-59亿美元。盘后一度跌近5%。
特斯拉增收不增利：营收282.4亿美元，同比增长26%；但营业利润仅3.98亿美元，同比暴跌57%，运营利润率只剩1.4%。自由现金流两年多来首次转负。盘后跌超4%。
信号：谷歌的AI已在云业务中形成收入闭环；而特斯拉的Robotaxi和Optimus仍停留在“故事”阶段。市场正在惩罚只有概念、没有现金流的AI叙事。
📜 CLARITY法案搁浅：14亿美元的伦理困局
加密行业的监管希望正在消散。参议院共和党虽释放更新文本并加入道德条款，但7名民主党参议员集体否决。参议院多数党领袖图恩明确表示，法案大概率无法在8月7日休会前通过。
根本障碍：特朗普通过加密业务获得的约14亿美元收益成为最大阻力。民主党要求更严格的伦理条款，防止总统在其政府监管下继续从加密行业获利。
Polymarket预测市场显示，年内通过概率已从80%以上骤降至37%。错过8月窗口，拖入秋季选举，2026年通过可能性将大幅下降。
🚢 美军暂停空袭：地缘悬崖边的喘息
当地时间7月25日，特朗普下令美军当天不要对伊朗发动新空袭，结束了此前连续13天的每日打击行动。
暂停空袭前数小时，阿曼代表团已抵达德黑兰，就重启霍尔木兹海峡通航展开谈判，据称已取得进展。布伦特原油此前已突破100美元/桶，若谈判取得突破，油价有望回落。
信号：这是一次战术性暂停——为外交留空间，但美军恢复打击的预案仍在准备中。
💎 总结
三件事勾勒出当下市场的核心矛盾：AI的账单正在到来——谷歌和特斯拉用史上首次负现金流告诉市场，AI烧得比想象中更快；监管的窗口正在关闭——14亿美元的伦理困局让CLARITY法案年内通过希望渺茫；而地缘的喘息能持续多久，取决于阿曼斡旋的成败。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展 $PUMP thesis + trade setup from stream last week $1M a day with worst onchain conditions is notable, one of the few stories in crypto where the issue is actually the narrative & sentiment instead of the actual fundamentals of the business if $SOL onchain picks back up this hits all time highs relatively easily, $HYPE currently trades at a 15x higher valuation & they have the same two year revenue numbers#EarningsRealityCheck #CLARITYActStalled #USIranStrikePause 🚨 $ORDI – CONSOLIDATING – RSI 40 – OVERSOLD BOUNCE LOADING?
📊 Price: 3.811 (-0.15%) – holding above 24H low 3.602.
🔑 Resistance: 4.102 – break = 🚀 target 4.20+.
🛡️ Support: 3.856 (SAR) – reclaim needed for bullish continuation.
📈 Techs: Price below SAR but near EMAs – consolidation. MACD near zero – momentum flat. RSI6 at 40.19 – approaching oversold. KDJ oversold (K 24.19, D 32.40).
💡 Catalyst: Meme coin rotation – but $ORDI waiting for direction.
🎯 Play: Aggressive long above 3.85, stop 3.75, target 4.00–4.05. Safer: wait for SAR reclaim.
⚡ Verdict: Oversold – but SAR is the wall!
#ORDI #MemeCoin #Crypto盘面变了
$ETH 早上打开盘面看了一眼
1910的空单还在
但4小时图已经不是开仓时的样子了
价格从1887拉到1966
一根大阳线捅穿1900
MACD水上金叉 绿柱放量
均线全部拐头往上
我之前做空的逻辑是摸顶
但现在顶没摸到
底部反转信号倒是出来了
这单浮亏188% 看着吓人
拆开看 保证金30U
持仓1.5个 实际亏了56.4U
强平在4300 远到不用惦记
但留着它已经不是钱的问题
是判断的问题
做空逻辑被盘面证伪了
哪怕亏了也要走
不是止损 是认错
平掉 这一页就过去了
$BTC 在65000上方稳住了
日线多头排列
周末那波流动性枯竭的担忧
暂时告一段落
大盘选完方向
接下来就是找做多的机会
$ESP 是今天自选里最抢眼的
日线从0.07的平台带量突破
一根线拉到0.11
单日涨了19%
成交额1.19亿
不是那种几万刀就能画门的死盘
有真金白银打进去了
但涨了19%再追
回撤5到10个点就很疼
在0.095到0.10区间挂个限价多单
等回踩不破再进
如果一路拉到0.13不回头
那就跟我没关系 不惋惜
今天三件事
平掉ETH空单
把周末看的那些小币清空
挂好ESP的回踩单
大盘选了方向 就不做空了
56.4U的亏损是一堂课
不用反复琢磨
今天的任务是等一个回踩买点
管好手 别追高$OKB OKB 🔥 **$84.51**, up **+2.69%** in 24h, pushing up from yesterday's $82.55
📊 Looking directly at the market—SMA-200 is holding down at **$85.49**, and I've touched this level three times since July 16 but haven't moved past it. Yesterday, it surged to $84.88 with heavy volume and then pulled back down. But the advantage is that the RSI is only **62**, not having entered a hot zone, so it's not the kind of pattern where a surge leads to a crash.
⚠️ Trading volume is a problem—24h only $4.89 million**, 23% below the 30-day average. This rally seems more like a passive increase driven by reluctant selling, rather than active buying rushing in. The 200-day moving average at $85.49 is the most critical hurdle this week.
💎 On the fundamentals side—on 7/26, OKX just completed the **279M OKB permanent burn**, cutting the supply directly from 300 million to **21 million tokens**, the same amount as BTC. This is not an expectation, but a fact that has already happened. After the destruction, the smart contract was upgraded, with all mint and burn functions removed. **21 million is the permanent hard cap** [Source: OKX official FAQ] (https://www.okx.com/en-gb/help/x-layer-okt-okb).
🌐 The X Layer ecosystem has recently exploded—the World Cup prediction event just ended on 7/19, with **433,000 participants**, a prize pool of $4.2 million, and 136 million on-chain transactions in 30 days**, delayed <100ms。 After Exchange OS goes live, developers can build their own exchanges based on X Layer, with Chainlink, Nansen, and Pyth all joining as partners. The ecosystem's activity is on a completely different level compared to three months ago.
📉 But there's one change to note—OKB** can no longer be used to offset exchange fees**. OKX officially states that holding OKB doesn't affect fee discount tiers. This effectively removes one of the biggest reasons for holding OKB, and long-term holders may gradually loosen their stance.
🎯 Summary: $78 (SMA-50) is the solid bottom, $80-82 is the accumulation zone, and $85.49 is the must-break level this week. After volume surpassed $85.5, the next target is $90+. If shrinking volume continues to grind, the price will be sideways between $82 and $85. The $21 million hard ceiling is the strongest long-term logic, but don't chase in the short term—wait for confirmation when the $82 pullback hits.⚠️ 退出队列清零？这不是安全通道打开，是着火大楼的出口指示灯全灭了，而入口还在排长队！
听好了，兄弟们——以太坊的验证器退出队列归零，等于说火场里最后那扇防火门彻底敞开了，之前2.6百万ETH堵在逃生楼梯口，现在人全撤干净了。但别高兴太早！看看对面：248万ETH正排队等着进场质押，最快也要43天才能挤进去——这就像整栋楼刚刚疏散完，楼外又涌进两倍的人要往里冲，还特么带着氧气瓶和抵押合约。
当前4029万ETH被质押，占总供应33.55%，88.5万个活跃验证员平均拿着2.64%年化利息。退出通道虽然空了，但流入的队列却在涨，净质押流从流出翻成了流入。这在我眼里就是：火势刚控制住，热成像仪显示墙里还有阴燃源，可指挥部却在安排新人员进场铺设防火毯——战术上叫“回火风险”。
作为一线消防员，我只看三点：1. 安全通道是否随时可启用；2. 防火隔离带够不够厚；3. 进火场前有没有备用呼吸器。现在退出通道暂时畅通，但一旦质押队列积压成新的燃烧物，流动性起火时，这扇门还可能再次堵死。别被表面“清零”骗了，真正的风险在于：当你需要跑路时，门口排队的还能变成你的逃生路障吗？
记住，火场里最贵的不是没烧到的仓位，而是你逃生时才发现出口早已被锁死。# #ethexitqueuezero📊 $ETH **ETH Quick Commentary — 7/27**
**$1,884**, up 1.6% in 24 hours, stronger than BTC's 1%. More importantly—something interesting happened last night.
🔥 **$54.71 million short positions were liquidated, 88% of which were shorts. **ETH alone accounts for **$34.17 million**, while BTC is only $9.08 million. What does this indicate? This rebound wasn't driven by BTC, but by ETH itself. A bunch of short sellers were forcibly liquidated, becoming fuel for the rise.
📈 Technical aspects are being repaired. The ETH/BTC exchange rate climbed from 0.0269 to **0.0292**, and the Altcoin Season Index rose 5.45% in one day to **58**. Funds began flowing from BTC to ETH and altcoins. RSI 68 — a bit hot but not yet topped, $1,870 (Ichimoku Balance Baseline) has become short-term support.
⚠️ However, trading volume dropped by 42%, indicating low participation in this rebound. It is more like a passive rise driven by bears being squeezed rather than driven by active buying. $1,920-1,925 is immediate resistance, while $1,850 is the lower support.
💰 The ETF side has both pros and cons. On July 24, $70.62 million was outflowed, interrupting five consecutive days of gains, but the net inflow for the week was $104 million, three consecutive weeks of gains, and July cumulative was $338 million. Moreover, ETH ETFs have seen more inflows than BTC ETFs for two consecutive weeks—smart money is quietly re-exchanging.
🔒 In terms of staking: The amount of staking canceled has hit a historic low, **78% of ETH is still being staked**. The previously mentioned validator exit queue reset to zero, but this signal remains unchanged. Those who lock up > those who run away.
💡 My judgment: **Short-term bullish, but don't chase. ** The $1,900 area was pulled up by bearish stamps, not real cash piles. If the $1,850-1,870 level holds below the rebound, consider buying; only after holding above $1,925 is there hope to break to $2,000. $1,842 is the hard stop-loss line.New Hampshire is preparing to issue $100 million in Bitcoin bonds. It sounds really intimidating, right? It's a bit like the feeling of a national level starting to hoard coins. But after a closer look, research institutions labeled this matter as a 'liquidation trigger' risk, meaning the 100M wasn't taken for free—if $ When BTC prices drop to a certain level, collateral liquidation may be triggered—this scenario is all too familiar. In 2024, micro-strategies are going wild, and in 2025, a bunch of national funds have jumped in. But by July 2026, everyone is holding floating losses. Some people see this news as a signal for a major bull market, but I think it's better to suppress sentiment first. Bonds aren't just buying coins directly—they're using taxpayers' credit for leveraged liquidation. Once triggered, the target is spot $ BTC had been stalling around 68,000 these past two days, but after the news broke, it pulled slightly but quickly rebounded, indicating the market isn't buying it. Institutions are watching the liquidation line for now. Don't panic for now—not to say this bond is bound to collapse, but it represents a dangerous consensus. Local governments believe Bitcoin can provide a fiscal bottom but are unwilling to buy with real money, all playing structured products. When the liquidation line is reached, will they buy it or not? The executive committee members might not even have touched the private keys. I can't imagine letting Levimore vote on life or death. #美股全线走高, crypto stocks led the #特朗普将决定是否扩大对伊战事 #芯片股反弹, and short positions in US stocks hit record highs 下周可能是今年美股最危险的一周。
美联储议息+微软亚马逊Meta苹果四家同时发财报。
但真正的风险不是业绩差，是业绩太好。
谷歌刚证明了一件事：赚再多的钱，只要Capex继续加，市场就往下砸。
Alphabet财报营收利润全部beat，结果股价暴跌，原因就一个，AI资本开支又加码了。
市场不再奖励增长，开始惩罚花钱。
下周四家巨头如果重复谷歌的剧本，业绩超预期但Capex再往上拉，半导体可能还要再挨一轮。
同一周还有美联储议息会议。7月29日周二出决议，沃什上任后第二次主持。
这个人的风格跟鲍威尔完全不同：不给前瞻指引，不透露底牌，市场根本猜不到他要干什么。
目前联邦基金利率3.5%-3.75%，市场主流预期维持不变，连续第五次按兵不动。但加息的概率没有归零。
油价刚突破100美元，中东局势持续升级，通胀压力在重新抬头。
法国巴黎银行的原话："美联储意外加息的可能性并不能完全排除"。
10年期美债收益率已经突破4.7%，2025年初以来最高。
债券收益率越高，对股票的竞争压力越大。
所以下周的局面是：美联储如果放鹰，市场往下砸。
财报如果Capex继续加码，半导体和AI链再挨一轮。
两个方向同一周撞在一起，波动率不会小。
下周还有一串宏观数据：二季度GDP、月度通胀数据、消费者信心指数。
任何一个超预期都可能加大加息预期。
但反过来想，如果美联储措辞温和+财报Capex没有超预期大幅加码，这一周也可能成为反弹的起点。
市场已经跌了一个月，半导体板块7月跌了18%，仓位已经不挤了。
利空出尽的反转，往往就发生在所有人都觉得"还要跌"的时候。
这一周的结果，大概率定义下半年的方向。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ $BTC SK Hynix has plummeted again; what exactly is it falling for this time?
Last Friday, SK Hynix's Korean main stock closed down 8.34%.
After the U.S. ADR opened, it also dropped sharply, ending down 8.81%.
From the late June peak near 2,990,000 KRW, the maximum drawdown in one month has exceeded 40%.
The drop is indeed quite scary.
But from what I see, this time it’s not that SK Hynix’s fundamentals suddenly collapsed.
It’s more like several factors piled up simultaneously, triggering a concentrated sell-off.
✔ AI capital expenditures are being re-evaluated
Although Alphabet increased AI investment, its stock price fell about 7% due to cash flow pressure.
The market is no longer asking "Should we invest more in AI?" but rather "How long will it take to recoup the invested money?"
This sentiment naturally spread to upstream memory stocks like SK Hynix and Micron.
✔ Memory price rally trades are too crowded
Previously, everyone was trading on HBM shortages, DRAM price increases, and booming AI demand.
But when TrendForce started indicating that some NAND demand might gradually normalize, the market immediately worried whether memory prices had already reached a near-term peak.
It’s not that fundamentals are about to reverse.
Rather, the current stock price can no longer tolerate much news below expectations.
✔ Foreign and institutional investors are cashing out together
Last Friday, foreign and institutional investors net sold over 2.6 trillion KRW worth of SK Hynix.
Combined with a large number of single-stock leveraged ETFs in the Korean market, after the price drop, reducing positions and hedging easily amplify the sell-off.
So the current volatility in SK Hynix is no longer just a reflection of company fundamentals.
It also involves a lot of leverage, arbitrage, and sentiment-driven trading.
✔ Chairman’s divorce case is just an emotional amplifier
The court ruling that Choi Tae-won must pay 944 billion KRW in property division indeed increased market concerns about pledged shares and asset sales.
But he does not directly hold SK Hynix stock.
This matter is more like an additional layer of governance noise, not the fundamental cause of SK Hynix’s plunge.
Technically, the key levels to watch next are:
✔ Around 1,750,000 KRW: current first support
✔ 1,680,000–1,700,000 KRW: next support if broken
✔ 1,840,000–1,900,000 KRW: area to reclaim first on rebound
✔ 1,920,000–2,000,000 KRW: the level that truly decides if the trend can recover
If the 1,750,000 KRW level continues to fail, this downtrend likely isn’t over yet.
If it can climb back above 1,900,000 KRW, the short-term bleeding can be considered truly stopped.
I won’t simply think it’s cheap just because it dropped 40%.
But I also won’t simply interpret this drop as the end of the AI memory cycle.
What’s really being killed this round are overly high expectations, crowded positions, and out-of-control leverage.
The July 29 earnings report will be SK Hynix’s real test going forward.
The most dangerous thing for SK Hynix now is not that no one believes in AI.
It’s that too many people have already bought in the best-case scenario in advance. WEMIX shamed for $720,000—why hasn't the market panicked?
On December 26, the WEMIX project team disclosed that attackers exploited a vulnerability related to WEMIX$ contracts to steal 724,198 USDC.e, approximately $724,000, after which part of the funds were transferred to exchanges. The project team immediately suspended core services such as cross-chain bridges and liquidity pools. This amount is not large for WEMIX's market cap, but the key question is: does the contract vulnerability pose deeper risks?
In contrast to the small-scale WEMIX attack, another established exchange, BitMart, announced it would be completely shut down in January due to the collapse of its BMX token and difficulties for users withdrawing funds. BitMart was not attacked, but rather due to poor management leading to its shutdown. This reminds us that security incidents and financial crises are two different types of risk.
The follow-up signals for a WEMIX attack are simple: if the project team can restore bridge services in the near future without secondary vulnerabilities, it means the problem is under control; Conversely, if the system is suspended for a long time or user assets are lost, the security level must be reassessed. Currently, there is no evidence of user funds being damaged, but contract audit reports will be the next critical milestone.
#WEMIX #安全事件 #星球日报 📊 $XRP Quick Overview of Liquidation
Scale of liquidations
· 1 hour: $75.24
· 4 hours: $472,900
· 12 hours: $554,000
· 24 hours: $768,800
Mostly and bearish distribution
Cycle: Bull liquidation, short liquidation, long position
1h $0 $75.24 0%
4h $3,693.02 $469,200 0.8%
12h $15,800 $538,200 2.8%
24h $194,700 $574,100 25.3%
Duokong interpretation
Across cycles, short blowouts crushed bulls (24-hour short positions accounted for 74.7%), indicating a sustained short-squeeze rally. Within 1 hour, short liquidations account for 100%, with extreme short squeezes at the open; The 4-hour and 12-hour short positions account for as much as 97.2%~97.9%, making it the most intense short squeeze window of the day; The 24-hour bullish counterattack has slightly strengthened, but bears still dominate the market. Ultimate winner: Bulls—Bears face large-scale liquidation, prices continue to rise strongly.
Time distribution
· 1 hour accounts for 0.01% of 24 hours
· 4 hours accounts for 61.5% of 24 hours
· 12 hours accounts for 72.1% of 24 hours
Liquidations are highly concentrated in the 4-12 hour cycle (over 70% in total), indicating that the main short squeeze wave erupted within 4-12 hours; The 24-hour total volume is not much different from the 12-hour period, but the increase in the last 12 hours is limited, indicating that the short squeeze is nearing its end. Currently, the market is at the end of the high level of the short squeeze phase, with bears suffering heavy losses, but caution is needed regarding profit-taking pressure.
A one-sentence explanation
$XRP 24-hour short liquidations totaled $574,100, accounting for 74.7% of the total, with short squeezes dominating the market and bulls winning decisively.
🔥 Market Barometer | July 24th
Today's three hot topics point to the same theme: the cost of AI, regulatory stalls, and the breathing on the edge of the geopolitical cliff.
📊 Google and Tesla: The "bill" for the AI feast has arrived
Two financial reports have revealed the harsh truth behind AI narratives.
Google beats expectations but comes at a heavy cost: total revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-on-year; Google Cloud revenue was $24.77 billion, an 82% year-on-year increase. However, capital expenditures reached $44.9 billion, and free cash flow turned negative for the first time to -$5.9 billion. After hours, it once fell nearly 5%.
Tesla's revenue growth without profit growth: revenue of $28.24 billion, up 26% year-on-year; However, operating profit was only $398 million, a year-on-year plunge of 57%, with an operating margin of just 1.4%. Free cash flow turned negative for the first time in over two years. It fell more than 4% in after-hours trading.
Signal: Google's AI has formed a closed revenue loop in its cloud business; Meanwhile, Tesla's Robotaxi and Optimus remain at the "story" stage. The market is punishing AI narratives that are concept-heavy but lack cash flow.
📜 CLARITY Act Stalled: A $1.4 Billion Ethical Dilemma
Regulatory hopes for the crypto industry are fading. Although Senate Republicans released updated text and added a morality clause, seven Democratic senators collectively vetoed it. Senate Majority Leader Toon Toon made it clear that the bill is unlikely to pass before the August 7 recess.
Fundamental obstacle: The roughly $1.4 billion gains Trump gained from crypto business became the biggest obstacle. The Democrats are demanding stricter ethical clauses to prevent the president from continuing to profit from the crypto industry under government oversight.
Polymarket forecasts show that the probability of passing within the year has plummeted from over 80% to 37%. Missing the August window and dragging into the autumn elections will greatly reduce the chances of passing in 2026.
🚢 U.S. military pauses airstrikes: a breather on the edge of a geopolitical cliff
On July 25 local time, Trump ordered the U.S. military not to launch new airstrikes on Iran that day, ending a 13-day continuous daily strike campaign.
A few hours before the airstrike pause, the Omani delegation had already arrived in Tehran to begin negotiations to resume navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, reportedly making progress. Brent crude had previously surpassed $100 per barrel, and if negotiations break through, oil prices are expected to retreat.
Signal: This is a tactical pause—to leave room for diplomacy, but the U.S. military is still preparing contingency plans for resuming strikes.
💎 Summary
Three events outline the core contradictions in the current market: The bill for AI is approaching—Google and Tesla are telling the market that, for the first time ever, negative cash flow is heating up faster than expected; The regulatory window is closing—the $1.4 billion ethical dilemma makes it hard for the CLARITY Act to pass within the year; How long the pause in the geography lasts depends on the success or failure of Oman's mediation. #财报观察员: Who can truly understand the real answer sheet from Google and Tesla this time?
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress 最后的挣扎罢了💥
我就不信你还能一直拉
50000U仓位直接梭哈做空
狗庄赶紧砸盘
我要睡觉了
睡醒直接收菜
——
$SHIB 周线大趋势还没有真正反转
价格虽然从低位弹了起来
但依旧压在MA20下方
MACD只是弱修复
这波更像超跌反弹
一旦追涨资金接不住
怎么拉上去就可能怎么砸下来
——
BTC在64800附近震荡
64000是短线多空分界线
跌破容易继续回踩
但ETF已经连续多日出现净流入
下方仍有资金承接
所以可以看空
但不能把反弹当成毫无抵抗的送分行情
——
$ETH 整体表现明显弱于BTC
前期资金数据里
ETH资金费率一度转负
期权资金也更偏向下跌保护
说明市场对ETH的反弹信心依旧不足
BTC只要转弱
ETH大概率会放大波动
——
$LAB 现在只剩0.15美元附近
七天继续下跌超过13%
相比一个月前已经跌掉接近99%
前面的销毁和项目方喊话
暂时没有真正修复市场信心
再加上近期还有代币解锁压力
反弹更像给套牢盘跑路的机会
这盘面确实偏空
但20倍逐仓去睡觉
最好还是把止损挂上
别最后不是你睡醒收菜
而是狗庄半夜收走你的仓位
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
$SHIB #韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单 $SKHYNIX 看了一下SK海力士的二季度业绩预期，我觉得这份数据最大的意义，不是利润创新高，而是再次证明AI对存储的需求还在持续兑现。
市场一致预期，SK海力士第二季度营业利润64.1万亿韩元。如果最终公布的数据接近这个水平，那么公司一个季度赚的钱，就已经超过了2025年全年。
再加上三星此前给出的89.4万亿韩元营业利润指引，两家韩国存储厂商单季度利润有望突破150万亿韩元。
很多人前段时间一直在讨论，HBM是不是快见顶了、AI资本开支会不会放缓。
但至少从目前披露的数据来看，我觉得还没有看到这种迹象。
一方面，HBM依然是最赚钱的产品，利润率维持在75%以上，说明高端产品供需关系还是比较紧，没有进入价格竞争阶段。
另一方面，KB证券预计，SK海力士第二季度约70%的收入来自全球科技公司和AI数据中心。这意味着公司业绩增长，依然主要依赖AI基础设施建设，而不是消费电子回暖。
我现在更关注的反而不是这份财报本身，而是管理层对下半年的展望。
如果他们继续强调HBM订单饱满、先进封装产能持续吃紧，同时AI客户没有削减资本开支，那市场对于整个存储板块的盈利预期，大概率还有继续上修的空间。
至少站在现在这个时间点，我认为存储的基本面并没有发生变化，AI仍然是这一轮行业景气度最核心的驱动力。SOPH 这次迁移，表面看只是一次充提维护，实际是在提醒持币人：老链要退场了，资产入口要换到以太坊。 OKX 7 月 24 日发公告，说会支持 $SOPH 从 Sophon 网络迁到 Ethereum ERC-20。时间点给得很清楚：7 月 30 日 8:00 UTC 暂停 SOPH 充提并开始迁移，迁移窗口预计到 7 月 31 日 12:00 UTC。期间现货交易不受影响，迁移完成后，OKX 只恢复以太坊网络上的 SOPH 充提，旧 Sophon 网络的 SOPH 入金就不再支持。 这类公告我不会只当“平台支持升级”看。真正要看的，是项目自己也在收旧链。Sophon 文档写明，Legacy Sophon Chain 正在 winding down，新存入从 2026 年 6 月 25 日起就停了；用户连接旧网络，主要是为了查看余额、领奖励、把资产提出来。桥接说明也更直白：SOPH 原生在 Ethereum，不需要额外 token swap；从 Sophon 提到 Ethereum 走 canonical route，Sophon 本身也不再接 LayerZero 直连。 所以这事对散#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单
Monday Monday, forced start-up, good workday everyone.
The Korean storage giants seem a bit off, let's analyze carefully:
Peeling away the surface illusion of dividends.
It's all fatal hidden dangers.
Currently, the whole network is hyping that the Korean storage giants have secured a trillion-dollar AI cooperation deal with the US, unanimously bullish on storage market.
But my view is completely opposite; the storage market story is basically over, the hidden risk of a new round of economic collapse in Korea has been planted. This is actually the new era Plaza Accord, Korea is about to repeat Japan's 1990s tragedy.
On July 25, Samsung $SAMSUNG, SK Hynix $SKHYNIX, and a number of US tech giants reached a chip strategic cooperation framework, with a total scale of 1375 trillion KRW, equivalent to $940 billion USD, over 6.3 trillion RMB. Over the weekend, major financial bloggers and retail investors unanimously treated this as a super bullish event, crazily bullish on HBM and the storage sector.
Behind this, I see only risks!
First, the industry supply-demand inflection point is forcibly brought forward, shortening the super boom cycle by a year. According to the original capacity plan, by the end of 2027, Korean companies' HBM monthly capacity would be 130,000 wafers, and the supply shortage pattern could have been steadily maintained until the end of 2028, which was the core support for this round of super storage market.
But after this cooperation and expansion, by the end of 2027, HBM monthly capacity will directly rise to 190,000 wafers, significantly advancing the supply-demand balance inflection point. Capital markets always react in advance; main funds will cash out a year or even a year and a half early, and the high prosperity premium and valuation space of storage will soon completely end.
More critically, this huge cooperation is only a supply intention framework, not a rigidly locked purchase contract.
But Samsung and SK Hynix have already been forced to start large-scale expansion, now they have to invest heavily in building new factories, purchasing equipment, and expanding capacity. All heavy asset investments are irreversible.
If in the future, US giants like Microsoft, Google, Amazon slow down AI commercialization profits, revenue growth can't keep up with continuous cash-burning investment pace, they can reduce or even abandon purchase plans at any time. Then the massive new HBM capacity of the two Korean giants will instantly be oversupplied, product prices will collapse, and the huge initial investments will be wasted.
Next is the chain collapse script: huge corporate losses, export plunge, currency depreciation, nationwide asset price decline, perfectly replicating Japan's bubble burst process.
It seems Korea has gained short-term AI industry dividends, but in fact, it has completely handed over the dominance and future development path of the high-end chip industry.
A cooperation agreement that looks like a trillion-dollar order actually locks Korea's high-end industry ceiling, firmly handing the country's economic lifeline into American capital's hands, equivalent to a sellout contract!
Back to the market, do you feel a familiar vibe these days?
First extreme pressure, the US bombed Iran for 13 days straight, then US-Iran suddenly ceasefire
5+2, bombing Monday to Friday, on Sunday with geopolitical risk easing, US crude and Brent crude responded by falling, $BTC, $ETH and other risk assets rose accordingly, that's the logic.
Meme coins $SHIB, $DOGE did not follow the script; isn't the meme coin party usually the bull tail? Not sure what triggered yesterday 🤔?
#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ Is the crypto sector's rise against the trend—event-driven, or is it pulling up the market?
Bitcoin ($BTC) is currently trading at $65,370, with a 24-hour increase of about 1%. On the daily chart, it has fluctuated and climbed from the low of 63,854
Ethereum ($ETH) is currently trading at $1,953, up about 2.05%. On the daily chart, it has fluctuated upward from the low of 1850
Drivers of the upward trend
1. Marginal easing of the Middle East geopolitical situation
On July 26, Iran announced that the U.S. had ceased its strikes over the past two nights, and Iran's retaliatory strikes were also suspended. Meanwhile, Iran and Oman have made progress in consultations on shipping management in the Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world's most important oil shipping lanes, and the easing of the situation has directly boosted market risk appetite.
2. Ethereum ETF funds continue to flow in
As of the week ending July 26, Ethereum ETFs attracted about $103.9 million in inflows, three times the net asset size of Bitcoin ETFs (which only $33.8 million), even though Ethereum ETFs have only one-eighth the net asset size of Bitcoin ETFs. This structural capital inflow provides additional support for Ethereum.
3. Short liquidations boost the rebound
In the past 24 hours, the market saw approximately $54.71 million of leveraged positions forced liquidations, of which 88.71% (about $48.48 million) were short positions. Bears were forced to close their positions and buy, creating a driving effect. Among them, Ethereum-related liquidations reached $34.17 million, far exceeding Bitcoin's $9.08 million, which explains why Ethereum's gains have been significantly stronger than Bitcoin's.
Is this a rally?
From the data, the rebound is closer to a "short covering + event-driven" rebound, rather than deliberately driven by the main players:
Indicator Conclusion
Gains Scale: BTC less than 1.1%, ETH about 2.1%, moderate trading volume. Market trading volume shrinks, liquidity is weak. Ethereum ETFs continue to flow in, but overall there is no large-scale influx of new funds into the market. The market is on the 'stormy night' before the FOMC decision, with strong cautious sentiment
Currently, the market is in an extremely volume-shrinking sideways consolidation state, with both bulls and bears waiting for this week's interest rate decision to signal a key breakthrough. In a liquidity weak environment, even marginal positive news can trigger a certain rebound, but this is more a game of existing funds rather than a trend driven by incremental funds.
Summary: The rise in Bitcoin and Ethereum on July 27 was mainly driven by three factors: easing tensions in the Middle East, continued Ethereum ETF inflows, and short liquidations. It was a mild event-driven rebound rather than a typical "pull-up" behavior. The real direction may only become clear after this week's FOMC meeting is finalized.
Currently, multiple events are driving the crypto market, and this time there may truly be a different surprise—seize the opportunity and reap the future.
$DOGE
#多数党领袖称CLARITY休会前难通过
#美军暂停对伊空袭, negotiations on the opening of the strait made progress
#韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单 ETH rebounded to around $1966, mainly due to a sudden cooling in the Middle East and a recovery in risk appetite. Combined with ETH's own on-chain structural advantage 🎯, the direct catalyst: a "quasi-ceasefire" signal in the Middle East • An Iranian army spokesperson confirmed that the US military stopped strikes against Iran over the past two nights, and Iran's "reciprocal strikes" were also suspended • An Iranian armed forces spokesperson said the US "does not rule out the possibility of withdrawing from the war," but it depends on whether Israel agrees • Iran and Oman held multiple rounds of deputy foreign minister-level consultations in Tehran on shipping management of the Strait of Hormuz; both sides said talks were "productive and made some progress" • International oil prices plunged in response, WTI crude plunged 5% intraday, Brent fell below $🔗 94, structural positive for ETH itself • Staking exit queue reduced to zero: zero ETH waiting to exit while over 2.5 million ETH queued to enter, expected to wait about 44 days • Staking rate hits record high: nearly 41 million ETH staked across the entire network, Accounts for 33.6% of circulating supply. • The annualized yield on staking dropped from 3.05% to 2.62%, but investors are still increasing their holdings—indicating strong confidence in long-term holding, structurally compressing circulating selling pressure 💡. Simply put: more and more people are willing to lock their positions, and there are fewer ETH available for sale in the market. This is the reason ⚠️ for ETH's rebound itself. But the factors restraining it cannot be ignored: The rebound is not without risks; several unresolved risk points are: 1. Federal Reserve July 28-29 Interest Rate Meeting: Market Expectations for Rate Hikes2021 是币圈现货最鼎盛时期，未来也不会再出现（这种 defi 大爆发遇到流动性大泛滥的概率是百年难遇的），这个时期之后现货市场一直在萎缩的，一方面是整个市场萎缩、另一方面是 defi 无需许可上币对非头部 cex 的降维打击（山寨币的上币费和手续费全没了）、还有再后来的 etf 对主流币交易量的抢夺（这个主要影响头部大所），整体现货市场的手续费是 100%养不起一个交易所的，如果在 2021 年之后没有把永续合约这个现金流业务做起来的基本上就注定被淘汰的，早死与晚死的区别、有序体面的关闭还是跑路的区别。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ $BTC 长期持有者目前掌控着大部分供应，持仓比例正处在历史最高水平。这群人不太可能因为纳斯达克「可能」再跌10%就匆忙抛售手中的筹码。🧠
纳斯达克从高点已经回调了约10%。除非你坚定认为美股即将进入宏观级别的熊市——那属于另一个值得深聊的话题——否则，再往下走个5%-10%，对于真正的长期资金来说，影响真的不算大。⚠️
过去一年，比特币一直在走自己的独立节奏。在较长的时间框架下，BTC与纳斯达克甚至呈现负相关性。📉 历史数据也证明，BTC往往领先于纳指见底。因此，单凭纳指再跌10%这个理由，我认为并不足以构成BTC跌出新低的有力逻辑。💎
市场情绪可以短期波动，但链上结构与宏观节奏的背离，才是更值得关注的信号。Anti-monomab eventually fell flat, and all coins have been rising in the past two days. Here are the reasons
🕊️ As the US-Iran conflict cools, market risk appetite surges: US President Trump has paused military strikes against Iran, and Iran has stated that as long as the US stops its attacks, Iran will also cease its military actions. The roughly two-week-long direct US-Iran conflict has been put on pause, the market's tense geopolitical nerves have eased, and funds have once again flowed into risk assets.
· 📉 Oil prices plunge, inflation concerns ease: As the situation eases, international oil prices plunged sharply, with US crude plunging more than 5%. The drop in oil prices has directly eased market concerns about worsening inflation, creating a favorable environment for risk assets, including cryptocurrencies.
· 🏛️ Macroeconomic factors act as a "boost": The market generally expects the Federal Reserve (FOMC) meeting this week to keep rates unchanged, with a 78% probability of a rate cut in September. In addition, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen five consecutive days of inflows, totaling $727 million, with continued institutional capital inflows providing strong support for the market.
· 📈 Concentrated short positions are being closed out, boosting the rally: During the rally, large-scale leveraged short positions in Ethereum and other assets have been liquidated, further amplifying short-term gains.$CORE Six core reasons for the continuous new lows in coin prices
1. Inherent Defects in Token Economics: Continuous Massive Selling Pressure
Total supply is 2.1 billion, with over 700 million tokens controlled by the project side (15% team + 9.5% treasury + 10% reserves), which is the core cause of the long-term decline:
1. Team shares unlock linearly every 36 months: Tens of millions of zero-cost tokens are released monthly, with concentrated release in the middle of the second half of 2026, continuously flowing into the secondary market;
2. All 199.5 million treasury tokens were fully pledged for cash: The official government pledged treasury tokens to lend stablecoins, and the tokens were eventually sold off in batches, with no destruction process;
3. Reserve fund with 210 million unrestricted locked positions: When the market recovers, sales will be increased, and any rebound will serve as a distribution window for project teams;
4. Staking mechanism only locks retail investors' chips: B14G and node staking lock the circulating tokens held by retail investors, leaving only project teams selling on the market, causing permanent supply-demand imbalance; Daily CORE rewards are distributed daily for staking, which continues to inflate and further dilute the unit price.
2. Quantitative programmatic market control, proactively locking in all upside potential
The order book has consistently maintained standardized sell orders (as shown in the screenshot, with 5,449 consecutive fixed sell orders), which is direct evidence of artificially suppressing the market:
1. Fixed scripts for layered sell-offs: linked to fake accounts to issue unified sell orders. When the market meme rebounds across the board, quantitative sell orders will not be canceled, deliberately producing independent bearish declines;
2. Fake trading volume versus pushback volume: Most trading volume is created by one hand and the other hand creating a false sense of activity, with no genuine active buying. Volume expansion without growth and shrinking volume hitting new lows have become the norm;
3. Rebound equals selling mechanism: Once a small amount of bottom-fishing funds pushes prices up, quantitative trading immediately increases selling to prevent a trendy rally, causing a pulse market to quickly pull back within 1-2 days.
3. Ecological narrative is completely hollowed out, with all plans continuously delayed and generating no revenue
All BTCFi and SatPay value flywheels are just PR talk, lacking real cash flow to support token demand:
1. SatPay Bitcoin Bank extended by six months: Originally scheduled for commercial launch in the first half of 2026, currently only available for reservations, with no merchant offline transactions and no large-scale payment transactions, promised transaction fees and repurchase with no large purchase orders on the chain;
2. Bitcoin Power Grid is just an internal packaging concept: it is not a third-party giant's partnership, but rather an integration of its own product lines. Every time the decline worsens, it releases a lock-in announcement for stability and lockdown;
3. Diverting funds from BTCFi competitors: Pure Bitcoin L2s like Stacks and Babylon are competing for institutional funds; CORE has no exclusive technical barriers, TVL and staked BTC scale are inflated by invertation, and institutional funds collectively avoid risks;
4. B14G staking is only used to unlock tokens: The advertised staking volume is a new high, essentially guiding retail investors to buy and lock positions, facilitating project releases without creating rigid token demand.
4. Market consensus has completely collapsed, and incremental funds have become completely disconnected
1. The market is full of deeply trapped positions: the coin price plunged 99.6% from the high of $6.90, and positions near the current price of 0.018 generally lost 90%-99%, with no extra funds to add to bottom-fish;
2. Off-exchange funds form a consensus to avoid mines: After the spread of solid evidence of community quantitative manipulation, unlocking cash-out, and ecosystem defaults, speculative and short-term funds actively avoided them, and during this round of meme rebound, funds did not flow into CORE at all;
3. Collective Voice-Buying Silence: With no new investors to lure in, paid commenters' budgets shrink, no longer promoting all-in heavy positions, losing new buyers to join.
5. Centralized governance: project teams have no intention of token custody; the core goal is to ship goods
1. The DAO is nominally decentralized, but major chip allocation and market-making strategies are unilaterally controlled by the team, with no voice in the community;
2. The official buyback plan is full empty promises: no public ecosystem revenue flow, no ongoing large-scale buyback orders on-chain, no bottom-tier buyouts;
3. A mild decline is the optimal selling model: aggressive sell-off can lead to a low-volume crash, making it impossible to sell chips at all; Steady and layered sell-offs, using retail investors to bottom-fish and pledge and lock up massive zero-cost chips to slowly digest and extend the distribution cycle.
6. Continued negative macro and track conditions
1. BTCFi Sector Heat Fades: Market focus shifts to meme speculation, institutional funds withdraw from Bitcoin staking track;
2. Even if the Fed cuts rates, it's hard to reverse: loose liquidity only brings a brief pulse rebound, and project teams use liquidity peaks to concentrate selling, with positive news materialized and a second dip;
3. Tightening crypto regulation: Tightening inspections of market manipulation and token unlocking and cash-out have tightened, so project teams dare not invest funds to boost the market, maintaining a low-price warm water distribution model to avoid regulatory risks.
⚠️ Risk warning: Virtual currency trading speculation is considered illegal financial activity in China. The content only objectively analyzes the market and token economic logic, and does not constitute any investment or trading advice🔥 64,000 welded shut! BTC played the "heartbeat game" last night, with both bulls and bears waiting for the gunshot!
Friends, last night (July 26) the BTC trend can be summed up in one phrase — "playing dead style consolidation"!
During the day, it dipped to 63,666 USD, then ground back up to the 64,400-64,858 USD range at night, ending the day up just 0.8%. This isn’t a market move, it’s the "quiet period before the Fed rate decision" — everyone is holding their breath waiting for the fate-deciding meeting on July 28-29.
🎭 What exactly happened last night? Three forces arm wrestling
First force: Middle East cooling off, risk appetite warming up
On the 26th, the Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson personally admitted: talks with Oman about navigation through the Strait of Hormuz were "productive and made progress," and the US stopped strikes the past two nights. Once the news broke, the crypto market rallied across the board — DOGE surged 6%, ETH rose 2%, BTC nearly 1% approaching 64,500.
Second force: Oil price surge, shadow of rate hikes looming
But don’t celebrate too soon! The oil price jump reignited inflation worries, with the market betting the Fed might "keep rates high for longer." The Fear & Greed Index stayed at 26-27 (fear zone), BlackRock IBIT saw $212 million redeemed in one day, and institutions voting with their feet looked even worse than retail.
Third force: Leveraged longs getting bloodied
The 7-hour $2,000 flash crash on the 25th caused $323 million liquidations across the network, 84% of which were longs. Last night’s rebound? Volume shrank, it was a "technical repair after leveraged liquidation," not active buying.
⚠️ In plain terms: BTC wasn’t rising last night, it was "being propped up to not fall." Bulls got wiped out, bears didn’t dare to push further, both sides are waiting for the Fed to make a move.
📊 Key technical levels (watch these tonight)
Upper resistance: 64,500 USD is the intraday small-scale consolidation upper boundary, slight spikes likely to face pressure and pull back
First support: 63,700-64,000 USD, 4-hour MA50 moving average, lower boundary of this consolidation box
Mid-level support: 62,900-63,100 USD, daily MA30/MA50 confluence support, breaking this triggers a new round of correction
Psychological level: 60,000-60,200 USD, mid-term bull defense baseline
Ultimate bottom line: 58,000 USD, late June correction low, losing this means full bearish turn
Bollinger Bands three lines converging, a classic pre-breakout sign. Meaning — from tonight to tomorrow night, a direction must emerge!
🎯 My judgment (no calls, just logic)
Before the Fed meeting, BTC will likely continue to range between 63,000-64,500 USD. Three possible scenarios:
Scenario A (dovish surprise): Fed hints at rate cut window opening → BTC breaks above 64,500, target 65,600-67,200
Scenario B (neutral hold): Rates unchanged but ambiguous wording → continue "playing dead" near 64,000, waiting for CLARITY Act legislative window
Scenario C (hawkish strike): Due to oil prices and inflation, Fed reiterates "higher for longer" → 63,000 breaks, testing 60,000 psychological level downward
I personally lean between scenarios A and B — simple reason: options traders bought about $2.5 billion nominal BTC call spreads before July 31 expiry, betting BTC will climb to 72,000 USD. Smart money is telling you with real cash: they’re betting on a dovish Fed.
But! Oil price is a sword hanging overhead. Although the Strait of Hormuz navigation talks made progress, if they falter again, inflation expectations will reignite and the Fed will flip immediately.
🔍 Search keywords (for those wanting to understand this market move):
BTC July 26 night 64,400 consolidation | Fed July 28-29 rate meeting crypto market | BTC $2.5 billion call options 72,000 | Fear & Greed Index 27 BTC | Strait of Hormuz navigation talks Bitcoin | BlackRock IBIT redemption $212 million
⚠️ Risk warning:
This article is only market commentary and information compilation, not investment advice. BTC is highly volatile, extreme moves may occur around the Fed meeting, please strictly control position size, use stop losses, losses are your own responsibility! A new week has begun, and it's going to be lively!
The US and Iran have mutually restrained and paused hostilities, reigniting hopes for negotiations. Brent crude oil has consequently fallen below 90, allowing risk markets to catch a breather at least for this week.
Today, Hefei Changxin Technology was listed on the A-share market. Changxin Technology is a leading domestic DRAM manufacturer and one of the largest IPOs in the history of the STAR Market, with an issue price of 8.66 yuan, corresponding to a listing valuation of about 580 billion yuan.
On Wednesday, SK Hynix will release its Q2 earnings report. I believe the importance of this report is even comparable to Nvidia's; it is one of the most important indicators for this round of AI market trends.
On Thursday, the US PCE data will be released. If the core PCE monthly rate exceeds expectations, the market may further bet on high interest rates lasting longer, causing US Treasury yields and the dollar to strengthen, while tech stocks, BTC, and gold may come under pressure. If the core PCE monthly rate is below expectations, the market will reprice improved liquidity, which is positive for AI tech stocks and crypto assets.
The PCE data tells the market how inflation is doing, while the Federal Reserve's FOMC interest rate decision announced the same day tells you what the Fed plans to do.
Meta, Microsoft, Qualcomm, and ARM will all release their Q2 2026 earnings reports after the US market closes on July 29. Together with SK Hynix, they will jointly determine the direction of global AI tech stocks and risk assets for the next quarter.
After this week, more data will forecast the likely trends of risk markets in Q3 and Q4. AI is the future, not a bubble—at least, no bubble has formed yet!18年的时候，国内起码有上百家交易所，
收上币费的、自己发资产的、吃客损的，各式各样。
现在26年迎来了倒闭潮，除了单纯跑路的，
主要还是因为撮合交易已经不赚钱了，韭菜也完成了进化。
监管也更严了，大所之间都竞争激烈，开始卷服务，
小所就更完蛋了。
币圈要想重新好起来，就得丢掉以前的玩法，专心把真正有价值的东西，比如美股、债券做成能在链上低成本高效率的Web3资产，这不是野鸡所能玩得转的。
活下来的交易所，不能只是个赌场，也不是看谁能制造更多投机的机会，主要是看谁能把TradFi这块玩明白，能在这上面雕出花来，让华尔街那帮对Web3再次垂青侧目，才是本事。#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？ $BTC #财报观察员：Who can understand the real report card of Google and Tesla this time?
Google and Tesla almost simultaneously released their Q2 2026 earnings reports. The revenue figures look quite impressive, but after-hours, one dropped nearly 5%, the other over 4%. If you only see revenue growth, it means you haven't understood the true subtext of these financial reports. Essentially, these two report cards are asking the market for a huge vote of confidence.
Top performers on the surface, bleeding underneath
On the surface, both are the strongest ever.
Google's parent company Alphabet reported Q2 revenue of $119.8 billion, up 24% year-over-year, with cloud business soaring 82% to $24.8 billion. Tesla's Q2 revenue was $28.2 billion, up 26% year-over-year, with delivery volume hitting a record high.
But the capital market's reaction says it all. Beneath the shiny revenue lies a common point that made all investors gasp: free cash flow turned negative for both.
Google's free cash flow turned negative for the first time since going public, reaching -$5.9 billion. Tesla also turned negative for the first time in two years, recording -$1.09 billion.
Where did the money go? The bottomless pit of AI
This is the real answer in the financial reports. Both companies chose to throw huge profits and cash flow directly into the AI furnace.
Google's Q2 capital expenditure was $44.9 billion, nearly doubling year-over-year. The full-year capital expenditure guidance was raised to $195 billion–$205 billion, with a significant increase expected in 2027. Sixty percent of this money is invested in servers, 40% in data centers. To fill the gap, Google even issued $20.3 billion in bonds and raised $49.6 billion through stock issuance.
Tesla is even more extreme, with capital expenditure of $5.789 billion, soaring 142% year-over-year. Elon Musk put it bluntly: for the Optimus robot, everything has to be built from scratch. Full-year capital expenditure is expected to exceed $25 billion, and the company is even seeking to establish a $30 billion debt financing facility.
The temperature difference between Google and Tesla: one is selling shovels, the other betting their life
Both are bleeding heavily, but the fundamental logic of these two companies is different.
Google is an infrastructure fanatic; the investment is to consolidate the moat of cloud and search. Although free cash flow looks bad, Google Cloud's backlog of orders has exceeded $514 billion. CEO Pichai admits returns are still in the early stages, but the cloud business's 35.6% operating margin proves AI computing power is becoming infrastructure like water and electricity.
Tesla is making a big gamble. The traditional auto business's gross margin is under pressure, with operating margin falling from 4.1% to 1.4%. Now the company is putting all its focus on Robotaxi and Optimus. Although FSD subscription users have reached 1.48 million, this revenue is a drop in the bucket compared to capital expenditure. Trump's move is textbook-level market control: if he wants to buy the dip, he throws an Iranian bomb; if he wants to push the market, he calls for a ceasefire and peace talks. He has been playing the US stock and oil prices in circles, and every time news comes out, he can precisely capture sentiment. Stocks and oil traders have made a fortune these past few months, while only us crypto traders are just sitting there watching the show, or even getting beaten. Recently, $BTC has been fluctuating around 65,000, $ETH barely returning to 1,950, with gains of just over 1% and 4%. But compared to the ongoing highs of the Dow Jones and S&P, this rebound is nowhere near enough. The market has clearly become numb; the same script keeps repeating, fighting Jiubihe, Jiubi fighting, everyone guesses the follow-up strategy. But the real pain is that liquidity in the crypto world is being drained, and all the funds are chasing assets with stronger certainty. Trump is now controlling not only the G-spot in U.S. stocks but also the overall risk appetite indicator. As soon as the news stimulates the market, commodities fly ahead and funds flow out of the crypto market. Yesterday, $BTC briefly surged to 66,000, then pulled back today, indicating heavy selling pressure above. I suspect the market will need to bottom out next, unless there are unexpected rate cut signals or regulatory benefits, otherwise it's hard for the price to rise independently. In this cycle, some missed out, some were trapped, and the floating losses in cryptocurrency trading were heartbreaking. Rather than fantasizing about Trump issuing coins to rescue the market, it's better to face reality: his strategic focus has never been on crypto. The short-term strategy is to wait and see, waiting for clearer bottom signals. Bitcoin #以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零 #财报观察员: Who can understand Google?#财报观察员：谁能看懂谷歌和特斯拉这次的真实答卷？
谷歌、特斯拉Q2财报落地，营收双双超出预期，盘后却同步走弱。很多人只盯着涨跌结果，却看不懂两份财报内核天差地别，聊聊我的独立解读。
核心数据简要梳理：
谷歌：搜索广告基本盘稳固，谷歌云同比大涨82%，AI商业化持续兑现。隐患在于大幅加码算力投入，上市以来首次季度自由现金流转负，持续重金布局数据中心。盘后下跌属于利好落地后的良性调整。
特斯拉：整车交付创新高，营收稳步增长，但陷入增收不增利困境。整车毛利率持续下滑，资本开支同比暴涨142%，两年多自由现金流转负。市场担忧持续烧钱布局自动驾驶、人形机器人，短期难以产生现金流回报。
两者同样砸钱布局AI，含金量完全不同
1、谷歌属于良性投入
谷歌云已经拥有稳定企业订单与持续营收，加大算力投入，是承接已经落地的市场需求，长期投入具备变现渠道。短期现金流承压，不改长期成长底层逻辑。
2、特斯拉属于消耗式扩张
汽车主业利润持续被价格战挤压，Robotaxi、Optimus机器人还处在纯投入阶段，暂时没有商业化收入。依靠消耗短期利润押注远期赛道，资金信心持续松动。
延伸到加密市场的关键信号：
1、市场风格彻底切换，告别无脑抱团科技股。资金不再单纯为远期故事买单，开始严格区分“能够变现的AI”和纯概念炒作。
2、特斯拉持有大额BTC持仓是隐藏变量。持续现金流紧张，市场会持续担忧后续减持回笼资金，属于盘面潜在隐性利空。
3、宏观大环境定下基调：未来很难出现全面普涨大行情，只有结构性机会。没有真实业绩支撑的资产，估值会持续承压。
个人总结：
谷歌答卷：短期承压，长期价值稳固；
特斯拉答卷：数据亮眼，盈利隐患突出。
看懂这次分化，就能理解近期主流币震荡格局。资金变得更加谨慎，单纯情绪驱动的反弹很难持续。
大家觉得，科技巨头持续高额资本开支，会不会持续压制下半年风险资产反弹高度？📌 Why this earnings report exploded? As the first player to appear in the U.S. stock giants' earnings season, Google's parent company Alphabet delivered a controversial report card: AI investments are turning into real money at a pace far beyond expectations—Google Cloud grew by 82%, with over $500 billion in backlogged orders; But the cost is equally staggering: for the first time in decades since the company's listing, free cash flow turned negative, with a negative $5.9 billion in the second quarter, and full-year capital expenditures raised to $195–$205 billion. In short: AI is indeed monetizing, but burning cash even faster—so fast that even Google's own operating cash flow can't keep up. 💡 What does it mean for free cash flow to become negative? Free cash flow (operating cash flow minus capital expenditure) is a thermometer of a company's own self-sustaining capacity. Its turning negative means that the money Google earns is no longer enough to cover the data center, GPU, and energy expenses it invested in the AI arms race—the gap can only be made up by borrowing money or leasing off-balance-sheet. This picks up from the previous article: The five tech giants have $1.65 trillion in off-balance-sheet implicit debt, an eightfold increase in four years. Turning cash flow negative is an "open account," while implicit debt is a "hidden account." Together, these two ledgers represent the real cost of AI gambling—giants are using future debt to buy current computing power. 🔗 Returning to the crypto market: Ironclad evidence of AI narrative cash flow First, valuation anchors continue to loosen. Google is the anchor of the US stock market; if its cash flow turns negative, the market interprets it as "AI monetization can't keep up with investment." Once tech stocks are revalued, the Nasdaq will come under pressure → BTCOn the chessboard, K-lines are the afterimages of each move. Tesla, this black knight, dropped 20% in a week, from $391 to $313, equivalent to losing two horses and an elephant in a row, with the king's wing defense completely torn apart. Musk's wealth has shrunk from trillions to ninety billion, yet he can still joke about being a "former trillionaire"—this is like forcing a smile after losing the queen in the middle game, hoping to turn the endgame around with pawn promotion.
That old fox Burry added three lines to his game record: short positions on Nvidia, Micron, and semiconductor ETFs. He is waiting for the tech earnings season battle—Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon will make their moves next week. Nvidia's current forward P/E is 17x, with a five-year average of 36x. Is this a pawn deliberately sacrificed by the opponent? No, the position has already been lost, and the valuation center is moving downward. If QE is the baseline of the chessboard, then the Fed's chessboard is now drawn with dashed lines.
OKX has pushed tokenized U.S. stocks onto a 24-hour liquid chessboard, equivalent to replacing the traditional chess clock with an electronic timer—one move can be made three times, but the rules for determining victory remain unchanged. Tesla's nearly 20% weekly drop is not a single mistake but a chain reaction of five consecutive moves: SpaceX breaking below IPO price, Musk distracted by the X platform and DOGE, electric vehicle demand constrained by tariffs and oil prices (oil dropped from 141 to 91, this positional swap disrupted all energy hedging strategies). Musk's wealth shrank by 130 billion, analogous to sacrificing a rook on the chessboard's queen's wing—seemingly losing a piece but actually luring the opponent deep into a trap. But the premise is that the opponent will fall for it, and Wall Street now has Carlson-level computing power, so they won't fall for the elephant trap.
In Nvidia's ten-year chart, every major correction is preceded by a "false breakout" tactical combination. This year-to-date increase is only 10%, 15 pawn moves away from the historical high. Burry has placed all his heavy pieces on the dark squares of semiconductors, waiting for forced exchanges after the middle game. The earnings reports of Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon are the key moves in the next three rounds—if they also leak like Tesla, the entire tech sector will enter an endgame of king's wing stalemate.
True chess players never look at single-step gains or losses, only whether the position still holds hidden attacking lines. Tesla's $313 is not the bottom line; it is the last strong square before the elephant's eye is blocked. #EarningsRealityCheck 我是不是又错过了？现在上车$BTC还来得及吗？别慌，这波不是你的错，是整个市场被吓傻了。今天凌晨的消息，美军空袭伊朗核设施。没错，中东火药桶又被点着了。全球资本瞬间切换避险模式，股市、加密货币集体跳水。大盘一天跌了1%，总市值缩水到2.14万亿。看着不多，但这是恐慌盘，是真金白银在往外逃。$BTC跌得还算克制，$ETH和其他山寨就惨了，血流成河。先别慌。地缘冲突砸出来的坑，历史上看往往是黄金坑。2020年伊朗炸美军基地，$BTC当天跌7%，三天后创新高。2022年俄乌开打，也是先崩后拉，两个月翻倍。但这次有个区别——现在是2026年的震荡市。不是单边牛市，多头没那么强。所以修复可能会慢一些，别指望明天就V回来。我觉得今天这波恐慌还没释放完。美军会不会扩大打击？伊朗会不会报复？这些不确定性能让市场抖好几天。想抄底的，等第二根阴线出来再考虑。已经持仓的，别在这个时候割肉，太冤了。$BTC破位了吗？还没有，关键支撑还在。3.1万那个位置如果守不住，那就真要小心了。守住的话，这波就是洗盘。我个人倾向于能守住，但仓位重的确实难受。避险情绪来得快去得也快。中东那地方每次都是雷声大雨点小。等硝烟散一承重墙的裂缝已经肉眼可见，而这栋号称“合规摩天楼”的CLARITY Act还没打完地基就收到了结构审查黄牌。蓝图上的荷载分布清晰地标明了每道伦理承重墙的位置，但现在民主党与消费者群体拿着放大镜敲开了墙体表面，发现了一处致命设计缺陷——DOJ作为唯一的结构支撑点，单点失效概率简直是个笑话。更麻烦的是，关于间接持仓的那些模糊地带，就像图纸上被标注为“后期处理”的悬挑梁，谁也不知道它什么时候会带着整层楼塌下来。
特朗普那笔约14亿美元的加密货币收益，根本就是原地违规加盖的一层空中花园，无梁无柱，全靠政治风向悬挂。现在这股风转向了，August休会期前想拿到开工许可证？ Senate多数党领袖Thune自己都说，台风窗口已经关闭。预测市场给出的三分之一的通过概率，相当于施工方报出的三分之一进度——可实际上现场只有临时板房和一台闲置的塔吊。
再来看$XMSTR的动态——它就是这栋法案大楼旁边正在搭建的钢结构骨架，地基打得深，但周围全是未完成的混凝土浇筑。市场联动就像两台塔吊的摇摆频率，一个不稳，另一个也跟着震颤。如果你把CLARITY看作整个加密区域的总规划许可证，那么$XMSTR的每一次价格位移都像是在调整临时支撑柱的垫板——它不是主体承重，但缺了它，隔壁的悬挑楼板就要开始下挠。
白皮书再漂亮也只是效果图，真正的金融建筑从来靠的是桩基深度和现浇楼板的密实度。而眼前的现实是：那块标着“2029年1月20日自动失效”的条款，就像图纸上的过期保质期标记——不修，就在角落里慢慢腐蚀整栋楼的寿命。
这栋楼的结构计算书里，安全系数已经被划掉了。#CLARITYActStalled The biggest positive news this weekend: TACO is back, and storage has also received a "stop the decline" card. To start with the conclusion: the overall news this weekend is mostly positive, and the storage sector has conditions for a rebound on Monday, but it cannot yet be defined as a reversal. Macroeconomically, Trump is once again playing TACO; industrially, SK Hynix and Samsung have secured long-term cooperation strong enough to refute the idea that "AI capital expenditure has peaked"; however, oil prices remain above $100, and deleveraging in the South Korean market is not over, so short-term volatility will not be small. The most important change this weekend is that Trump suddenly paused airstrikes on Iran. After 13 consecutive nights of bombing Iran, the Pentagon suddenly halted operations on Friday, and Iran subsequently stated that as long as the US does not resume attacks, Iran will continue the ceasefire. The US Ambassador to the UN said that Trump is "leaving some room for negotiations." The market is already familiar with this script: push the conflict to the limit, wait for oil prices, inflation, and the stock market to start feeling pressure, then proactively step back halfway to gain negotiation leverage—a standard TACO trade. But this time, we cannot just look at the two words "ceasefire." The Houthi forces attacked oil facilities in Jizan and Yanbu, Saudi Arabia, over the weekend, with Yanbu being an important route for Saudi Arabia to export crude oil to the Red Sea bypassing the Strait of Hormuz. In other words, although the US and Iran have temporarily stopped, the conflict is beginning to spread to the Red Sea and the Caspian Sea, and Brent crude remains above $100. (Reuters) Therefore, the ideal market scenario on Monday is: continued restraint between the US and Iran, a drop in crude oil, and a risk appetite recovery for tech stocks. Conversely, if attacks in the Red Sea escalate, oil prices surge again, and the benefits brought by TACO will soon be offset by inflation and US Treasury yields. On the storage front, the real hard positive news this weekend comes from South Korea. SK Group and a US tech company announced a long-term cooperation totaling $750 billion, including SK Hynix's cooperation with $NVDA as part of an AI plan exceeding $500 billion. Both parties will jointly develop the next generation of HBM and supply HBM4 long-term for the Vera Rubin platform. SK Telecom will also build a 2GW-level AI data center planned to go online in 2027. Meanwhile, Samsung signed a memorandum of understanding with $AVGO for cooperation up to $200 billion, covering HBM, AI accelerators, sub-2nm foundry, and advanced packaging. The combined cooperation amounts to $950 billion. (Reuters) This figure should not be simply understood as $950 billion in locked-in revenue. Samsung currently signed an MOU, and SK's $500 billion figure with Nvidia also includes data center and infrastructure construction. But the signal it sends is very clear: AI companies are now worried not about having too much storage, but about not getting enough HBM, advanced packaging, and data center capacity in the coming years. This echoes Google's increased CapEx. The market previously traded on the idea that "AI investment is about to peak," but the industry side now answers that Nvidia, Broadcom, OpenAI, and Anthropic are all locking in future supply in advance. There is also a tariff news this weekend that is easy to misread. The US set a comprehensive tariff of up to 12.5% on South Korean goods, which looks unfavorable to Samsung and SK Hynix at first glance. But the US Trade Representative's exemption list explicitly includes HTSUS 8542.32 "Electronic Integrated Circuits: Memory" in the exemption scope. Therefore, this round of new tariffs will not directly hit imported storage chips from the US; whether finished products like SSDs are affected depends on specific product codes. (USTR official document) However, positive news does not mean you can blindly chase on Monday. Last Friday, $MU fell about 7%, SK Hynix's US ADR dropped 8.8%, and the storage sector is still in a high-volatility deleveraging phase. South Korean regulators also moved up the 30 million KRW margin requirement for single-stock leveraged ETFs to July 31, so Samsung and SK Hynix may still face passive reduction pressure. (Reuters) So my judgment is: the weekend news is clearly better than market expectations at Friday's close. $Micron(MU)$, $SanDisk(SNDK)$, $Western Digital(WDC)$, and $Seagate Technology(STX)$ all have a basis for sentiment recovery, but this looks more like a "stop the decline catalyst" rather than a confirmed reversal. What will truly determine whether storage can enter a second wave of rally is Seagate's earnings report on Tuesday, followed by Microsoft's statement on AI capital expenditure on Wednesday and Amazon's on Thursday. In summary: TACO has bought the market some breathing room, the $950 billion cooperation reconfirms long-term demand, but for storage to truly reverse, oil prices need to cool down, South Korea's deleveraging must end, and Microsoft and Amazon must continue to pay for AI investment. Aave V4主网上线推动底层流动性结构重估。资金集中注入单一Hub并由不同Spoke共享底层流动性，大幅降低新市场冷启动成本与碎片化消耗。若Spoke端口借贷需求放量且资金效率保持提升，将推动 $AAVE 资金流出入盘面实现结构性修复。若后续观察到特定Spoke因清算规则问题触发Hub池资金提现潮，该流动性重估逻辑失效。
#交易之声：你的经验值得被听到 #韩国存储双雄获AI双巨头大单 #黄仁勋首推开源AI公开信，获行业集体背书565 billion USD. It's not that you're seeing things—it's Visa's just-adjusted June data—Base's monthly stablecoin movement far left the $ETH mainnet far behind. What does this mean? This means the underlying narrative of crypto payments is being completely rewritten. Ethereum was once the absolute king of DeFi, but in the payments sector, it was too slow, too expensive, and too formal. Base is so powerful not because of its advanced technology, but because it's cheap and fast, backed by Coinbase, the gateway that can bring both the elderly and elderly into Web3. Visa's data this time isn't meant to boost L2s—it's meant to prove them wrong. The payment layer isn't really about consensus algorithms; it's about who can make users spend $USDC without feeling anything. Ethereum mainnet is now like a custom suit for Paris Fashion Week—attractive, expensive, and upscale, but the market aunties don't need it. Base is that Uniqlo piece—don't laugh, it's worn worldwide. Some people are still wondering, "Isn't Base also part of the Ethereum ecosystem?" Saying things like this is like saying your money is in Yu'ebao and still counts in the banking system. Ecosystem ownership is nominal; capital flows are real. On-chain liquidity is being voted on with real money, and 565 billion has already been invested. $ETH can still fight? Yes, but the keys to the payment layer may no longer be in its hands. Base is seizing the demand for stablecoins this time, while Ethereum is still busy with technical upgrades. Steady progress is true, but the market waits for no one. I won't chase the highs, but I will keep an eye on the circulating supply of $USDC in the Base ecosystem. Pay for this, who🐋 鲸鱼观察：Ondo Finance $ONDO 代表了华尔街资本市场与公共 DeFi 基础设施之间的结构性桥梁。以下是对其产品架构、L1 基础设施、代币经济学以及系统性风险的机构研究分解。
组织设计：Ondo 通过双脑模型运作。公司 SPV 处理监管合规、托管关系以及链下资产发行，而独立 DAO 则管理链上开源软件，如 Flux Finance。
OUSG 机构收益：根据 SEC Rule 3c-7 为合格购买者（净值 500 万美元以上）构建。主要由 BlackRock 的 BUIDL 基金支持，实现 24/7 即时铸造/赎回，并通过硬编码智能合约白名单强制执行。
USDY（零售收益票据）：一种 Regulation S 代币化票据，由美国国债和银行存款担保，Ankura Trust 担任抵押代理。支付由底层利息资助，发行人捕获净息差。
USDY 与 rUSDY：USDY 通过价格升值累积收益。rUSDY 通过每日自动重基包装合约扩展代币余额，维持固定的 1.00 美元价格点。
Ondo Chain：专为机构清算和结算优化的专用 L1。采用 Tendermint PoS 共识机制，配备许可的金融机构验证者、RWA 抵押质押，以及以 USDY 原生支付的 gas 费用。
Flux Finance：Compound v2 的修改版，创建了一个链上国债回购市场。合格购买者发布许可的 OUSG 抵押品，以借入无许可稳定币 USDC，由公共 DeFi 用户提供。
$ONDO 代币经济学：固定供应 100 亿枚代币，分配为 52.1% 生态系统、33% 协议开发、12.9% 私募销售、2% 社区。$ONDO 授予对 Flux 和 Ondo Chain 的协议治理权，但不主张公司现金流。
风险矩阵：关键漏洞包括代币化票据的法律监管变动、多签升级密钥、美联储降息压缩国债收益率，以及跨链桥安全预算。
战略展望：Ondo 展示了机构 RWA 如何通过将合规门控资产与无许可借贷基础设施配对来扩展规模，为机构链上金融设定标准。You might not have noticed that Ethereum quietly changed a new underlying element in the Pectra upgrade in May 2025. It's not about how much gas fees have dropped, nor how much blob throughput has multiplied. It's the very concept of "accounts." Since Ethereum launched in 2015, everyone has gotten used to one setup: you have two types of accounts. One is the External Owned Account (EOA), which is the kind you use in MetaMask, controlled by private keys. The other is the contract account, which is code-controlled. EOA is simple and direct, but extremely fragile. If you lose your private key, you lose it; if you get hacked, it's gone. If you want to do batch operations, you have to sign every single transaction. Without gas fees, you can't move. EIP-7702 broke through this wall. What exactly did it do? Simply put: EIP-7702 allows your EOA to temporarily "borrow" the ability of smart contracts. You don't need to migrate to a brand-new smart wallet. You don't need to deploy new contracts. You only need to sign an authorization, and your regular wallet can do things that previously only smart accounts could do. Batch execution of trades—no need to approve first and then swap; sign in two steps, done in one operation. Gas payment on behalf — the project team can pay the gas fee for you, or you can pay gas with USDC. Spending limit—you can set a daily spending limit for your wallet. Recovery mechanism—losing private keys does not result in permanent asset loss. Sounds like a small UX improvement? No. This is about changing "who can use Ethereum."ETH really surged today, not just a small rebound.
Current price 1,952, up 4.20% in 24h. Over the weekend it hovered around 1,860-1,885, and in one day it jumped nearly 90 dollars, with the 24h high of 1,952.98 just made moments ago. This level is not reached casually—it's the upper boundary of the ascending channel since June 26, and also the level of 1,945 that ETH failed to break on July 22. Today is the third time hitting this resistance.
Why did ETH suddenly surge so strongly today? I found three reasons, the first being the most important:
First, ETH/BTC broke through an 11-month downtrend line. This is a signal that technical analysts have been waiting for. Analyst Ted Pillows said: "Ethereum could start outperforming Bitcoin heavily now"—ETH may start to significantly outperform BTC. From August 2025 until now, ETH/BTC has been in a descending channel, and today the upper boundary of this channel was broken. Technically, this is the first confirmation signal that ETH's mid-term weakness is over. Capital reacted immediately; today ETH rose 4.20%, BTC only 1.65%, and the exchange rate surged in one day.
Second, 1,950-1,960 is a concentrated short position zone, currently being crushed. CoinGlass data shows a large amount of short positions piled up in this area. ETH's current price of 1,952 has already entered this zone; if the daily candle closes above 1,953, it will trigger a chain liquidation, forcing shorts to cover and pushing the price up—this explains why today's volume reached 5.9 billion, significantly higher than usual.
Third, ETH ETFs continue to see net inflows. Recent trading days show a net inflow of 37.47 million, with BlackRock ETHA alone buying 52.7 million. Institutions have been accumulating at the 1,850-1,900 level, while retail investors remain fearful (index at 27), a typical bottom characteristic. Since Q3 began, ETH has risen 22.98%, far exceeding the historical quarterly average of 8.86%, making it the strongest Q3 since 2022.
Technical analysis (based on real-time price):
Current price 1,952, breaking through the 1,945-1,953 resistance band (failed on 7/22, today is the third attempt)
Upper resistance: 1,953 (breaking now) → 1,981 (100-day SMA) → 2,000 (psychological level) → 2,009 (MA100, resisted 4 times since mid-June)
Lower support: 1,927 (just broken, now support) → 1,900 → 1,850 (lower boundary of ascending channel, holding this keeps the channel valid) → 1,828 (20-day SMA)
1,950-1,960 is a short concentration zone; breaking it triggers chain liquidations
1,900-1,910 and 1,955-1,965 have large leveraged positions
My judgment: today's close is critical. If the daily candle closes above 1,953, the breakout is confirmed technically, next target is 1,981 (100-day SMA), then a tough fight at 2,000 and MA100 (2,009). This time is different from the previous four attempts to break MA100—ETH/BTC has already broken out, providing exchange rate support, so ETH is not fighting alone.
But risks are clear:
First, leverage is heavily stacked. Open interest increased by 600,000 ETH in 2 days, total open interest at 14.6 million ETH, a new high since June 7. Funding rates briefly turned negative on Thursday. At this leverage level, if the FOMC turns hawkish, chain liquidations could be more violent than the rise.
Second, chasing longs at 1,952 is very risky. From 1,908 to 1,952, a 44-dollar jump in one day without pullback, RSI on 4H is near overbought. Chasing at the moment of resistance breakout risks a fakeout and a retest of 1,927, which would trap you for a 25-dollar loss.
Third, FOMC is tomorrow. Once Powell speaks, all technical levels become meaningless. Hawkish → ETH, a highly elastic asset, will be hit first; a drop from 1,952 back to 1,850 is possible.
Trading strategy (based on my risk preference):
For longs at 1,850-1,870: best position. Move stop loss to 1,890 to let profits run. Hold if 1,953 holds, target 1,981 → 2,000. Cut half if breaks 1,927.
For longs near 1,890: hold if 1,953 holds, stop loss at 1,910. Close if breaks 1,927.
No position: do not chase at 1,952. Wait for either a pullback to 1,927-1,935 without breaking to try a light long (5% position), stop loss 1,910, target 1,981; or wait for daily confirmation of breakout above 1,953 and then a pullback without break to enter, stop loss 1,935.
Chasing above 2,000 is the dumbest move; MA100 at 2,009 will likely push price back. 2,000-2,009 is a zone to reduce positions.
Medium to long-term faith positions: staggered entries at 1,825-1,850, stop loss 1,780 (break of ascending channel lower boundary), target 2,060+ (channel upper boundary).
ETH/BTC exchange rate is a key signal today. If ETH continues to outperform BTC this week, altseason money is really starting to move. Today is day one, but this strength (+4.20% vs +1.65%) deserves attention. I used to say ETH is a "follower," but today I have to change that—ETH is trying to lead this rebound.
Final words: ETH is fighting the most important technical battle since June today. If the daily candle closes firmly above 1,953, next targets are 2,000 and MA100. But with FOMC tomorrow, chasing longs at 1,952 is betting on Powell being dovish. Don't heavy bet on direction the day before FOMC; this is a lesson I paid for with real money.
#美军暂停对伊空袭，海峡通航谈判获进展
$ETH DataHunter Macro Research Report · July 27, 2026
📋 Summary of this issue
With only two days left until the July 28-29 FOMC meeting, the market shows a rare high level of divergence in recent years regarding the Federal Reserve's policy direction. CME Fed Funds futures data indicate the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in July has surged from 13% a week ago to 38%; the interest rate swap market shows about a 30% chance of a hike and a 70% chance of no change. Such significant divergence so close to the meeting date is rare in recent years.
This article analyzes the core highlights and possible scenarios of this meeting from three dimensions: oil price shocks, Waller's style, and internal FOMC divisions.
🛢️ 1. Oil Prices: From 70 to 100, the direct trigger for rate hike expectations
The most direct driver of the sharp rise in rate hike expectations is the surge in oil prices.
On July 23, Brent crude oil closed above $100 per barrel for the first time since May, marking a 25% increase since the June Fed meeting. The oil price breaking the $100 mark directly triggered market concerns about inflation rising again. The head of interest rate strategy at Bank of America stated: "The July Fed meeting is definitely 'live.' Whether current monetary policy is restrictive is itself a big question. And oil prices are rising again now."
Because energy costs are highly correlated with inflation expectations, the rise in oil prices is fundamentally changing the market's judgment on the Fed's policy path. Previously, the market expected U.S. inflation to continue slowing, possibly prompting a policy shift, but the recent oil price surge has revived rate hike expectations. PGIM's chief U.S. economist described next week's meeting as "almost a 50-50 chance."
The direction of oil prices is the direction of rate expectations.
🔇 2. Waller's "New Rule": No guidance, the market guesses on its own
Another major source of market divergence is Fed Chair Waller's communication style, which is completely different from his predecessor.
Since taking office in May, Waller has clearly stated he will abolish the Fed's long-standing practice of providing the market with advance signals on the interest rate path, believing that forward guidance unnecessarily constrains policymakers when economic conditions change. Earlier this month, Waller testified to Congress expressing "zero tolerance" for persistent high inflation but gave almost no clues about the policy path.
Nomura Securities expects Waller will not provide substantive forward guidance at the post-FOMC press conference.
This means the most valuable information from this meeting will no longer be the rate decision itself, but the dissenting votes, statement wording, and Waller's tone. Bloomberg expects Waller to maintain a hawkish stance, emphasizing that inflation remains too high and leaving open the possibility of a September rate hike.
Bianco Research's president summarized: "No forward guidance means we will frequently see probability distributions of 20%, 30%, 40%. The market is transitioning to this new way of thinking."
⚖️ 3. Inside the FOMC: Hawks gathering, possible voting splits
Voices supporting rate hikes are accumulating.
Dallas Fed President Logan is currently the only FOMC voting member publicly calling for a rate hike. Cleveland Fed President Mester and Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari may also join the opposition. PGIM economists note: "Hawkish sentiment inside the Fed is reaching a critical mass."
At the June meeting, the Fed unanimously voted 12-0 to keep rates unchanged. If at the July meeting Logan and Mester formally vote against and call for a hike, it means the Fed's hawkish forces have escalated from "opposing continued hints of rate cuts" to "demanding an immediate rate hike."
There are also forces supporting a wait-and-see approach.
June nonfarm payrolls increased by only 57,000, significantly below the previous three-month average of 164,000; June CPI fell 0.4% month-over-month, signaling cooling inflation. Natixis expects the Fed to keep rates unchanged in July and maintain this stance throughout 2026. Morgan Stanley also believes recent data indicate the Fed will hold steady in July. Influential voices like New York Fed President Williams lean toward waiting until September to decide, allowing more time to observe inflation trends.
Two forces are forming a standoff within the FOMC.
🔮 4. Two scenario simulations
Scenario 1: Hold rates steady (probability about 60-65%)
The Fed keeps the federal funds rate at 3.50%-3.75%. However, the statement wording may be hawkish, emphasizing ongoing inflation risks and the need to monitor energy price shocks. Waller does not rule out a September rate hike at the press conference.
· Market impact: After short-term volatility, gradual stabilization. BTC is likely to fluctuate between 63,600-65,400; if the statement is dovish, a rebound to 66,000 is possible.
· Key points: Are there dissenting votes? How many? Does the wording mention "additional policy tightening"?
Scenario 2: Surprise 25 basis point hike (probability about 35-38%)
The Fed raises rates by 25 basis points at the July meeting.
· Market impact: Sharp short-term sell-off in risk assets. BTC may quickly fall below 63,000 and even test 61,000-62,000. U.S. Treasury yields continue rising, and the dollar index strengthens.
· Key points: How does Waller explain this decision? Is it "one-off" or "the start of a hiking cycle"?
📌 5. Implications for the crypto market
Currently, BTC is trading in an extremely low-volume sideways range between 64,000-64,600, with the market in the "calm before the storm" ahead of the FOMC decision.
Three key time points (Beijing time):
· July 30 (Thursday) 2:00 AM: FOMC rate decision announced
· July 30 (Thursday) 2:30 AM: Waller press conference
· July 30 (Thursday) 8:30 PM: U.S. Q2 GDP preliminary and June PCE data released simultaneously
For traders, the core uncertainty of this meeting lies in Waller's "no guidance" style combined with the oil price shock, making it impossible for the market to price in advance as before. CME futures trading volume is 50% higher than at last July's decision, directly reflecting this uncertainty.
Operationally: Be cautious and trade less before the direction is clear. If the meeting signals hawkishness (dissenting votes + hawkish wording), BTC may retest lows; if the statement is neutral or dovish, BTC may stabilize and rebound near 63,600. Waiting before the FOMC is part of the trade.
DataHunter | Understanding the market through data反弹≠反转，risk-on 这股气含着刀子。$ETH 飙 4%，$QQQ 却绿得扎眼，盘面在等——谁先露怯，谁就定今天的调。
看数字
$BTC 65,283 +1.45% $ETH 1,952 +4.14%
$QQQ -1.12% $SPY +0.10% $IBIT -0.82%
$DXY -0.15% $GLD +0.10%
聊形势。霍尔木兹和原油还在往通胀预期里塞变数，美债收益率和 Fed 紧缩的阴影继续压着估值，美元也不是背景板，汇率线随便拨一下就能把 $QQQ $SPY 的节奏打乱。今天这盘子，哪个开关被碰都不奇怪。
逐个拆。$ETH 弹性明显强过 $BTC，短期风险偏好翘头，但 $QQQ 沉沉往下走，钱在往防守里缩。$IBIT 弱于现货 $BTC，ETF 一软说明现货那股力量没那么硬；$DXY 微微松口气，风险资产才得喘，但一抽紧马上翻脸；$GLD 还在悄摸涨，避险资金根本没撤干净，别被表面热闹骗了。
等开盘，不要急着加仓。信号没给全，谁先露怯，谁就帮我们定方向。
#以太坊验证者退出队列已降至零一、早盘整体概览 截至北京时间7月27日07:00，周一早盘加密市场短线反弹拉升，比特币快速走高重新站上65000美元整数关口，以太坊同步跟涨。周末窄幅整理后，亚盘早盘买盘力量阶段性释放，市场情绪小幅修复；但本周美联储利率决议临近，整体交投仍偏谨慎，成交量未出现显著放大。山寨币随大盘普涨，前期回调的题材品种出现小幅反弹，市场整体赚钱效应较周末有所回升。 二、主流币种实时行情 1. 比特币（BTC） • 实时报价：65,333美元，24小时涨幅0.95% • 24小时运行区间：64,200美元 - 65,420美元 • 盘面解读：早盘快速拉升，一举收复65000美元关键关口，短线结束连续两日的弱势调整。短期上方压力位65,800美元（前高附近），下方核心支撑64,800美元；本次反弹属于技术性修复，决议前增量资金有限，暂不视为趋势反转。 • 核心驱动：美元指数亚盘小幅回落，叠加周末低位抄底资金集中入场，推动币价短线反弹；市场仍在等待周四美联储利率决议的最终指引。 2. 以太坊（ETH） • 实时报价：1,952美元，24小时涨幅1.62%，反弹力度强于比特币 • 24小时运行区间：1,9"DataHunter Macro Research Report" · July 27, 2026
📋 Summary of this issue
With only two days left until the July 28-29 FOMC meeting, the market shows a rare high level of divergence in recent years regarding the Federal Reserve's policy direction. CME Fed Funds futures data indicate the probability of a 25 basis point rate hike in July has surged from 13% a week ago to 38%; the interest rate swap market shows about a 30% chance of a hike and a 70% chance of no change. Such significant divergence so close to the meeting date is rare in recent years.
This article analyzes the core highlights and possible scenarios of this meeting from three dimensions: oil price shocks, Waller's style, and internal FOMC divisions.
🛢️ 1. Oil Prices: From 70 to 100, the direct trigger for rate hike expectations
The most direct driver of the sharp rise in rate hike expectations is the surge in oil prices.
On July 23, Brent crude oil closed above $100 per barrel for the first time since May, marking a 25% increase since the June Fed meeting. The oil price breaking the $100 mark directly triggered market concerns about inflation rising again. The head of interest rate strategy at Bank of America stated: "The July Fed meeting is definitely 'live.' Whether current monetary policy is restrictive is itself a big question. And oil prices are rising again now."
Because energy costs are highly correlated with inflation expectations, the rise in oil prices is fundamentally changing the market's judgment on the Fed's policy path. Previously, the market expected U.S. inflation to continue slowing, possibly prompting a policy shift, but the recent oil price surge has revived rate hike expectations. PGIM's chief U.S. economist described next week's meeting as "almost a 50-50 split."
The direction of oil prices is the direction of rate expectations.
🔇 2. Waller's "New Rule": No guidance, the market guesses on its own
Another major source of market divergence is Fed Chair Waller's communication style, which is completely different from his predecessor's.
Since taking office in May, Waller has clearly stated he will abolish the Fed's long-standing practice of providing the market with advance signals on the interest rate path, believing that forward guidance unnecessarily constrains policymakers when economic conditions change. Earlier this month, Waller testified to Congress expressing "zero tolerance" for persistent high inflation but gave almost no clues about the policy path.
Nomura Securities expects Waller will not provide substantive forward guidance at the post-FOMC press conference.
This means the most valuable information from this meeting will no longer be the rate decision itself but the dissenting votes, statement wording, and Waller's tone. Bloomberg expects Waller to maintain a hawkish stance, emphasizing that inflation remains too high and leaving open the possibility of a September rate hike.
Bianco Research's president summarized: "No forward guidance means we will frequently see probability distributions of 20%, 30%, 40%. The market is transitioning to this new way of thinking."
⚖️ 3. Inside the FOMC: Hawks gathering, possible voting splits
Voices supporting rate hikes are accumulating.
Dallas Fed President Logan is currently the only FOMC voting member publicly calling for a rate hike. Cleveland Fed President Mester and Minneapolis Fed President Kashkari may join the opposition. PGIM economists note: "Hawkish sentiment inside the Fed is reaching a critical mass."
At the June meeting, the Fed unanimously voted 12-0 to keep rates unchanged. If at the July meeting Logan and Mester formally vote against and call for a hike, it means the Fed's hawkish forces have escalated from "opposing continued hints of rate cuts" to "demanding an immediate rate hike."
There are also forces supporting a wait-and-see approach.
June nonfarm payrolls increased by only 57,000, significantly below the previous three months' average of 164,000; June CPI fell 0.4% month-over-month, signaling cooling inflation. Natixis expects the Fed to keep rates unchanged in July and maintain this stance throughout 2026. Morgan Stanley also believes recent data indicate the Fed will hold steady in July. Influential voices like New York Fed President Williams lean toward waiting until September to decide, allowing more time to observe inflation trends.
These two forces are forming a standoff within the FOMC.
🔮 4. Two scenario simulations
Scenario 1: Hold rates steady (probability about 60-65%)
The Fed will keep the federal funds rate at 3.50%-3.75%. However, the statement wording may lean hawkish, emphasizing ongoing inflation risks and the need to monitor energy price shocks. Waller will not rule out a September rate hike at the press conference.
· Market impact: After short-term volatility, gradual stabilization. BTC is likely to fluctuate between 63,600-65,400; if the statement is dovish, a rebound to 66,000 is possible.
· Key points: Are there dissenting votes? How many? Does the wording mention "additional policy tightening"?
Scenario 2: Surprise 25 basis point hike (probability about 35-38%)
The Fed raises rates by 25 basis points at the July meeting.
· Market impact: Sharp short-term sell-off in risk assets. BTC may quickly fall below 63,000 and even test 61,000-62,000. U.S. Treasury yields continue rising, and the dollar index strengthens.
· Key points: How does Waller explain this decision? Is it "one-off" or "the start of a hiking cycle"?
📌 5. Implications for the crypto market
Currently, BTC is trading in an extremely low-volume sideways range between 64,000-64,600, with the market in the "calm before the storm" ahead of the FOMC decision.
Three key time points (Beijing time):
· July 30 (Thursday) 2:00 AM: FOMC rate decision announced
· July 30 (Thursday) 2:30 AM: Waller press conference
· July 30 (Thursday) 8:30 PM: U.S. Q2 GDP preliminary and June PCE data released simultaneously
For traders, the core uncertainty of this meeting lies in Waller's "no guidance" style combined with the oil price shock, making it impossible for the market to price in advance as before. CME futures trading volume is 50% higher than at last July's decision, directly reflecting this uncertainty.
Operationally: Favor watching and limited action before direction is clear. If the meeting signals hawkishness (dissenting votes + hawkish wording), BTC may retest lows; if the statement is neutral or dovish, BTC may stabilize and rebound near 63,600. Waiting before the FOMC is part of trading.
DataHunter | Understanding the market through data